
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Nahata v Robertson [2023] NSWSC 642
The plaintiffs (Himanshu Nahata and Priyanka Jain) wanted to construct a duplex on their land. To do so, they needed to put in storm water drainage, that would have to go through their neighbour's land.
The neighbours, Russell & Stana Robertson, did not agree to grant an easement over their land. Among their reasons for refusing was that the construction works would dig up and destroy existing concrete paths, shed and retaining wall.
The plaintiffs applied to the Court for the easement. Were they successful?
Special appearance from Evie Chapman who found this case to be very boring.
By Tanya ChapmanNahata v Robertson [2023] NSWSC 642
The plaintiffs (Himanshu Nahata and Priyanka Jain) wanted to construct a duplex on their land. To do so, they needed to put in storm water drainage, that would have to go through their neighbour's land.
The neighbours, Russell & Stana Robertson, did not agree to grant an easement over their land. Among their reasons for refusing was that the construction works would dig up and destroy existing concrete paths, shed and retaining wall.
The plaintiffs applied to the Court for the easement. Were they successful?
Special appearance from Evie Chapman who found this case to be very boring.

37,595 Listeners

85 Listeners

21 Listeners

897 Listeners

759 Listeners

113,121 Listeners

1,331 Listeners

351 Listeners

534 Listeners

779 Listeners

1,314 Listeners

454 Listeners

907 Listeners

227 Listeners

2,536 Listeners