A controversial clause found in Uber’s contracts for its Ontario drivers is illegal, “unconscionable” and “unenforceable”, the Ontario Court of Appeal declared in a decision released today. The Arbitration Clause declares that all legal disputes between Uber and its Ontario drivers are to be heard in the Netherlands, rather than a local court.
In its decision concerning Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal concluded that “Uber chose this Arbitration Clause in order to favour itself and thus take advantage of its drivers, who are clearly vulnerable to the market strength of Uber” and that the clause “amounts to an illegal contracting out of an employment standard if the drivers are found to be employees.”
Employment lawyer Lior Samfiru, founding partner of Samfiru Tumarkin LLP and one of the lawyers representing David Heller, joined Newstalk 580 CFRA in Ottawa to discuss the recent decision, and what it means for the class action lawsuit against Uber that argues that Uber drivers are actually employees and not independent contractors.
Read Samfiru Tumarkin's release about the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision here.
Read about the decision in The Toronto Star, The Financial Post, and on CBC News.
Employment Issues?
Before you call a lawyer, use the Pocket Employment Lawyer to calculate your potential severance package and find out if you might have a case.
Call 1-855-821-5900, email [email protected] or fill out a contact form to get help from an employment lawyer.
Denied Long-Term Disability?
Discover your rights when your long-term disability claim is denied. Find out more here or use the Pocket Disability Lawyer to find out how we can help.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.