January 6th Insurrection / 3rd Anniversary 🥲

TRUMP IS A TRAITOR!!

1. Trump latest Iowa speech, his cases r corrupt, they move faster than anyone, republican judges go out of the way to be fair, the ones I appointed I fought for, hope they're fair. He's a worker that knows how to make money 💰 he's a clown and a traitor. Everyone should be arrested except him, he claims the current success is cause of him. He believes we're heading for depression if he's not elected.

2. Jack Smith response Brief to Trump's contempt filing: "recycled allegations of partisanship and prosecutorial misconduct remain baseless."

3. he has not explained how "the mere receipt" of documents that he doesn't have to reply to "possibly burdens him."

4. Smith's filing noted that three days before Chutkan entered her order pausing deadlines in the case

5. Trump's request that the Judge hold the government in contempt is an overreach: Joy Vance, former prosecutor states

6. Chutkan noted that while her deadlines are “held in abeyance,”

7. proceeding is a legal action, such as a trial, hearing, or application, that is part of the enforcement, adjudication, or administration of rights, remedies, laws, or regulations.

8. At issue is a Dec. 13 order from Chutkan issued after Trump appealed to a higher court an earlier ruling that rejected his claims that he is immune from prosecution.

9. In her order last month, Chutkan, who was appointed by President Barack Obama, said that Trump's appeal "automatically stays any further proceedings that would move this case towards trial or impose additional burdens of litigation" on Trump.

10. However, it does not appear to explicitly bar the filing of court papers or prohibit prosecutors from providing information to the defense

11. the case had been paused, but they said the government would "continue to meet its own deadlines as previously determined"

12. Fatso Steven Chunk [California state university] Citing "outrageous conduct," the Republican presidential candidate's attorneys told U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan

13. Fatso Chung Citing: "In this manner, the prosecutors seek to weaponize the Stay to spread political propaganda, knowing that President Trump would not fully respond because the Court relieved him of the burdens of litigation during the Stay," the lawyers wrote. "Worse, the prosecutors have announced their intention to continue this partisan-driven misconduct indefinitely, effectively converting this Court's docket into an arm of the Biden Campaign."

14. Fux News: Trump files 'powerhouse' motion calling for Special Counsel Jack Smith to be held in contempt of court

15. Fatso Chung Citing Cheung [Trump fat ass spokesman] explained that, "as a result, President Trump is seeking to hold Deranged Jack in contempt of Court."

16. More than 1,230 people have been charged with federal crimes in the riot, ranging from misdemeanor offenses like trespassing to felonies like assaulting police officers and seditious conspiracy. Roughly 730 people have pleaded guilty to charges, while another roughly 170 have been convicted of at least one charge at a trial decided by a judge or a jury

17. About 750 people have been sentenced, with almost two-thirds receiving some time behind bars. Prison sentences have ranged from a few days of intermittent confinement to 22 years in prison

18. More than 300 Jan. 6 defendants have been charged with the obstruction offense, and so has Trump in the federal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith. Lawyers representing rioters have argued the charge was inappropriately brought against Jan. 6 defendants.

19. The justices will hear arguments in March or April, with a decision expected by early summer. At least two defendants have convinced judges to delay their sentencings until after the Supreme Court rules on the matter

20. This only from 4 properties: "He gets it [MONEY] from everybody!" Trump’s businesses—which he never fully divested from—received at least $7.8 million in payments!

YouTube Video 📹 Outlines Trump’s Guilt...

https://youtu.be/TlDzPWN8z68?si=-mNu2lAIx0kKc9Gu

1. Trump has IMMUNITY from prosecution for His OFFICIAL ACTS?

2. He's not immune from being a traitor, conspiring an Insurrection and fomenting a REBELLION, MOTHERFUCKER!!!

3. Trumps arguments are he didn't commit insurrection, well he's missing a word, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof

4. Rebellion definition: Rebellion has multiple definitions:

• Armed resistance; An act of armed resistance to a government. This can be an open, organized, and armed defiance of an established government.

• Opposition; A defiance of or opposition to any kind of authority or control. This can include a refusal to accept some authority, code, or convention.

• Change the government; An effort by many people to change the government or leader of a country by the use of protest or violence.

• Replace goals; When an individual replaces goals, as well as means, that are accepted by their society with goals, as well as means, that are not accepted by their society

1. Mark Meadows was informed by SYMPATICO company "Ken" that proved the election was accurate and there wasn't fraud

2. Trump Criminal Attorney's site FEDERALIST PAPERS 65, not the Constitution and want to use HAMILTON'S thoughts as citations... fuck off!

3. Pg.23,

4. Alina Bahaba, Trump lawyer is a ho and references dershoweitz Allen the guy who got massages at Epstein Caribbean hideaway

5. His name is on pg. 78, why? 7x on jet logs, a 14yr. Old driven by Maxwell to mara lardo, come on of course, Trump denies as usual... he's a liar and knows what to say. "If women r deeply troubled, they're the best in bed" why would Bill Barr lie about Jeffrey Epstein, since he knew how he died... Tucker interview is telling, DOJ knows...

6. Trump, "they're waiting and then realized I'm hot", ur diapers r hot w stank, that's hot...

1. ArtIII.S3 TREASON / 18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason

2. : Treason against the United States consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

3. aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000

4. For the first time in our nation's history, a grand jury has charged a former president with committing crimes while in office to overturn an election that he lost. In response, The defendant claims that to protect the institution of the presidency, He must be cloaked With absolute Immunity from criminal prosecution unless the house impeached and the senate convicted him for the same conduct. He is wrong. Separation of powers principles, constitutional text history and precedent all make clear that a former President may be prosecuted for criminal acts. He committed violent office, including most critically here. Illegal acts to remain in power despite losing an election.

5. The presidency plays a vital role in our constitutional system. But so does the principle of accountability for criminal acts, particularly those that strike at the heart of the democratic process. Rather than vindicating our constitutional framework, the defendant sweeping immunity claim threatens to license presidents president to commit crimes to remain office. The founders did not intend and would never have countenance. Such a result. And multiple safeguards ultimately Enforced by the article three courts Protect against any potential burdens on the presidency the defendant claims to fear.

6. The defendant asserts that this prosecution "threatens threatens to shatter the very bedrock of our Republic." To the contrary: It is the defendants claim That he cannot be held to answer for the charges that he engaged in an Unprecedented effort to retain power through criminal means despite having lost the election, That threatens the democratic and constitutional foundation of our Republic. This court should affirm and issue the mandate Expeditiously to further the public's and the defendants compelling interest in a prompt resolution of this case.

7. Statement of the issues: Whether the defendant Is a moon from federal prosecution for crimes committed while he served as president of the united states

8. Whether the defendant's impeachment in the house, followed by a quiddle in the senate precludes his criminal prosecution.

9. Factual and procedural background; The defendant lost the 2020 presidential election nonetheless, according to a later grandeur indictment in the week's following the election. He conspired to use knowingly false claims of election fraud with the goal of overturning the legitimate results of the election and disenfranchising Millions of voters.

10. Summary of argument: The defendant, a former President, does not enjoy immunity from federal prosecution for the offenses charged in this case. under separation of powers analysis. The president's unique constitutional status provides immunity from civil liability for official conduct, See nixon versus fitzgerald, but it does not render a former president immune from criminal liability when charged with violations of generally applicable federal criminal Is liability when charged with violations Of generally applicable federal criminal statutes. Any burdens of post presidency criminal liability have minimal impact on the functions of an incumbent and are await by the Paramount. Public interest in upholding the ruled law through federal prosecution. constitutional text historical practice and other community doctrines confirmed that conclusion.

11. The defendant's acquittal at an impeachment trial does not bar this prosecution under either the impeachment

1. In US law, "color of office" is when a public official acts under the appearance of authority but exceeds that authority. It can also refer to someone acting as an employee of a government unit but taking unauthorized action

2. Jack Smith Government's Motion in Limine 12.28.2023: "The court has the responsibility to maintain decorum in keeping with the nature of the proceeding, The judge is not a mere moderator, But is the governor Of the trial For the purpose of assuring It's proper conduct"

3. A court's obligation to focus the trial and to maintain proper order extends to appropriate limits on the scope of cross examination.

4. Significantly here - Where the defendant repeatedly has levied baseless political claims evidence or argument that serves only to support a jury nullification Argument has no relevance to guilt or innocence and must be excluded

5. The court should exclude evidence in argument that does not bear on the guilt or innocence

6. The court should prohibit the defendant from introducing evidence, making arguments or framing questions to advance a theory of selective or vindictive prosecution, Or 2 otherwise improperly eject politics into the trial

7. The defendant should be precluded from raising irrelevant political issues or arguments in front of the jury

8. The court should prohibit the defendant from trying to basically inject politics into the trial and the same of impeaching the investigation

9. He intends to impeach the integrity of the investigation by raising wholly false claims such as the government's non existent coordination with the biden administratiand other empty allegations recycled from the selective and vindictive prosecution motion that he based on an anonymous source

10. The court should prohibit evidence questions or argument regarding potential consequences of the defendant's criminal case or conviction. As in any other case, the consequences that the defendant may face as a result of the criminal case against him are irrelevant to guilt or innocence. And may not be considered by the jury.

11. The court should exclude irrelevant and prejudicial evidence And argument regarding January 06, 2021. Throughout this litigation and in his public comments, the defendant has sought to blame others for the attack on the capital, for which he is responsible, including law enforcement military forces. Unidentified secret agents and foreign influence. The defendant should be precluded from introducing within the courtroom. The disinformation he has propagated outside of it.

12. The defendant has signaled his intention to blame the events of January 6th on the capital Police, Is national guard, And the district's mayor.

13. A bank robber cannot defend himself by blaming the bank security guard for failing to stop him. a fraud delondon cannot claim to the jury that his victims should have known better than to fall for his scheme. and the defendant cannot argue that the law enforcement should have prevented the violence he caused and obstruction he intended.

14. The court should exclude evidence regarding purported undercover officers officers or government sources at the capital.The defendant also Appears poised to blame undercover agents government informants or confidential human sources.

15. The court should exclude evidence of alleged foreign Influence

16. samuel-lazar-jan-6- insurrectionist, after Jan. 6, Lazar “realized that he had been swept up in the false narrative spun by the President of the United States” and that he had “blindly followed President Trump’s cry to ‘fight like hell to take back the country.’”

17. Missing binder last seen by Trump, Mark Meadows contained raw intelligence the US and its NATO allies collected on Russians and Russian agents, including sources and methods that informed the US government’s assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to help Trump win the 2016 election

1. Trump said that his efforts to overturn Joe Biden’s victory were part of his “duty as President.” “desperate attempt to short circuit our Great Constitution”

2. "Almost everybody agrees, even most of the crazed Radical Left Lunatics, that the Colorado decision is political delusion, and that I am, separately, fully entitled to PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY, without which Crooked Joe Biden, whose Deranged Prosecutor, Jack Smith, is merely serving his bosses wishes, would be prosecuted for destroying our Country," Trump burped and blathered

3. First and foremost, Trump's job wasn't to get involved with elections and coerce election officials. PERIOD!

4. The Constitution doesn't explicitly grant the president civil or criminal immunity. However, the Supreme Court's interpretation of Article II, Section 2, Clause 3 has developed the privilege of presidential immunity over time

5. Colorado court said it had found "clear and convincing evidence that President Trump engaged in insurrection"

6. Saturday Filing Trump Ambulance Chasers: “The structure of our government, the text of the Constitution and its early commentators, common-law immunity doctrines, our political history, the Supreme Court’s analogous immunity doctrines, and the policy considerations rooted in the separation of powers all dictate that no President, current or former, may be criminally prosecuted for his official acts unless he is first impeached and convicted by the Senate,”

7. “Nor may a President face criminal prosecution based on conduct for which he was acquitted by the U.S. Senate,” he added. “The indictment against President Trump is unlawful and unconstitutional. It must be dismissed.”

8. Faithfully execute laws, Convene Congress, Report to Congress, Recommend measures

9. Section 2, The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments,

10. The president has absolute immunity from civil lawsuits for acts performed within the "outer perimeter" of their official capacity. However, it's legally untested

11. According to Article III, Section 3, a person is guilty of treason if he or she goes to war against the United States or gives “aid or comfort” to an enemy. He or she does not have to physically pick up a weapon and fight in combat against U.S. troops.

12. Trump defense which is stupid, “The indictment of President Trump threatens to launch cycles of recrimination and politically motivated prosecution that will plague our Nation for many decades to come and stands likely to shatter the very bedrock of our Republic — the confidence of American citizens in an independent judicial system,” Trump’s attorneys wrote in a brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals

13. “They all reflect President Trump’s efforts and duties, squarely as Chief Executive of the United States, to advocate for and defend the integrity of the federal election, in accord with his view that it was tainted by fraud and irregularity,” they said

14. Trump’s lawyers have suggested that he had a good faith basis to be concerned that fraud had affected the election

15. Trump and McDaniel called Monica Palmer and William Hartmann, the two GOP canvassers in Michigan Wayne County. new and significant legal peril to the former president

16. Trump and Ronna McDaniel — Offering a thing of value to a public official to violate oath of office = a crime

17. Timothy Parlatore, “Seems selective,” he's a moron and an allie of Trump, don't believe a word he says! Much like the Georgia call, an individual sentence without context can seem misleadingly incriminating, but context matters

18. Timothy Parlatore "DOJ Is the Wrong Agency to Investigate Mishandling or Spillage of Classified Documents"

19. X President Donald Trump attempted to coerce 2 MAGA CULT Republicans of Michigan.

1. The SCOTUS doesn't have authority to pick another President, the constitution stands alone, they should stay out of this argument!!!

2. Is senator Reverdy Johnson Worried that the final version of section 3 did not include the office of the presidency. He stated quote this amendment does not go far enough end quote, Because past rebels may be elected President or vice President of the United States 1866. So he asked why did you admit to exclude them I do not understand Them to be excluded from the privilege of holding the 2 highest offices in the gift of the nation he replied. Let me call the senator's attention. To the words or hold any office simple or military under the United States. This answer satisfied. Senator Johnson who stated perhaps I am wrong as the exclusion from the presidency. No doubt I am but I Was misled by noticing the specific exclusion in the case of senators and representatives this click boWas misled by noticing the specific exclusion in the case of senators and representatives this colloquy Further support the view that the drafters of the amendment intended to phrase any office to be broadly inclusive and certainly to include the presidency

3. Moreover, reconstruction era citizens supporters and opponents of section 3 alike understood section 3 disqualified oath. Breaking insurrectionist from holding THE office of the President.

4. The clear purpose of section 3 is to ensure that disloyal officers could never again play role in governing the country. This leaves no room to conclude. That officer of the United States was used as a term of art. The drafters of section 3 were motivated by a sense of betrayal. That is by the existence of a broken oath, not by the type of officer who broke it.

5. The presidential oath is an oath to support the Constitution. We consider whether the oath taken by President to preserve protected and defend the Constitution isn't hoped to support the Constitution of the United States. The district court found that because the presidential oats language is more particular than the old reference in section three, the drafters did not intend to include former presidents we disagree. There argument fails because the president Is an executive officer of the United States under article 6 I'll be at 14 whom a more specific oath is prescribed

6. Pg. 102 January 6 were actions and a product of President Trump's conduct and singling out vice President pence for refusing President Trump's demand the vice President declined to carry out his constitutional duties in short, the record amply established that the events of January 6 constituted, a conservative and public use of force or threat a force by a group of people to hinder or prevent the US government from taking the actions in this area to accomplish the peaceful transfer power in this country. This constituted an insurrection.

7. Substantial evidence in the record show that even for the November 2020 general election, President Trump was laying the groundwork for a claim that the election was rigged. For example, August 17, 2020 campaign rally. He said the only way we're going to lose this election is if the election is rigged.

8. Pg. 116 President Trump's speech on January 6 was not protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. President trump contends at his speech on J6 was protected by 1st amendment, the Courts concluded, it was not.

9. Does the US constitution authorize states To assess the constitutional qualifications of presidential candidates, the supreme court concludes that it does. Under article 2 section one, each state is authorized to appoint presidential electors. In such manner as the legislator thereof may direct

10. Pg 14 Analysis

11. Lastly, we consider and reject, President Trump's argument that his speech on January 6 was protected by the First Amendment.

12. In interpreting a constitutional provision, our goal is to prevent the evasion of the provisions legitimate operation.

1. Hunter Biden just called the MAGA CULTs bluff, they're shameless and transparent in their schemes

2. Jack Smith in Washington DC Files CIPA RULE 6 HEARING 12.12, PLEADING CIPA SECTION 6 A for classified information.

3. Jack Smith files expedited WRIT OF CERTIORARI based on a FORMER PRESIDENTS IMMUNITY CLAIMS

4. Government summary of anticipated expert testimony: Experts 1, 2, 3 are mapping and analysis solution. Use it to make maps, to analyze data, and to share and collaborate

5. Expert 1: plotted the location history for Google location history and devices associated with individuals who moved around on January 6th

6. Expert 2: The processes in determining device location, historyand graphical representation

7. Expert 3: extracted data from Whitehouse cellphone used by Trump and Defendant 1, who is that? Images associated with cells, websites and of course Twatter accounts used on/before and after January 6th

1. Trump’s decision not to testify again was a “smart” or the “least destructive move” and was legally “the least dangerous thing” for him to do in the case, his attorneys conceded

2. Trump latest speech in front of Republicans young? Bill Barr "Will not be his Attorney General in his administration, Bill just relax, Let them know we're not gonna look at the election, and u don't get impeached, and that Bill Barr is a stiff" and of course Matt Gates was there, praising Bannon, Boris Epshteyn and the rest of the traitors.

3. I'm glad I was reminded about Trump's response to PANDEMIC, if it wasn't the China flu and another biological attack, chemical or nuclear attack, what response would Trump had. Besides his PR campaign and turning the response against each other. Instructing the CDC to stop warning Americans.

4. The real issues here are, Trump and the MAGA cult do not or ever understood what is good for the nation, now we're arguing over what other national security information Walt Nauta should have in Florida stolen documents case. Just like he didn't concede the "stolen election" he's now trying to continue to rape this country more and burn the entire house down, over a BIG LIE and that's it folks!!

5. Trump latest motion to halt everything: "As a result of these authorities, all current deadlines must be held in abeyance until, at minimum, this motion is resolved," Trump's team wrote.

6. This isn't "ELECTION INTERFERENCE" this IS/WAS a COUP DETAT

7. "THEN-PRESIDENT TRUMP" Who says he ever was President

8. Refusal to concede his loss in 2020

9. Then President Trump waged a campaign to remain in power by publicly and privately pressuring state and local officials to overturn 2020 elections

10. Trump in speeches quote: "I will look at it at the time" regarding election reporter says, people are rioting in the streets, will u commit to a peaceful transfer of power? Trump quote: "we're gonna have to see what happens, u know I've been complaining about ballots, get rid of the ballots, there won't be a transfer of power, there'll be a continuation"

11. Trump QUOTE: "He'll be a dictator on day 1"

12. Alex Jones back on Twatter with the blessings of Musky odor, and ur wondering what's wrong with that site? If he was in attendance at a party, I'd turn around and walk out, what's the difference, he's there and spewing his nonsense

13. Kevin McCarthy retirement, good riddance and he should've never been an elected representative. PERIOD GO back to making sandwiches, sandwich maker 🥪

14. This is the Government’s problem, unqualified people doing important work.

15. Case and point, subpoenaed SCOTUS and their pimps, Leonard Leo and Clarence Thomas sugar daddy Harlan Crowe

16. Why are Americans are going hungry despite a strong economy?

17. James Comer: Special counsel’s new Hunter Biden charges are a ‘cover-up’

18. “Next year’s election will be a choice between President Biden’s proven track record of lowering costs and delivering for middle class families, and Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans’ bleak vision of dividing us,” Biden campaign spokesman

19. Immigration is the key here, Americans want a reign on people coming here and shitting all over Americans, whatever that means, and Trump knows it, and that's what Americans want. They don't want to see anti semiticism or anti Americanism, which could be parallel. They don't want to Arabs denouncing Americans to their faces on US soil or disrespectful of our cultures. PERIOD!

20. Vivek Is a Swarmi, he should be investigated and silenced for furtherance of conspiracy theories and that's what's wrong with MAGA, 9.11 and J6 "were in inside job" is he kidding me? Of course he isn't, that's his platform and the GOP leadership stance...

21. Liz Cheney QUOTE: "I expressed my view that having Mike Johnson as speaker, and having this Republican majority in charge, you can't count on them to defend the constitution at this moment," 🇺🇸⚓️

1. JACK SMITH NOTICE OF EVIDENCE: WILL INTRODUCE EFFORTS OF AGENTS [RUSSIAN BORN ASSET] BORIS EPSHTEYN to OBSTRUCT ELECTION 🇺🇸⚓️

2. Mike Johnson Speaker of the House, his Amicus Brief stated fraud in the election and Trump wanted a list of who was on board and who would sign. This guy is a traitor and must resign!

3. Speaker Johnson calls an Insurrection "participants in the event of that day" he can't even call it for what it was or is, how can this traitorous traitor be 2nd in line to the seat of the presidency? He wants to blur the Insurrectionist faces from the DOJ... His words, what IA wrong with this religious zealot?

4. Regarding Johnson trying to get her to sign on to insurrection, Cheney tone was too defiant regarding 4 hour conference

5. "Republicans will not stand up to Trump" if he violates the constitution

6. Cheney says, that Trump indicated if the military issued anymore statements "that the military would not be involved in the election" [as is law] Trump would fire them

7. Cheney quote, "Trump is unfit and shouldn't be anywhere near the Whitehouse"

8. Jack Smith issues a template for what Trump did and how he's going to prosecute

9. Trump in speeches quote: "I will look at it at the time" regarding election reporter says, people are rioting in the streets, will u commit to a peaceful transfer of power? Trump quote: "we're gonna have to see what happens, u know I've been complaining about ballots, get rid of the ballots, there won't be a transfer of power, there'll be a continuation"

10. Trump QUOTE: "He'll be a dictator on day 1"

11. Trevian Cutty, Co conspirator in RICO CASE threatened Ruby Freiman again and states Trump allies are a MILITIA... Oh really, tell us more ho...

1. Trump QUOTE: "He's been waging an all out war on Democracy!" just yesterday in Iowa

2. Chutkan Opinion QUOTE: "Whatever immunities a sitting President may enjoy, the United States has only one Chief Executive at a time, and that position does not confer a lifelong 'get-out-of-jail-free' pass"

3. "Former Presidents enjoy no special conditions on their federal criminal liability."

4. Trump Defense Motion QUOTE: "He could not be prosecuted for actions he performed while in the White House, and that his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results were at "the heart of his official responsibilities as President,"

5. Pg 33: The indictment therefore properly alleges Defendant's statements were made in furtherance of a criminal scheme!!!

6. US appeals court Trump must face lawsuits over US Capitol attack, determining Trump's criminal liability in the current and future civil cases against him, to include the US Capitol Police

7. Donald Trump must face civil lawsuits over his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol by his supporters, rejecting the former president's claim that he is immune

8. “Today’s ruling makes clear that those who endanger our democracy and the lives of those sworn to defend it will be held to account,” Patrick Malone, a lawyer for the officers

9. Judge Sri Srinivasan in the written opinion, "does not spend every minute of every day exercising official responsibilities. And when he acts outside the functions of his office, he does not continue to enjoy immunity from damages liability just because he happens to be the President."

10. Trump has tried to argue that a president's speech on a matter of public concern, such as allegations of vote fraud, should be considered an official act of the president. The court rejected that argument.

11. "When a sitting president running for re-election speaks in a campaign ad, that is usually on a matter of public concern. Yet he does so in an unofficial, private capacity as office-seeker, not an official capacity as office-holder," the opinion said. "Actions taken in an unofficial capacity cannot qualify for official-act immunity."

12. Georgia RICO CASE attorneys for Trump's conspirators, are arguing for a demure because the Prosecutors didn't identify which part or whole of the "oath of office did they violate?" This is the problem, because the constitution doesn't say u can't make up fake electors and try to pass them on as real electors, they should get a pass... the Constitution stands alone, ur job is to PROTECT, DEFEND it while ur an employee, that's it ...

13. Mark Meadows and Clark are still arguing for their trials to b moved to federal courts and they're motioning to delays till forever... criminals is what they are!

14. At an event in Cedar Rapids, Trump's campaign passed out signs reading 'BIDEN ATTACKS DEMOCRACY'

15. "Joe Biden wants to make this race a question of which candidate will defend our democracy and protect our freedoms," Trump said. "This campaign is a righteous crusade to liberate our republic from Biden and the criminals."

16. Ron DeSantis campaign bus, 'never baacj down' in large letters, this is the problem with the GOP.LED cult

17. Trumps possible defense, Russia was behind the election interference claims... so which is it? Trump said, PUTIN wasn't involved and the believes his "STRONG AND POWERFUL" denial... he can't have his cake and eat it too... King Trump 🤴. If he believed putin, he wasn't doing his job once again... now he wants to say it was Russia interfering in election 2016/2020

18. Oldy but a goody, Jack Smith requested Trump's Twitter information to include everything, IP address, contacts, people who used account besides him, searches, location information

19. Fuck that, all of his apps he used is what we need... as the president, it's public information

20. January 6th trial should be AI avatars to protect identity