Most of the disagreements that other races have with the white race can be attributed to a perceived lack of empathy on the part of whites. Racism, xenophobia, greed, selfishness, consumerism and so on are all examples of a people who do not spend a lot of time identifying with victims.

The White Race must have done something right, it could not be wrong in everything. This essay looks at what was done right by whites to give them the edge they have in so many areas.

Do you find the division between left and right is not always instructive or useful? Do you find that looking at the world as composed of religious and nonreligious people misleading? The world is divided but the keen observer discovers that the division misleads as much as it instructs. The fact that a person is conservatives does not guarantee he is Christian and the fact that he is Christian does not always mean he is saved or doing works of the spirit. So where ought we to draw the line. Who is with us and who is against us? Is the world even divided or are we as the liberals would have us believe, all in this together?

We The People have more power than we suppose. If We The People took back our power and our right to our property, which includes our political jurisdictions, we could eliminate petty crime, and eventually, all or most crime. Learn how.

There  are good reasons why the left are such good negotiators and why they are always ready to debate an issue, with those willing to re-think their position.

What if all of mankind’s problems stem from race? What if mankind is a racialized species and that different races do not just hate each other they are naturally incompatible? What if a race war could not be avoided and that indeed the growing problems are just the beginning? The races are starting to identify each other and realize there is a deep and irreconcilable division between them? But what if there are only two races and neither has anything to do with skin color? What then? In this discussion Apriorian looks at CRT as a valid way of critiquing history but a flawed way of identifying the groups involved.

It is 2022 and we have the same social problems we had in 1700's, the 500's and before this, in fact society suffers from everything it has suffered with. Perhaps we do not know what we are facing or we are using the source of our problems to solve our problems. Regardless it is obvious we need to re-evaluate who is leading the reform movements and the methods used. One thing is certain, without a new approach our ancestors will still be dealing with the problems the past and present tried to find a solution to.

Why is there war, what is the essential component of war, the feature or event that makes war inevitable? Conventional histories and critiques of war are highly superficial and rationalistic. They are more about exercising hindsight than engaging in an analytics that provide some predictive value. The following is an introduction to the why of war that provides a launching pad for a predictive analytics that can be used by those seeking to understand the why of war.

There is a problem mankind has not solved, the problem is we do not know if our problems all come from the same source or are disconnected and can be solved using individualized solutions. But if we have not even solved this issue do we even understand what a problem is, and if we cannot explain what a problem is how can we solve any of our problems? This fact explains why mankind has been adept at solving technical problems relating to the physical world while his social problems only seem to get worse. This short two page essay changes everything, including the way we arrive at solutions.

The war for reality is a war for your mind, a war about what we value most, and why.