In new episode of the #JustTalk_World we are speaking about:
🟢Victim-oriented approach in the context of war crimes, committed in armed conflict – what is the experience of its application in other countries?
🟢What evidence is needed to prove Conflict-related Sexual Violence (CRSV) and why the working with victim is key to providing it?
🟢What does the experience of other armed conflicts tell us: how to restore justice for the victims of the CRSV? What exactly is this justice means?

Guest: Martin Hackett, Expert of EU funded Project "Pravo-Justice", International Prosecutor, who worked as Head of the War Crimes Prosecution Unit for the Republic of Kosovo and Senior Trial Counsel for the UN prosecuting terrorist offences within a Middle East context.
Moderator: Eugene Krapyvin, content editor of JustTalk, expert of JustGroup, експерт з кримінальної юстиції.
________________________________
📌 Key topics:
0:00 – Intro
02:57 – To what extent is the Ukrainian justice system capable of dealing with large-scale war crimes committed during the Russian-Ukrainian war?
 06:47 – What should be the government’s strategy for working with victims of CRSV: how to involve victims into the investigation?
13:10 – What should be the communication strategy of the pre-trial investigation bodies and the prosecutor’s office regarding victims of CRSV? How to explain to them that the result will not be “tomorrow”, but in a month and years?
16:48 – On the re-traumatization of the victims and ways to avoid it
22:22 – How should an investigator, a prosecutor communicate with a victim? Are they supposed to be psychologists, emotionally involving into events?
26:04 – What evidence of CRSV is key to proving guilty beyond reasonable doubt? Is it really to send the indictment to the court without the conclusion of the forensic medical examination?
32:24 – What evidence remains key in the case when we do not have forensic medical examination report?
36:47 – Is it possible for district court judges to hear war crimes cases? Is there not a threat of their bias here, because there is a war in the country?
41:46 – What does it mean – “justice for victims of the CRSV”? How can justice be restored?
46:56 – Some advices on informing the society about the need to file war crimes claims: how to gather information “from the field” as much as possible?
51:05 – Q&A: What to do if a person at a certain stage of the proceedings refuses to participate in it?
54:36 – Q&A: What to do with those who want to help, but actually do more harm in some places? For example, NGO’s, media and other non-state actors.
57:33 – Q&A: Is there any difference between offline/online victim participation in the courtroom?
01:00:41 – Q&A: How do you feel about the idea of ​​a special war crimes court?
01:04:57 – Q&A: Is “command responsibility” possible in the CRSV, although Ukrainian legislation does not recognize this concept of international criminal law?
01:06:54 – Final remarks.
________________________________
Episode in Ukrainian: https://youtu.be/Lezi521XLUc
Written features from guest in Ukrainian: https://justtalk.com.ua/post/seksualne-nasilstvo-povyazane-zi-zbrojnim-konfliktom-inozemnij-dosvid--justtalk-world-epizod-6

#JustTalk #JustTalk_World

У новому відео #JustTalk_World йдеться про:
🟢Підхід, орієнтований на потерпілих від сексуального насильства, вчинених в умовах збройного конфлікту – який досвід його застосування в інших країнах?
🟢Які докази потрібні для доказування СНПК і чому ключовою в тому, щоб їх забезпечити, є потерпіла особа?
🟢Про що говорить досвід інших збройних конфліктів: як відновити справедливість для потерпілих від СНПК? В чому саме полягає ця справедливість?

Спікер: Мартін Хаккетт, експерт Проєкту ЄС «Право-Justice», старший радник ООН з питань переслідування за злочин тероризму в контексті Близького Сходу.
Модератор: Євген Крапивін, контентний редактор JustTalk, експерт JustGroup, експерт з кримінальної юстиції.
________________________________
📌 Ключові моменти: 
00:00 – Вступ
02:50 – Наскільки українська система правосуддя здатна дати раду масштабним воєнним злочинам, вчинених в умовах російсько-української війни
06:41 – Якою має бути стратегія органів влади стосовно роботи з потерпілими від СНПК: як залучити потерпілих до розслідування?
13:00 – Якою має бути комунікаційна стратегія органів досудового розслідування і прокуратури стосовно потерпілих від СНПК? Як пояснити потерпілій особі, що результат буде не «завтра», а через місяці й роки?
17:15 – Про повторну травматизацію потерпілої особи та способи її уникнення
22:11 – Як слідчому, прокурору спілкуватись із потерпілою особою? Чи мають вони бути психологами, емоційно заглиблюватись у ситуацію?
25:55 – Які докази СНПК є ключовими для доведення вини? Чи дійсно без висновку судово-медичної експертизи обвинувальний акт не варто направляти до суду?
32:07 – Які докази у випадку відсутності висновку судово-медичної експертизи стають ключовими?
36:32 – Чи можуть судді районних судів розглядати справи про воєнні злочини? Чи немає тут загрози їх упередженості, адже в країні триває війна?
41:26 – Що є правосуддям для потерпілих від СНПК? Яким чином може бути відновлено справедливість?
46:37 – Поради стосовно інформування населення про необхідність звертатись із заявами про воєнні злочини: як максимально зібрати інформацію «з полів»?
50:41 – Секція питань і відповідей. Що робити, якщо людина на певному етапі провадження відмовляється від участі в ньому?
54:14 – Секція питань і відповідей. Що робити з тими, хто хоче допомогти, але насправді подекуди більше шкодить? На кшталт, громадських організацій, журналістів та інших недержавних субʼєктів.
56:55 – Секція питань і відповідей. Чи є якась різниця між участю потерпілої особи у залі судових засідань офлайн/онлайн?
01:00:06 – Секція питань і відповідей. Як ви ставитесь до ідеї спеціального суду для розгляду воєнних злочинів?
01:04:10 – Секція питань і відповідей. Чи можлива «командна відповідальність» у СНПК, хоча українське законодавство і не визнає цієї концепції міжнародного кримінального права?
01:05:17 – Заключні слова
________________________________
Мова епізоду: українська (синхронний переклад з англійської).
Відео оригінальною мовою (англійською): https://youtu.be/d_Wci8u791w
Текстовий матеріал доступний за посиланням: https://justtalk.com.ua/post/seksualne-nasilstvo-povyazane-zi-zbrojnim-konfliktom-inozemnij-dosvid--justtalk-world-epizod-6

#JustTalk #JustTalk_World

 📣 Who should investigate crimes of police officer, when they already committed? What models on independent investigative agencies exist in the world? How can we reach the independency of this agencies for efficient investigation? 

🗣 To this question we've tried to find answers in the third episode of #JustTalk_World podcast “Who polices the police?”

 🗯 Guests: Ian Scott – former director of the Special Investigations Unit in Ontario, Canada. Masha Lisitsyna – senior managing legal officer with the Accountability division at the Open Society Justice Initiative. 

💬 Moderator: Eugene Krapyvin, JustTalk. Research “Who Polices the Police? The Role of Independent Agencies in Criminal Investigations” (in English): https://www.justiceinitiative.org/publications/who-polices-the-police-the-role-of-independent-agencies-in-criminal-investigations 

 📣 Who should investigate crimes of police officer, when they already committed? What models on independent investigative agencies exist in the world? How can we reach the independency of this agencies for efficient investigation? 

🗣 To this question we've tried to find answers in the third episode of #JustTalk_World podcast “Who polices the police?”

 🗯 Guests: Ian Scott – former director of the Special Investigations Unit in Ontario, Canada. Masha Lisitsyna – senior managing legal officer with the Accountability division at the Open Society Justice Initiative. 

💬 Moderator: Eugene Krapyvin, JustTalk. Research “Who Polices the Police? The Role of Independent Agencies in Criminal Investigations” (in English): https://www.justiceinitiative.org/publications/who-polices-the-police-the-role-of-independent-agencies-in-criminal-investigations 

👮 Preventing police torture without mentioning “human rights” even once: in the second episode of JustTalk World we talk about compliance with procedural guarantees as a component of police efficiency and Custody Records — an innovative system for recording all actions against detainees.

Our guests:

🇺🇦 Yuriy Byelousov — prosecutor at Prosecutor General's office, the Head of the Department of Procedural Guidance in Criminal Proceedings on Torture and Other Serious Violations of Citizens' Rights by Law Enforcement Bodies;

🇨🇭 Ben Buckland — Senior Advisor at the Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT).

The discussion is moderated by Eugene Krapyvin, an expert of the Centre for Policy and Legal Reform.

👍 Follow us on other platforms: @justtalk_ua on Twitter and Instagram, JustTalk on Facebook

Yuriy Byelousov @yuriy.byelousov on Facebook

Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine @GP_Ukraine on Twitter

Ben Buckland @bsbuckland on Twitter

Association for the Prevention of Torture Geneva @apt_geneva on Twitter

Eugene Krapyvin @eugene_krapyvin on Twitter

Centre for Policy and Legal Reform @pravo_center on Twitter

#JustTalk_World #CustodyRecords #Police #TorturePrevention

👮 Preventing police torture without mentioning “human rights” even once: in the second episode of JustTalk World we talk about compliance with procedural guarantees as a component of police efficiency and Custody Records — an innovative system for recording all actions against detainees.

Our guests:

🇺🇦 Yuriy Byelousov — prosecutor at Prosecutor General's office, the Head of the Department of Procedural Guidance in Criminal Proceedings on Torture and Other Serious Violations of Citizens' Rights by Law Enforcement Bodies;

🇨🇭 Ben Buckland — Senior Advisor at the Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT).

The discussion is moderated by Eugene Krapyvin, an expert of the Centre for Policy and Legal Reform.

👍 Follow us on other platforms: @justtalk_ua on Twitter and Instagram, JustTalk on Facebook

Yuriy Byelousov @yuriy.byelousov on Facebook

Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine @GP_Ukraine on Twitter

Ben Buckland @bsbuckland on Twitter

Association for the Prevention of Torture Geneva @apt_geneva on Twitter

Eugene Krapyvin @eugene_krapyvin on Twitter

Centre for Policy and Legal Reform @pravo_center on Twitter

#JustTalk_World #CustodyRecords #Police #TorturePrevention

Investigative interview's aim is to replace "traditional" interrogation for the increasing efficiency of Law Enforcement agencies and it is a global world trend. The investigative interview directs Law Enforcement officers to conduct a full investigation of the crime and prevents the premature conclusions in the case.

In addition, investigativel interview is one of the most efficient method of preventing torture, as it is not focused on obtaining confession.

How does the transition from interrogation to investigative interview in Ukraine and other countries of the world is going? What exactly does it help in the investigation, and what arguments to use to convince Law Enforcement officers of the resultiveness of this instrument?

We talked about this and other things in our first podcast of the #JustTalk_World with Ukrainian and international experts.

Speakers:
🇨🇭 Andra Nicolescu — Senior Legal and Policy Adviser, Association for the Prevention of Torture (Switzerland)
🇺🇦 Taras Filonenko — Detective of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (Ukraine)
Moderator: Eugene Krapyvin — Еxpert at the Centre for Policy and Legal Reform (Ukraine)

Research on the implementation of investigative interview in Ukraine down below:
https://www.irf.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/investigationresearch_web.pdf

Investigative interview's aim is to replace "traditional" interrogation for the increasing efficiency of Law Enforcement agencies and it is a global world trend. The investigative interview directs Law Enforcement officers to conduct a full investigation of the crime and prevents the premature conclusions in the case.

In addition, investigativel interview is one of the most efficient method of preventing torture, as it is not focused on obtaining confession.

How does the transition from interrogation to investigative interview in Ukraine and other countries of the world is going? What exactly does it help in the investigation, and what arguments to use to convince Law Enforcement officers of the resultiveness of this instrument?

We talked about this and other things in our first podcast of the #JustTalk_World with Ukrainian and international experts.

Speakers:
🇨🇭 Andra Nicolescu — Senior Legal and Policy Adviser, Association for the Prevention of Torture (Switzerland)
🇺🇦 Taras Filonenko — Detective of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (Ukraine)
Moderator: Eugene Krapyvin — Еxpert at the Centre for Policy and Legal Reform (Ukraine)

Research on the implementation of investigative interview in Ukraine down below:
https://www.irf.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/investigationresearch_web.pdf