Episode 53 : Bike : Cadence Wars Spin Fast or Push Hard? The Science of Pedaling 🚴♂️
💬 Got a question or feedback? Write us at: [email protected]
☕ Buy a Gel Caf for Lactate to support the work: ko-fi.com/lactate
Summary: The century-long debate between grinding a heavy gear and spinning a light one is finally settled by modern biomechanics. Manipulating your pedaling rate dictates a complex trade-off between peripheral muscular stress and central cardiovascular demand ; lower cadences require massive torque that recruits highly fatigable fast-twitch (Type II) muscle fibers, burning precious glycogen and accumulating fatigue byproducts. Conversely, higher cadences lower the torque threshold, allowing your nervous system to rely on efficient, fat-burning slow-twitch (Type I) fibers, which preserves localized carbohydrate stores ; however, this shifts the burden centrally, exponentially increasing the work of breathing and heart rate. While elite riders with massive VO₂max engines can sustain 95-105 RPM to protect their legs , amateur cyclists should avoid over-spinning and locate their personal metabolic equilibrium. You can find your optimal bioenergetic intersection using a heart rate decoupling test: hold a moderate power output for 10 minutes each at 70, 80, and 90 RPM, selecting the cadence that yields the lowest stable heart rate without intense muscular burning ; avoid low-cadence grinding on flats to prevent patellofemoral joint damage, and stop actively pulling up on the pedals, focusing instead on a powerful downstroke. Your optimal cadence is a dynamic target that scales upward as you push higher watts ; furthermore, extreme high-cadence cycling can induce diaphragm failure, triggering a respiratory metaboreflex that steals blood flow from your legs. This physiological reality explains Lance Armstrong’s legendary 2001 Alpe d'Huez attack, where his hyper-kinetic 90-105 RPM spin weaponized his cardiovascular system to drop Jan Ullrich’s brutal 75-80 RPM mashing.
Keywords: cycling cadence, biomechanics, glycogen sparing, torque, vo2max, fast-twitch fibers, cycling economy
🎙️ Lactate, the podcast that deciphers science to improve your performance.
Key references :
Ahlquist, L. E., Bassett, D. R., Shikcy, R., et al. (1992). The effect of pedaling frequency on glycogen depletion rates in type I and type II quadriceps muscle fibers during submaximal cycling exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 65(4), 360-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00243516
Dunst, A. K., Hesse, C., & Ueberschär, O. (2024). Changes in force-velocity and power-velocity relationships with increasing work rate up to maximal oxygen uptake and to assess the resulting alterations in optimal cadence. Frontiers in Physiology, 15, 1343601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1343601
Foss, Ø., & Hallén, J. (2004). The most economical cadence increases with increasing workload. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 92(4-5), 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1175-5
Mitchell, U. H., et al. (2019). The Impact of Cycling Cadence on Respiratory and Hemodynamic Responses to Exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 51(8), 1627-1636. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001960
Nimmerichter, A., Eston, R., Bachl, N., & Williams, C. (2012). Effects of low and high cadence interval training on power output in flat and uphill cycling time-trials. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 112(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1957-5
Takaishi, T., Yamamoto, T., Ono, T., Ito, T., & Moritani, T. (1998). Neuromuscular, metabolic, and kinetic adaptations for skilled pedaling performance in cyclists. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 30(3), 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199803000-00016
Voices generated by artificial intelligence from the scientific report produced by the Lactate team.
