Legislation – Houstonius

Legislation – Houstonius

By Lester LangdonBusinessInvesting
Download on the App Store

Legislation – Houstonius episodes

  • Gov. Abbott signs Squatter Legislation

    Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed two key anti-squatting laws passed by the Texas Legislature: Senate Bill 38 and Senate Bill 1333. These measures aim to close legal loopholes, accelerate property recovery for owners, and eliminate long civil court delays when removing unauthorized occupants.

    Key Anti-Squatting Bills

    1. Senate Bill 1333 (Immediate Removal & Penalties)

    • Law Enforcement Intervention: Empowers sheriffs and constables to remove squatters directly upon receiving a sworn complaint from a property owner stating that an unauthorized person has taken unlawful possession.
    • No Civil Delay: Property owners no longer have to wait through multi-month eviction processes if the occupant was never a legal tenant or leaseholder.
    • Targeting Lease Fraud: Upgrades criminal penalties for creating or presenting false lease documents, deeds, or fraudulent authorization.
    • Real Estate Scams: Makes it a felony to market, list, or accept payment for renting/selling real estate without legal ownership or clear authorization.
    • 2. Senate Bill 38 (Eviction Streamlining)

      • Strict Timelines: Sets uniform requirements requiring courts to hold eviction proceedings within 21 days of a petition being filed.
      • Summary Judgment: Allows courts to expedite cases via summary judgment when facts regarding tenancy status are undisputed, reducing court backlogs.
      • Summary of Impact

        Aspect
        Old Standard
        New Anti-Squatting Framework
        Law Enforcement Role
        Civil matter; police often refused to act without court eviction order.
        Officers can directly remove squatters upon receiving a sworn affidavit.
        Eviction Timeline
        Months of judicial delay.
        Fast-tracked trial within 21 days or immediate police removal for non-tenants.
        Fake Lease Scams
        Treated as basic civil dispute or low-level misdemeanor.
        Upgraded criminal penalties, including felonies for selling or leasing property without authority.

        7 min
      • Requirements to see a property

        Starting January 1, 2026, real estate brokers in Texas are legally mandated to secure a written agreement before showing a residential property to a potential buyer.

        This regulation, established by the Texas Occupations Code, ensures that the relationship between the agent and the client is clearly defined prior to any tours.

        Depending on whether the broker is representing the individual or simply providing access, they must utilize specific 

        Texas REALTORS® forms to remain compliant. Every agreement is required to

        explicitly state the services provided,

        a specific termination date,

        and the negotiable nature of commissions.

        By formalizing these terms early, the law protects both parties by clarifying exclusivity and compensation expectations.

        These guidelines serve as a vital framework for professional conduct and regulatory adherence within the Texas housing market.

        Click here – to download the short form for Buyer Rep Agreement to see any home.

        4 min
      • HUD New ESA Memorandum

        What are the key changes in the HUD memorandum?

        According to the provided sources, the HUD memorandum issued on May 22 introduces several shifts in how assistance animal accommodation requests are handled, even though the core legal framework remains the same.

        The key changes highlighted in the memorandum include:

        • HUD Enforcement Interpretation: There is a change in how HUD interprets the enforcement of existing regulations.
        • Internal Complaint Processing: The memorandum affects the internal procedures for how complaints regarding assistance animals are processed.
        • Focus on Training and Tasks: There is new discussion and guidance regarding the training and specific tasks that assistance animals perform.
        • Shift in Guidance Reliance: The 2025–2026 period is characterized by “Policy Uncertainty,” including reports of guidance withdrawal and a reduced reliance on prior notices, such as the FHEO-2020-01. This has led to increased legal variability for housing providers.
        • What Has Not Changed

          It is important to note that the memorandum does not change the underlying law. The following elements remain stable:

          • The Fair Housing Act (FHA): The Act itself has not changed.
          • Reasonable Accommodation Framework: The basic legal structure for requesting and granting accommodations is still in place.
          • Disability Protections: Existing protections for individuals with disabilities remain the same.
          • Case-by-Case Evaluations: Housing providers are still required to evaluate each request on its own individual merits.
          • In summary, while the legal protections for persons with disabilities remain intact, the operational interpretation and enforcement strategies used by HUD are the primary areas of change.

            What is the impact of training and tasks guidance?

            The guidance regarding training and tasks represents a significant shift in HUD’s enforcement interpretation and is a primary driver of the current period of “Policy Uncertainty” (2025–2026) for housing providers.

            Based on the sources, the impact of this new guidance includes:

            • Shift in Enforcement Interpretation: The memorandum introduces new discussions specifically centered on the training and tasks assistance animals perform, which is marked as a key departure from previous internal processing.
            • Increased Legal Variability: Because HUD is reporting the withdrawal of certain guidance and a reduced reliance on prior notices (such as FHEO-2020-01), housing providers face more legal variability when determining how to evaluate the necessity of an animal’s specific tasks.
            • Operational Risk: This shift contributes to a move away from the “Operational Standard” held between 2020 and 2024, where verification protocols were more clearly defined by HUD guidance. Now, the interpretation of these requirements is changing, making consistent and defensible documentation of decisions even more critical for rental housing teams.
            • While these discussions around training and tasks are changing HUD’s interpretation, the sources emphasize that the Fair Housing Act (FHA) itself remains stable, and the requirement for case-by-case evaluations has not changed.

              What documentation can be required from applicants under new guidance?

              Under the new guidance and the current period of “Policy Uncertainty” (2025–2026), the specific documentation requirements for assistance animals are shifting, though the goal remains to verify the legitimate need for an accommodation.

              Based on the sources, housing providers can require documentation that addresses the following:

              • Authenticity and Personal Knowledge: Verification efforts now focus heavily on affirming the authenticity of the document and ensuring that the healthcare provider has personal knowledge of the applicant and their disability-related need.
              • Provider Letters with Specific Information: While the sources note that there is a “reduced reliance on prior notices” (like FHEO-2020-01), they emphasize that provider letters should still contain specific information to be considered valid.
              • Legal Attestation: Applicants can be required to provide a legal attestation regarding the truthfulness of their request.
              • The “Interactive Process”: Documentation is often requested as part of an “Interactive Process,” where the housing provider and applicant engage in a dialogue to determine the necessity of the accommodation.
              • Guidance on Unreliable Documentation

                The sources highlight that housing providers should be cautious of certain types of documentation that may not meet the necessary criteria:

                • Online ESA Mills: Documentation consisting of certificates purchased online without a genuine provider relationship is flagged as a concern.
                • Purchased “Boilerplate” Letters: Generic, boilerplate letters sold specifically to bypass pet policies are often insufficient to establish a legitimate need.
                • Because HUD is reporting the withdrawal of some previous guidance, the sources suggest that housing teams must focus on maintaining consistent and defensible processes for evaluating this documentation to manage increased operational risk.

                  What is the impact of the Interactive Process?

                  The Interactive Process serves as a critical framework for evaluating assistance animal requests, particularly during the current period of policy uncertainty. According to the sources, its impact is primarily seen in how it facilitates verification and manages risk for housing providers.

                  The key impacts of the Interactive Process include:

                  • Fraud Identification and Non-Responsiveness: A significant outcome of following this process is the ability to identify fraudulent requests. If an applicant fails to respond during the interactive dialogue or if fraud is discovered, the process allows the housing provider to clearly notify both parties that the request will be treated as a pet rather than an assistance animal.
                  • Requirement for Legal Attestation: As part of this process, applicants are required to provide a legal attestation regarding the truthfulness of their accommodation request, which adds a layer of accountability and helps ensure the request is legitimate.
                  • Defensible Compliance: Utilizing the Interactive Process ensures that determinations are 100% aligned with HUD, ADA, and Fair Housing guidelines. This helps housing teams maintain “defensible compliance” and reduces the risk of legal challenges .
                  • Standardization of Reviews: By following this HUD-defined process, platforms like PetScreening can provide a consistent and documented path for every request, which is essential for managing the increased legal variability reported in 2025–2026.
                  • In essence, the Interactive Process moves the evaluation from a simple document check to an active engagement that ensures only those with legitimate, verified needs receive the accommodation.

                    Can pet rent be charged for assistance animals?

                    Based on the sources, the answer depends on whether the animal is a verified assistance animal or is determined to be a pet through the evaluation process.

                    Under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), which the sources emphasize has remained stable despite new HUD guidance, the following rules apply:

                    • No Pet Rent for Verified Assistance Animals: Because the “Reasonable Accommodation Framework” and “Disability Protections” have not changed, assistance animals are not considered pets. Therefore, housing providers cannot charge pet rent, pet fees, or pet deposits for a verified assistance animal.
                    • Treatment as a Pet if Denied: The sources state that if a request for an assistance animal is found to be fraudulent, or if the applicant fails to respond during the “Interactive Process,” the housing provider can notify the parties that the animal will be treated as a pet. In these specific cases, pet-related fees and rent would be permitted.
                    • Stable Legal Obligations: While there is “Policy Uncertainty” regarding how to evaluate requests and a “reduced reliance on prior notices,” the core legal obligation to provide reasonable accommodations without pet-related charges remains in effect.
                    • In summary, as long as the animal meets the criteria for an assistance animal under the stable FHA framework, it is exempt from pet rent. This remains a top concern for housing teams, which is why the sources recommend maintaining a consistent and defensible process for evaluating every request.

                      How should housing teams evaluate requests for multiple assistance animals?

                      Housing teams should evaluate requests for multiple assistance animals by applying a Reasonableness Test based on HUD guidance to determine the validity of the requests. According to the sources, there are four primary criteria and common concerns for housing teams to consider:

                      • Household Ratio: Teams should evaluate the reasonableness of the total number of animals within a single household, such as a situation where five residents each request an Emotional Support Animal (ESA).
                      • Nexus to Disability: Providers need to understand the “nexus,” or connection, between the multiple animals and the specific disability. This is particularly relevant when an applicant requests two or more ESAs for a single disability, as the team must determine why more than one animal is necessary to meet that single need.
                      • Timing and Sequence of Requests: The evaluation should take into account when the requests are made, especially if there are sequential accommodation requests or if multiple requests are submitted shortly after a resident moves in.
                      • Case-by-Case Evaluations: Despite the complexity of multiple requests, the fundamental requirement to conduct individual, case-by-case evaluations remains unchanged under the Fair Housing Act.
                      • By focusing on these criteria, housing teams can manage the increased legal variability of the current “Policy Uncertainty” period while ensuring they remain in defensible compliance.

                        What is the Reasonableness Test for multiple animal requests?

                        Explain the difference between the 2020 and 2025 standards.

                        How can teams identify fraud during the Interactive Pro

                        6 min
                      • Emotional Support Animals

                        Must a prospective apartment tenant be treated differently if that prospective tenant has an emotional support animal

                        Yes, under both federal and Texas fair housing laws, a prospective tenant with an Emotional Support Animal (ESA) must be treated differently than a standard pet owner.

                        In the eyes of the law, an ESA is not a pet; it is considered an “assistance animal” (a medical tool), similar to a wheelchair or a prescription.

                        1. Key Legal Protections

                        Under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and the Texas Fair Housing Act, landlords must provide “reasonable accommodations” for people with disabilities. This means:

                        • No Pet Fees or Deposits: You cannot charge pet rent, a one-time pet fee, or an additional pet deposit for an ESA.
                        • “No-Pet” Policies Don’t Apply: Even if your property has a strict “no pets” rule, you must generally allow a documented ESA.
                        • No Breed or Weight Restrictions: You cannot deny an ESA based on its breed (e.g., Pit Bulls) or size, unless that specific animal poses a documented safety threat.
                        • 2. What You CAN Ask For

                          You are not required to take the tenant’s word for it. You have the right to request:

                          • An ESA Letter: This must be from a licensed healthcare professional (doctor, therapist, or psychiatrist).
                          • Established Relationship (New for 2026): Recent updates to Texas guidelines emphasize that “ESA certificates” purchased from instant-download websites are often insufficient. You can require that the letter come from a provider with an established therapeutic relationship with the tenant.
                          • Note on Diagnosis: You cannot ask for the tenant’s specific medical diagnosis or their medical records. You can only ask for confirmation that they have a disability and that the animal provides a disability-related benefit.
                          • 3. When Can You Deny an ESA?

                            While the protections are strong, they are not absolute. You may deny the request if:

                            • Direct Threat: The specific animal has a history of aggression or poses a direct threat to the safety of others.
                            • Property Damage: The animal causes “substantial” physical damage to the property that cannot be reduced by another accommodation.
                            • Undue Burden: Accommodating the animal would cause an “undue financial or administrative burden” (though this is a very high bar to prove in court).
                            • Small Owner-Occupied Buildings: If you live in one unit of a building with four or fewer units (the “Mrs. Murphy” exemption), you may be exempt from certain FHA rules.
                            • Summary Table: Pet vs. ESA

                              Feature
                              Standard Pet
                              Emotional Support Animal
                              Status
                              Luxury/Amenity
                              Medical Necessity
                              Pet Deposit/Rent
                              Allowed
                              Illegal
                              Breed Bans
                              Allowed
                              Illegal
                              Required Proof
                              None
                              Licensed ESA Letter

                              4 min
                            • New Texas law about squatters

                              Lester Langdon here.  In the past, several of my clients have had problems with squatters.  Here is a recent article from the Fort Worth Star Telegram, written by Tiffani Jackson

                              Here’s what Texas’ new squatter laws mean for landlords, tenants and homeowners

                              It’s a nightmare scenario for homeowners — discovering that someone has taken up residence in your property without permission, and finding out the process to remove them is anything but simple.

                              Lawmakers say squatting has become a growing problem in Texas, frustrating property owners and leaving law enforcement with limited options.

                              To address it, Gov. Greg Abbott signed two new laws this summer that make it easier to clear squatters from private property and add tougher penalties for fraud and trespassing. “Texas is facing a squatting crisis, with property owners struggling to evict delinquent tenants or remove people who were never supposed to be on their property in the first place,” Abbott said in a news release. Critics, however, warn the measures could blur the line between squatters and struggling tenants behind on rent. Whether you’re a landlord, homeowner or tenant, here’s what to know about how the new laws work.

                              Who is considered a squatter under Texas law? A squatter is someone who occupies property without permission, such as an abandoned home or a residence where they were never granted a lease. Unlike guests who overstay their welcome and may be considered tenants, squatters generally have no lease or rental agreement to protect them. Texas law has long recognized “adverse possession,” which allows someone to claim ownership after occupying land for years under strict conditions, but that process is rare. The more pressing issue for most homeowners is how to quickly remove someone who moves in without consent and refuses to leave. How does the new law change the process?

                              Senate Bill 1333 creates a new legal tool for homeowners: filing a sworn affidavit with the sheriff to request immediate removal of squatters. This bypasses the drawn-out eviction process that usually applies to tenants. The law also ramps up penalties for squatting-related fraud, making it a misdemeanor to present fake deeds and a felony to sell, lease or rent property using fraudulent documents. Property damage caused while trespassing now carries heavier criminal charges, with damage over $1,000 potentially prosecuted as a second-degree felony.

                              Importantly, the expedited removal process does not apply to family members or current/former tenants, it’s focused on unauthorized occupants only. What protections exist if someone is wrongfully removed? Lawmakers built in safeguards for people who are mistakenly evicted under the new process. I

                              If an individual can prove they were wrongfully removed, they can sue the property owner for damages. That includes actual losses, exemplary damages, attorney’s fees, court costs and up to three times the fair market rent of the property. These protections aim to balance property owners’ rights with due process for legitimate occupants.

                              How does the law affect evictions in Texas? Senate Bill 38 targets the court side of eviction proceedings, requiring justice courts to hear cases faster — within 10 to 21 days of filing. It also allows courts to issue summary judgments in clear squatting cases, speeding up removal when the facts are straightforward. The law clarifies how landlords must serve notices to avoid disputes over whether squatters were properly informed. Justice courts are limited to ruling only on possession of the property, not title disputes or broader claims, which keeps cases narrowly focused. The bill also prevents local courts or agencies from altering eviction rules, creating consistency statewide.

                              When do the new laws take effect? SB 1333 took effect on Sept. 1, 2025. SB 38 will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026. Both were passed during the 89th Texas Legislative Session and signed by Gov. Abbott, who said they will give homeowners “an efficient means of evicting squatters from their property.” While squatting cases remain relatively rare, supporters say the laws provide much-needed clarity and faster remedies for property owners.

                              When do the new laws take effect? SB 1333 took effect on Sept. 1, 2025. SB 38 will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026. Both were passed during the 89th Texas Legislative Session and signed by Gov. Abbott, who said they will give homeowners “an efficient means of evicting squatters from their property.” While squatting cases remain relatively rare, supporters say the laws provide much-needed clarity and faster remedies for property owners.

                              6 min

                            About Legislation – Houstonius

                            From the publisher's feed

                            Real Estate Help