
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today, we’re talking about change, big and small, and how philosophy can help us better handle it when it comes.
Timestamps:
Heraclitus – 1:59
Epictetus – 7:46
L.A. Paul – 14:12
Sources:
The fragments of the work of Heraclitus of Ephesus on nature
The Internet Classics Archive | The Enchiridion by Epictetus
What You Can't Expect When You're Expecting
FOMO, or fear of missing out, pervades modern life. But does constantly creating, experiencing, and doing actually create a fulfilled life? In this episode, we look at all the ways missing out can actually be the best thing we can do for ourselves.
Timestamps:
Seneca – 3:29
Berlin – 9:49
Agamben – 15:37
Sources:
“On the Shortness of Life”
Seneca, On the Shortness of Life
Isaiah Berlin (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Isaiah Berlin, “TWO CONCEPTS OF LIBERTY,” Four Essays On Liberty, (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1969)
Bartleby, The Scrivener
Giorgio Agamben - Bartleby, or On Contingency
Reviewing everything we’ve explored over the past season of episodes.
Traveling is informative, relaxing, and fun. But there’s a dark side to the tourism industry, that’s rife with opportunities for abuse – how can we then make sure to be good tourists? In this episode, we examine what moral responsibilities people have while traveling, and we question what role businesses should play in tourism ethics.
Timestamps:
Henry Shue — 3:14
Holmes Rolston III — 15:42
David Fennell — 23:20
Milton Friedman — 25:56
Sources:
Who drank all the matcha? How tourism drained a Japanese town
Hawaii's Governor Asks Tourists To Stay Away Because Of COVID
Hawaii's 'overtourism' becomes growing debate as West Maui reopens for visitors - ABC News
Henry Shue on the Dahrendorf Symposium 2013
Basic Rights by Henry Shue
The Father of Environmental Ethics | 225 Years | University of Pittsburgh
Rolston Interview
rolston-holmes-iii-environmental-ethics.pdf
Tourism Ethics
Milton Friedman on Donahue
The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits
Classic summer blockbusters like Jaws, ET, and Stand by Me are a great way to kick off summer — but underneath the summer fun, these movies illustrate fascinating philosophy concepts. This episode, we’ll analyze clips from these movies and use them as a jumping off point to talk about three philosophical concepts. No need to watch them beforehand, and each portion of this episode is self-contained, so use the timestamps to start at whichever movie you’d like.
Timestamps:
Jaws — 1:16
Stand by Me — 9:12
ET — 14:50
Sources:
Anthropocentrism | Human-Centered Philosophy & Ethics | Britannica
Memento mori | Meaning, Symbols, & Facts | Britannica
The meditations of Marcus Aurelius
Theory of Mind | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
What does it mean to watch real-life suffering for entertainment? In this episode, we examine the ethics of true crime to determine when true crime is justice, and when it veers into voyeurism.
Timestamps:
Nussbaum — 6:25
Catharsis — 13:00
Sontag — 17:26
Sources:
The True Crime Consumer Report by Edison Research and audiochuck
JonBenet Ramsey's dad hopes for answers as new documentary puts pressure to solve 1996 murder
Poetic justice : the literary imagination and public life : Nussbaum, Martha C. (Martha Craven), 1947- : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Monster: Jeffrey Dahmer: Did TV go too far in 2022?
The Poetics of Aristotle, by Aristotle
REGARDING THE PAIN OF OTHERS Susan Sontag
Karen Read jury remains at 16 people, selection to continue for 10th day
Virtue signaling is a term that continues to be thrown around in a variety of contexts — from people’s bumper stickers to companies’ social media logos — but what really is virtue signaling, and is it something worth critiquing? We take a pause to look closer at virtue signaling, from unpacking definitions of virtue signaling and virtue to evaluating whether virtue signaling is a virtue or a vice.
Timestamps:
Aristotle — 2:57
Kant — 13:29
Westra — 20:36
Sources:
Meet the man who made six figures selling anti-Elon Musk Tesla stickers
Tesla owner tells why she hands out anti-Elon Musk bumper stickers
Aristotle (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Aristotle's Ethics
Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Books 1-5
Immanuel Kant - German Philosopher, Enlightenment, Critique of Pure Reason | Britannica
Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, First Section
Evan Westra (Purdue University) - PhilPeople
Virtue Signaling and Moral Progress
From doctors to lawyers, nearly every profession has an ethical code—but what about influencers? This week, we look at the philosophical literature out there on influencers to see if there’s any limit to what an influencer can post. Along the way, we’ll build the beginnings of an ethical code for influencers, and we’ll get a better idea of who we want to follow — and even how we want to lead — on social media.
Timestamps:
Other Professions — 3:18
Authenticity — 7:48
Social Good — 11:16
Sources:
I Became the Most HATED Body Positivity Influencer – My Side of the Story
YouTube punishes Logan Paul over Japan suicide video
The Ethics of Influencer Marketing: Authenticity and Disclosure
The Ethical Tightrope: Navigating Authenticity in Influencer Marketing - Life360
Constructing Authenticity: Social Media Influencers and the Shaping of Online Identity
Research Perspectives on Social Media Influencers and their Followers
New Directions in the Ethics and Politics of Speech
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
Tax season is officially behind us, but was the government just doing its job, or were the taxes you paid theft? In this episode of Just Questions, we dive into the ethics of taxation to answer this question. Using John Rawls’ veil of ignorance and Robert Nozick’s Wilt Chamberlain argument, we explore a famous philosophical debate on taxation and cover two radically different views on fairness, ownership, and what a just state looks like.
Timestamps:
Rawls — 1:56
Nozick — 10:18
Sources:
The Myth of Ownership
A Theory of Justice
John Rawls
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
Robert Nozick
As self-driving cars take over our roadways, a pressing question still remains: when a crash is unavoidable, who should they protect? In this episode, we’ll navigate the toughest ethical dilemmas autonomous vehicles face in life-or-death scenarios, exploring the leading philosophical theories on how these cars should be programmed to react.
Timestamps:
Minimizing harm — 4:22
Protecting the passenger — 7:13
Protecting the public — 9:04
Consent — 10:58
Equality — 12:30
Risk — 14:50
Sources:
Men harass woman taking driverless Waymo car in San Francisco
Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars
The ethics of crashes with self‐driving cars: A roadmap, I
Why Everyone Has It Wrong About the Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles
Autonomous Driving Ethics: from Trolley Problem to Ethics of Risk
From the publisher's feed