LSAT 94 Logical Reasoning Pod Cast

https://www.lsatexpert.com/ Please subscribe to my channel, if the video helped you out, so I can continue to make more LSAT Logical Reasoning Videos. Final Thought Go through 3-5 Study guides (Audio, Books, Website) Read Audio Practice Test Create/ Original Blooms Taxonomy Which one do you understand? Strength/weak? Have an explanation for each answer choice Really does work Physically create your own LSAT Study guide with real Category and selection (highest level). Create your own Binder Slow the Down (If you think you are going slower, go slower.) Now that you heard this information, you may be motivated to go back to the logical reasoning problems or to attempt some new logical reasoning questions. Have Fun on your LSAT Study Journey. This Concludes: LSAT 94 Logical Reasoning Pod Cast

Dapolito: City Council on Rent

P1-15 Local’ communities' rent control increases the price.

P2-15 Local’ communities' rent control decreases the quality.

P3-15 Local’ communities' rent control increases the availability.

Conclusion: Council's objective is NOT to preserve quality ^ availability of local rental

A Close, but impartial investigator is not mentioned, and after looking at Choice C,

choice C is better.

B No, could be an appropriate topic, just not for this conclusion.

C Correct, the city council voters agree with w/the study’s conclusion. Choice C is better than Choice A, because all the information in the answer was in the stimulus.

D This is not mentioned about profiting

E arbitrary based on random choices

Irrational-not appropriate

Dapolito: The city council recently passed a rent-control ordinance. But a recent study of fifteen local communities shows clearly that rent control increases the price and lowers the quality and availability of rental units. Thus, it can be concluded that it is not the city council's objective to preserve the quality and availability of local rentals. 18. Dapolito's conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed? A The recent study of local rent-control ordinances was conducted by impartial investigators. B Rent control is not an appropriate topic for consideration by the city council. C The members of the city council who voted for rent control agree with the study's conclusions about rent control. D Some members of the city council who voted for rent control stand to profit from rent control. E The city council sometimes acts in an arbitrary and irrational manner.

Recommend: Study history to avoid mistakes of the past

P1 Mistakes are unique

P2 Mistakes are unrepeatable

P3 All mistakes are different

Conclusion: Studying history does not avoid repeating mistakes of the past

A No. Wrong misinterpretation (All ?)

B Slightly yes, but not the main conclusion

C Slightly yes again, but not the main conclusion

D No, not the conclusion with Santayana suggestions

E Yes, Double negatives are seen in LSAT questions. This means One should try to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past while studying history.

Flamboyant (of a person or their behavior) tending to attract attention.

Presuppose means to suppose or assume something beforehand, or to take something for granted in advance.

Endorsement is an act of giving one's public approval or support to someone or something.

A No. Incorrect of confrontational and engaging students. It was to flamboyant and confrontational.

B No. does not assume something beforehand, or take it for granted in advanced

C professor does not accept or support this claim made upon him

D Yes, the information is again the identity of Professor Thomas and not the information being reported.

E No. Does not accept or reject the claim of Professor York as too confrontational.

A No. This means few heroes/villains did distort historical information. 100%

B No. Inevitably means unavoidable, meaning certain to happen.

C No. Not that heroes/villains have shaped All of our history. The word all means, 100%

D No. Missing the heroes/villains

E The implication of a few heroes/villains the audience needs to be aware of, in order to understand history modifying history

Mr. Xu: The arctic squirrel gets so cold while hibernating that its blood temperature falls well below the temperature at which water freezes. Although the squirrel's blood is about 70 percent water, the blood never freezes while the squirrel is hibernating. The squirrel's blood, therefore, must contain a substance that prevents the blood from freezing at the temperature at which water freezes. Ms. Yerky: The blood contains no such substance. Laboratory experiments involving a number of animals, including the arctic squirrel, have shown that a vial of blood from any of the animals freezes at just the same temperature as does a vial of water. 7. Ms. Yerky's response proceeds by A presenting evidence that supports a conclusion inconsistent with Mr. Xu's conclusion B showing that the evidence offered by Mr. Xu was collected by means of unreliable methods C offering an alternative explanation for why the squirrel's blood fails to freeze at the temperature at which water freezes D showing that a key term used by Mr. Xu is ambiguous E showing that the evidence provided by Mr. Xu has no bearing on the point at issue

A No. The introductory claim states it would be a mistake to include it in the first sentence.

B No. Not a reason which is relevant or related to the evidence mentioned.

C No. It plays a conclusion, which needs to be supported by a premise.

D No. slightly an opinion but more considered as a conclusion, which needs to be supported by a premise.

E Yes. The conclusion is related to the argument of not meeting the demand for supply.

https://www.lsatexpert.com/ Please subscribe to my channel, if the video helped you out, so I can continue to make more LSAT Logical Reasoning Videos.

https://www.lsatexpert.com/ Please subscribe to my channel, if the video helped you out, so I can continue to make more LSAT Logical Reasoning Videos. Introduction Vocabularies All Some None Argument Premise Conclusion Intermediate Conclusion Types of question Strength/weakness Flaw Parallel Conclusion Assumption Necessary Assumption Sufficient Assumption Practice from the LSAT PrepTest 94+, the most current Practice Test which was just released. LSAT 94 LR S2 Question: 1-4,7,8,11,13,18,19 LR S4 Q8 (Parallel/Similar) LSAT 94 LR S4 Q19

Final Thought