Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Louisiana v. Callais
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Louisiana v. Callais
Opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_new_jifl.pdf
Case background
These consolidated cases concern whether Louisiana’s new congressional map is
an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. After the 2020 census, a federal court
held that Louisiana’s congressional map likely violated Section 2 of the Voting
Rights Act because it did not include a second majority-minority district. When
the State drew a new map that did include such a district, that new map was in
turn challenged as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Questions Presented
On reargument, the parties were also directed to address whether the State’s
intentional creation of a second majority-minority congressional district
violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments.
Holding
Because the Voting Rights Act did not require Louisiana to create an additional
majority-minority district, no compelling interest justified the State’s use of
race in creating the new map, and that map is an unconstitutional racial
gerrymander.
The Court
Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by Chief Justice
Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Justice Thomas
filed a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Gorsuch. Justice Kagan filed a
dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson.
What this episode contains
This episode is an AI-narrated reading of the majority opinion in
Louisiana v. Callais, written by Justice Alito.
AI disclosure: The voice in this episode is AI-generated, using a machine
learning model styled to loosely resemble the authoring justice. Tone,
inflection, pacing, and emphasis are artifacts of the model and should not be
attributed to Justice Alito. The text being read is the Court’s published
majority opinion, lightly adapted to improve readability for the spoken format.
View all episodes
By So OrderedOpinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-109_new_jifl.pdf
Case background
These consolidated cases concern whether Louisiana’s new congressional map is
an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. After the 2020 census, a federal court
held that Louisiana’s congressional map likely violated Section 2 of the Voting
Rights Act because it did not include a second majority-minority district. When
the State drew a new map that did include such a district, that new map was in
turn challenged as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Questions Presented
On reargument, the parties were also directed to address whether the State’s
intentional creation of a second majority-minority congressional district
violates the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments.
Holding
Because the Voting Rights Act did not require Louisiana to create an additional
majority-minority district, no compelling interest justified the State’s use of
race in creating the new map, and that map is an unconstitutional racial
gerrymander.
The Court
Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by Chief Justice
Roberts and Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. Justice Thomas
filed a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Gorsuch. Justice Kagan filed a
dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Jackson.
What this episode contains
This episode is an AI-narrated reading of the majority opinion in
Louisiana v. Callais, written by Justice Alito.
AI disclosure: The voice in this episode is AI-generated, using a machine
learning model styled to loosely resemble the authoring justice. Tone,
inflection, pacing, and emphasis are artifacts of the model and should not be
attributed to Justice Alito. The text being read is the Court’s published
majority opinion, lightly adapted to improve readability for the spoken format.