January 5, 2026. Luxembourg

At this point in time, there is no functioning victim infrastructure and no clear pathway to help for those of us being subjected to technologically driven persecution by private contractors. The tone of distress in this letter reflects the reality that there are no police tools, no legal pathway without a report, and no accessible toxicology for continuous exposure. Without law enforcement recognition and a criminal report, there is no access to legal remedy, and plausible deniability makes most events illegible until a pattern can be proven. Detection tools for low‑dose toxic exposure are scarce, which means that by the time anyone can verify what has been happening, people have already been harmed or killed. In the meantime, this system continues operating inside ordinary communities while the general public, and even most advocates and researchers, only see fragments of what is going on.

I am sharing this letter to show how what is happening is being described and how assistance is being requested when no victim infrastructure exists. You may not be in the same position I am. You may be at a different phase, earlier or later, or experiencing different methods or impacts. Adapt the language to reflect what is happening to you, remove what does not apply, and add details that are specific to your situation.

This letter is provided as a practical example of how to write to attorneys, elected officials, medical professionals, oversight bodies, or others when you are trying to explain what is happening and ask for help. Its purpose is to give people language they can use.

I am also posting this letter as a contemporaneous record in case anything should happen to me. My Substack and my website are intended to function as an archive of what has been reported, when, and to whom, and as a resource for journalists, advocates, and investigators.

Contemporaneous letter and sample language

This is a letter sent today to a Washington, D.C. based civil and human rights attorney; the addressee’s name and identifying details have been removed to protect his confidentiality and privacy.

I am writing to follow up on my earlier correspondence. Since those messages, I have been able to articulate with greater precision both the nature and the gravity of what is occurring, not only to me but to others similarly situated.

In addition to unlawful, technology based surveillance and intrusive monitoring of my devices, I am being subjected to a coordinated campaign of harassment, psychological torture, and chemical suppression through repeated low level exposure to volatile organic compounds. These exposures appear calibrated to degrade neurological, cognitive, and physiological functioning over time, and they carry clear risks of organ damage, genetic injury, and death. The pattern suggests a form of extrajudicial elimination: destabilizing and incapacitating targets so that they cannot organize, seek counsel, or access remedies, while causing fatal harm without visible or easily attributable evidence. Because these chemicals are difficult to detect and require immediate testing, there is effectively no access to police reports, courts, or reliable medical documentation, and no functioning victim infrastructure at all.

Over the past six months, I have fled across ten U.S. states and then to multiple European countries, only to encounter the same pattern replicated with remarkable consistency in each jurisdiction. This strongly indicates a transnational repression network in which private contractors appear to have supplied both technological systems for surveillance and coordination and the personnel to operate them, while also deputizing civilians. These operations appear to exploit legal and regulatory gaps, including those within the Wassenaar Arrangement and related export control regimes, allowing private actors to engage in conduct that would be unconstitutional or unlawful if carried out directly by state actors, and to do so without meaningful oversight or accountability.

Because it became clear that I could not escape what appears to be a global network of repression, I was forced to seek asylum in Luxembourg. The targeting has not stopped. The same patterns of surveillance, harassment, and chemical exposure are continuing within the asylum process itself. I am genuinely afraid that I may not survive long enough to secure protection, obtain competent medical evaluation, or pursue any legal remedy, either for myself or for others. Continuous toxic exposure combined with psychological torture and the absence of any victim facing mechanisms makes time a critical factor.

I recognize the complexity of these claims and the difficulty of conveying them. It has taken months of continuous exposure, flight, and research to find language that accurately reflects what is occurring. I am renewing my request for assistance because the situation is now life threatening, and because your experience with complex, precedent setting civil rights and national security matters uniquely positions you to help shape an appropriate legal and institutional response. Even if direct representation is not possible, guidance on immediate protective steps or referral to colleagues with relevant expertise would be invaluable.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Respectfully,

Tamara

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit drtamaradixon.substack.com