
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This is a very close case.
The trial judge granted the state's motion suppress evidence. The appellate court abruptly reversed.
Go to Case to Find Out More.
The difference between knowing conduct and intentional conduct is not great. It causes problems in this case.
Go to Show Notes.
Case Discussed
See People v. Willet, 2015 IL App (4th) 130702 (08/04/2015)
Law Discussed
Aggravated Battery to a Child - 720 ILCS 5/12-3.05(b)(1)
Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction - IPI 5.01A - Knowing Condcut
Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction - IPI 5.01B - Intentional Conduct
Similar Prior Episodes
Usful Resources
See the Show Notes.
Case Discussed
See People v. Lofton, 2015 IL App (2d) 130135 (07/24/2015)
Law Discussed
Show discusses 725 ILCS 5/115-10.1, the Admissibility of Prior Inconsistent Statements, section of the Illinois Code of Criminal Procedure.
Similar Prior Episodes
Prior Podcast Episode 052 of the Criminal Nuggets Podcast is also discussed.
Usful Referenes
Two methods of impeachment are discussed, the RAC (Recommit, Accredit, Confront) and CCC (Commit, Credit, Confront) systems.
Direct Link to the Diagram: Two Step Formula to Avoid Prior Inconsistent Statement Error Diagram.
This PDF accompanies and makes sense after you listen to Podcast 085.
Go to Case Notes!
This is an oral summary of the top Illinois Criminal Court cases for July 2015.
Visit IllinoisCaseLaw.com
for more legal resources.
Go To Show Notes
An expert witness new foundational element is being implemented by Illinois trial judges. This is their way of dealing with unreliable expert testimony.
See People v. Jones, 2015 IL App (1st) 121016 (04/22/2015).
Download Current Case List.
Check Out Available CLE.
Go to Show Notes.
Dispute over how broad a prosecutor's authority reaches leads to supression of drug evidence.
It turns out, a prosecutor was using an investigor hired by his office to conduct drug investigations.
The appellate court looked at whether the law actually authorized this type of use of county investigator services.
Download current Case List.
Go to show Notes.
The Illinois Supreme Court has put to rest the question of how to answer when the jury asks for a definition to “prove beyond a reasonable doubt.”
We here in Illinois do not provide a jury instruction on the meaning of the definition of beyond a reasonable doubt...
Download the current case list Now.
From the publisher's feed