Another public commenter, Justin Spiehs, just suffered his third major legal defeat in federal court—this time, a judge slammed his lawsuit as full of holes and lacking facts. Spiehs, known for disruptive behavior at county meetings—including profanity and obscene signs—claimed he was targeted for exercising his First Amendment rights, but Judge Julie Robinson rejected that. She ruled public comment periods are limited forums with rules about decorum and relevance, and Spiehs couldn’t prove he was singled out. Plus, the deputies who arrested him had qualified immunity and acted lawfully. With 13 lawsuits filed in three years and 10 still active, Spiehs’ pattern of litigation continues—even as his lawyer also represents another free speech plaintiff recently convicted of interfering with police.
Listen in comfort:
Get a discount on a Soli Pillow: http://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.
This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.
Sources:
https://www2.ljworld.com/news/public-safety/2026/sep/17/frequent-public-commenter-loses-another-federal-lawsuit-county-officials-did-not-violate-his-civil-rights-judge-rules/
More coverage & latest updates:
https://sources.thednn.ai/54d5a8b020e0d60b