SCOTUScast

Mathena v. Malvo - Post-Argument SCOTUScast


Listen Later

On October 16, 2019, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Mathena v. Malvo, a case which concerns the scope of a new constitutional rule when applied retroactively on collateral review.
In 2004, respondent Lee Boyd Malvo was convicted in Virginia on various counts of capital murder due to his participation in the “DC Sniper” attacks of 2002. As he was 17 years old at the time, he avoided the death penalty and was sentenced to four terms of life imprisonment without parole. In 2012, the Supreme Court held in Miller v. Alabama that sentencing a person younger than 18 to mandatory life imprisonment without parole violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments. In 2016, the Court then held in Montgomery v. Louisiana that Miller had announced a new substantive rule applicable retroactively in cases on state collateral review.
When Malvo raised these issues on collateral review, the Fourth Circuit held that his sentences of life without parole must be vacated based on Miller, and the cases remanded for resentencing to determine whether his crimes reflected a “permanent incorrigibility” that would justify reimposition of the life-without-parole sentence. This judgment created a conflict with the Supreme Court of Virginia, which had concluded that Montgomery did not extend the applicability of Miller to discretionary sentencing schemes (including life without parole), but only applied Miller retroactively to cases on collateral review involving mandatory sentences of life without parole.
The Supreme Court thereafter granted certiorari to address whether the Fourth Circuit erred in concluding that Montgomery--when addressing whether the new constitutional rule announced in Miller applies retroactively on collateral review--may properly be interpreted as modifying and substantively expanding the very rule whose retroactivity was in question.
To discuss the case, we have Kent Scheidegger, Legal Director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

SCOTUScastBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

4.5

106 ratings


More shows like SCOTUScast

View all
WSJ What’s News by The Wall Street Journal

WSJ What’s News

4,326 Listeners

FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

Bloomberg Law by Bloomberg

Bloomberg Law

356 Listeners

FedSoc Forums by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Forums

82 Listeners

The Glenn Show by Glenn Loury

The Glenn Show

2,252 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by Ricochet

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

676 Listeners

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch by Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

2,791 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

678 Listeners

The Editors by National Review

The Editors

4,788 Listeners

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast by The Federalist Society

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

28 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

Uncommon Knowledge by Hoover Institution

Uncommon Knowledge

1,978 Listeners

Strict Scrutiny by Crooked Media

Strict Scrutiny

5,569 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,755 Listeners

The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

The Ezra Klein Show

15,272 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

372 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

666 Listeners

Honestly with Bari Weiss by The Free Press

Honestly with Bari Weiss

8,558 Listeners