
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Gustav Mahler’s Symphony No. 1 was first heard on this day in Budapest in 1889, with the 29-year-old composer conducting.
Originally billed as a “symphonic poem,” a newspaper in Budapest even printed a detailed program, obviously supplied by Mahler himself. For subsequent performance in Europe, Mahler quickly withdrew these “Cliff’s Notes” to his Symphony.
Twenty years later, in December of 1909, Mahler conducted its American premiere at Carnegie Hall, during his first season as music director of the New York Philharmonic.
The symphony drew mixed reviews:
The New York Times wrote, “There are matters in it, that as absolute music, have no evident significance, and that serve merely to puzzle and perplex.”
The critic for the Sun took a dislike to the symphony’s finale, suggesting “when the weather is bad in Tyrol, it is beyond the power of language to characterize.”
Mahler’s own reactions are recorded in a letter he sent from New York to Bruno Walter back in Europe: “The day before yesterday I did my Symphony No. 1 here, without getting much reaction. However, I myself was fairly pleased with that youthful effort … The audiences here are very lovable and relatively better mannered than in Vienna. They listen attentively and very sympathetically. The critics are the same as anywhere else. I don’t read any of them.”
Gustav Mahler (1860-1911): Symphony No. 1; Minnesota Orchestra; Edo de Waart, conductor; Virgin 61258
By American Public Media4.7
176176 ratings
Gustav Mahler’s Symphony No. 1 was first heard on this day in Budapest in 1889, with the 29-year-old composer conducting.
Originally billed as a “symphonic poem,” a newspaper in Budapest even printed a detailed program, obviously supplied by Mahler himself. For subsequent performance in Europe, Mahler quickly withdrew these “Cliff’s Notes” to his Symphony.
Twenty years later, in December of 1909, Mahler conducted its American premiere at Carnegie Hall, during his first season as music director of the New York Philharmonic.
The symphony drew mixed reviews:
The New York Times wrote, “There are matters in it, that as absolute music, have no evident significance, and that serve merely to puzzle and perplex.”
The critic for the Sun took a dislike to the symphony’s finale, suggesting “when the weather is bad in Tyrol, it is beyond the power of language to characterize.”
Mahler’s own reactions are recorded in a letter he sent from New York to Bruno Walter back in Europe: “The day before yesterday I did my Symphony No. 1 here, without getting much reaction. However, I myself was fairly pleased with that youthful effort … The audiences here are very lovable and relatively better mannered than in Vienna. They listen attentively and very sympathetically. The critics are the same as anywhere else. I don’t read any of them.”
Gustav Mahler (1860-1911): Symphony No. 1; Minnesota Orchestra; Edo de Waart, conductor; Virgin 61258

6,826 Listeners

38,856 Listeners

8,776 Listeners

9,237 Listeners

5,767 Listeners

934 Listeners

1,388 Listeners

1,289 Listeners

3,150 Listeners

1,973 Listeners

523 Listeners

184 Listeners

13,761 Listeners

3,071 Listeners

247 Listeners

28,099 Listeners

431 Listeners

5,461 Listeners

2,197 Listeners

14,137 Listeners

6,420 Listeners

2,509 Listeners

4,837 Listeners

578 Listeners

239 Listeners