Have you ever wondered why defamation cases are so challenging to win in the United States?

We take a look at this complex area of law, prompted by a question from Vladimir, a law student in Croatia. Vladimir's curiosity about the comparative strength of defamation laws between the USA and other countries sets the stage for an enlightening discussion on the subject

Defamation, which encompasses both libel and slander, is a tort that allows individuals to sue for reputational harm caused by false statements. However, the elements required to prove defamation in the United States are stringent. The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant made a false statement of fact about them, that this statement was made to a third party, and that the plaintiff's reputation suffered as a result. These elements are deeply rooted in common law and have evolved through various statutes and landmark cases.

One of the most significant factors influencing defamation cases in the USA is the First Amendment, which fiercely protects freedom of speech and freedom of the press. This constitutional backbone makes it particularly difficult to succeed in defamation lawsuits, especially against publications.

The landmark case of New York Times vs. Sullivan further complicated matters by establishing that a plaintiff must prove 'actual malice' to win a defamation suit against a news organization. This means that the plaintiff must show that the publication knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

Our discussion also touches on the challenges lawyers face when taking on defamation cases. These cases are notoriously hard to win, often requiring significant Time and financial investment with no guarantee of success. As a result, many lawyers are hesitant to take them on, and plaintiffs may struggle to find representation.

Despite these challenges, understanding the intricacies of defamation law is crucial for anyone interested in legal studies or the protection of free speech. By examining the elements of defamation, the impact of the First Amendment, and the precedent set by New York Times vs. Sullivan, we gain a clearer picture of why defamation cases are so complex in the United States.

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law