
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Nahata v Robertson [2023] NSWSC 642
The plaintiffs (Himanshu Nahata and Priyanka Jain) wanted to construct a duplex on their land. To do so, they needed to put in storm water drainage, that would have to go through their neighbour's land.
The neighbours, Russell & Stana Robertson, did not agree to grant an easement over their land. Among their reasons for refusing was that the construction works would dig up and destroy existing concrete paths, shed and retaining wall.
The plaintiffs applied to the Court for the easement. Were they successful?
Special appearance from Evie Chapman who found this case to be very boring.
By Tanya ChapmanNahata v Robertson [2023] NSWSC 642
The plaintiffs (Himanshu Nahata and Priyanka Jain) wanted to construct a duplex on their land. To do so, they needed to put in storm water drainage, that would have to go through their neighbour's land.
The neighbours, Russell & Stana Robertson, did not agree to grant an easement over their land. Among their reasons for refusing was that the construction works would dig up and destroy existing concrete paths, shed and retaining wall.
The plaintiffs applied to the Court for the easement. Were they successful?
Special appearance from Evie Chapman who found this case to be very boring.

37,621 Listeners

77 Listeners

19 Listeners

812 Listeners

769 Listeners

113,049 Listeners

1,338 Listeners

310 Listeners

560 Listeners

773 Listeners

1,163 Listeners

389 Listeners

974 Listeners

252 Listeners

2,353 Listeners