Lomdus On The Amud: Following The Oraysa Schedule

Yevamos 118b: קשה למדא ברי ושמא ברי עדיף

Yevamos 118a: בעניין צרות המכחישות ודיני ממנות

Yevamos 117b: Rav Chaim Brisker on כ"מ דע"א נאמן הוי כשנים

Yevamos 117a: Rav Reuven Grozovsky's Chakira in מדרש כתובה

Yevamos 116b: Rav Aharon Yaffen - Ritva is Lishitaso! - מסרו הכתוב לחכמים

Yevamos 116a: The Bais HaLevi Fascinating Chiddush When בדדמי Applies

Yevamos 115a: Rosh vs Rambam - Do we say Safek Lchumra in Our Sugya

Yevamos 115b: Rav Asher Arieli - In every בדדמי there is a חשש משקר - why מיגו would help

We all know that parents have a mitzvah to educate their children. But then comes a shocking Gemara: A child is eating treif, and the adults aren't obligated to stop him!

What happened to the mitzvah of Chinuch?!

Does Chinuch only require teaching children to perform mitzvos, or must parents also prevent them from committing aveiros? Is a father different from everyone else? And does the obligation change as a child gets older?

The Rishonim offer dramatically different approaches, uncovering a fascinating debate about what the mitzvah of Chinuch actually requires.

A powerful exploration of Tosafos, the Rambam, the Rashba, and the Beis Yosef that challenges everything we thought we knew about Chinuch!

A young child sees a fire on Shabbos and puts it out to help his father. Nobody asked him. Must his father stop him?

The Gemara opens a fascinating debate about a parent's responsibility for a child's actions.

But the real surprise comes from Rav Chaim Brisker's powerful yesod, brought by the Achiezer: Shabbos isn't simply another Torah prohibition. Its unique severity creates an entirely different dimension to a child's violation.

Why might allowing a child to break Shabbos be fundamentally different from allowing him to eat treif?