University librarians are divided over AI use and ethics | Neural Nexus Daily Episode 03
Welcome to LIBCAST, the podcast for library professionals navigating the future. And you’re listening to our special series, Neural Nexus Daily, where we track the intersection of information, education, and artificial intelligence.
Today, we’re diving into a fascinating new survey that’s sending ripples through the academic library community. The headline? University librarians across the United States are deeply, and I mean deeply, divided over the use and ethics of AI.
The survey, conducted by software development company Helper Systems, paints a picture not of consensus, but of a profession at a crossroads. We have everything from enthusiasm to outright opposition. As one librarian bluntly put it, we might be "educating intelligent youngsters towards dummies." Strong words. So, let's unpack the data.
The report, titled “AI in Higher Education: The librarians’ perspectives,” was based on a survey of 125 academic librarians across the US, from institutions like Texas Tech to the University of California.
And the first major finding is about adoption. Or rather, the lack of it. A surprising two-thirds of the academic libraries surveyed do not offer any AI products to researchers. Only a slim 13% currently do, with another 24% considering it.
But the real division emerges when we talk about ethics. This is the core of the debate. The survey asked a simple question: is it cheating if students use AI products for research?
The answers were split right down the middle. Exactly 50% of librarians said no, it is not cheating. On the other side, 8% gave a definitive 'yes', while a significant 42% felt it was ‘somewhat true’.
This ‘somewhat’ seems to hinge on context. Using ChatGPT to write an entire paper and pass it off as your own? Clearly cheating. But using an AI to generate data sets that a student then analyzes and interprets? Many see that as a legitimate use of a new tool. As one participant noted, what’s appropriate in biological research might not be in the social sciences.
Interestingly, while 8% of librarians believe student AI use is cheating, that number jumps to 12% when asked if it's unethical for professors to use AI for research. A subtle but telling difference.
The report is filled with quotes that truly capture the spectrum of opinion. You have the pragmatists, with one librarian stating, “Once the genie is out of the bottle, you can’t put it back in, so you just have to find a way to grapple with the new reality.”
That sentiment is echoed by tech leaders like Bill Gates, who recently called AI developments “every bit as important as the PC, as the internet.”
Christopher Warnock, the CEO of Helper Systems which conducted the survey, seems to agree. He told University World News, “There is no doubt that AI in higher education is here to stay.” He stresses that librarians, professors, and publishers need to work together to ensure students use these tools ethically, without impeding critical thinking.
And this survey landed just a day before OpenAI released GPT-4, a far more powerful model that can process images and up to 25,000 words of text. The pace of change is relentless, which makes this conversation even more urgent.
But there is also a clear thread of optimism. One of the most hopeful comments came from a librarian who sees promise in AI’s ability to, quote, “replace manual, librarian-led literature searching and systematic reviews... I see AI as a faster, more efficient solution to what is now a very hands-on, time-consuming process.”
Freeing up librarians for more detailed, complex research support. Perhaps that’s the future. Not a replacement for librarians, but a powerful, if controversial, new tool in our toolkit.
The genie is indeed out of the bottle. The question now is, what do we do with its power?
#Libraries, #HigherEd, #Librarians, #Podcast, #AIEthics, #ChatGPT, #AcademicIntegrity, #FutureOfEducation