<a target="_blank" href="https://www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/154487/open_sms">Send a text</a>The Court Below granted relief when it should have not.Judge Niemeyer of the 4th Circuit was the lone dissent--contending that the majority had defied AEDPA’s standard of review--the 84 year old Jurist with 36 years service on that court was correct.

Send a text The Court Below granted relief when it should have not. Judge Niemeyer of the 4th Circuit was the lone dissent--contending that the majority had defied AEDPA’s standard of review--the 84 year old Jurist with 36 years service on that court was correct.

<a href="https://www.buzzsprout.com/twilio/text_messages/154487/open_sms" rel="noopener noreferrer">Send a text</a>The Court Below granted relief when it should have not.Judge Niemeyer of the 4th Circuit was the lone dissent--contending that the majority had defied AEDPA’s standard of review--the 84 year old Jurist with 36 years service on that court was correct.

KLEIN v. MARTIN (AEDPA STANDARDS AGAIN)

Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients.&nbsp; *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

News

Education

Government

Politics

Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the podcast is a useful resource for members of the public who want to understand the legal issues of the day, prospective law students who want to get to know legal language and understand good legal writing, and attorneys who can use the podcast to be better advocates for their clients.  *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

Share KLEIN v. MARTIN (AEDPA STANDARDS AGAIN)

Sign up to save your podcasts

KLEIN v. MARTIN (AEDPA STANDARDS AGAIN)

KLEIN v. MARTIN (AEDPA STANDARDS AGAIN)

More shows like Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

Advisory Opinions