
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Welcome back to Star Wars Beyond the Films!
This week’s discussion is about Star Wars publishing.
Is it better having a series written by one author, co-authored, or multiple authors?
Mark tries out a new recording room this week, and Nathan keeps outing himself this month.
Did Legacy of the Force not do well because the authors didn’t pick up each other’s stories? Did it leave the reader feeling disconnected? Nathan says the unthinkable… INTERCHANGABLE!?!!!
They focus on the FotJ series and the styles of each author. Does the post NJO suffer from a Denning thick direction? Or does this strengthen that end of the era having one author being the backbone of the plots?
Nathan touches on the WARS series, the direction the writters take with that series, and how it plays out.
When authors pick up on elements from one story and use those in the next you feel like the story is connected. One author vs co authors argument is that they focus on whether a reader can tell when the author shifts during the story. Nathan explains the process of story writing in Star Wars when he wrote his Tales story.
Do co-authored books constantly evolve as a series is written? Do ideas generate as the writing team works? This could for some plots to be forgotten about as the story progresses.
Is there more pay off in a larger series or a smalle one? Should authors spell things out? Should things be left so wide open that multiple answers can be seen? Though this could cause fan fights across fandom.
This week’s topic makes both hosts want to pull their hair out.
Can multiple author trilogies work if each focuses on separate points of views? For instance one takes the Jedi, one takes the Sith, and another takes the Empire/Galactic Alliance. Could that work?
Nathan calls out Zahn over the planning of Mara and Luke’s marriage all along.
By Star Wars Beyond the Films4.2
160160 ratings
Welcome back to Star Wars Beyond the Films!
This week’s discussion is about Star Wars publishing.
Is it better having a series written by one author, co-authored, or multiple authors?
Mark tries out a new recording room this week, and Nathan keeps outing himself this month.
Did Legacy of the Force not do well because the authors didn’t pick up each other’s stories? Did it leave the reader feeling disconnected? Nathan says the unthinkable… INTERCHANGABLE!?!!!
They focus on the FotJ series and the styles of each author. Does the post NJO suffer from a Denning thick direction? Or does this strengthen that end of the era having one author being the backbone of the plots?
Nathan touches on the WARS series, the direction the writters take with that series, and how it plays out.
When authors pick up on elements from one story and use those in the next you feel like the story is connected. One author vs co authors argument is that they focus on whether a reader can tell when the author shifts during the story. Nathan explains the process of story writing in Star Wars when he wrote his Tales story.
Do co-authored books constantly evolve as a series is written? Do ideas generate as the writing team works? This could for some plots to be forgotten about as the story progresses.
Is there more pay off in a larger series or a smalle one? Should authors spell things out? Should things be left so wide open that multiple answers can be seen? Though this could cause fan fights across fandom.
This week’s topic makes both hosts want to pull their hair out.
Can multiple author trilogies work if each focuses on separate points of views? For instance one takes the Jedi, one takes the Sith, and another takes the Empire/Galactic Alliance. Could that work?
Nathan calls out Zahn over the planning of Mara and Luke’s marriage all along.

38,867 Listeners

29,541 Listeners

54 Listeners

323 Listeners

59,665 Listeners

425 Listeners

2,852 Listeners

395 Listeners

223 Listeners