And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot;
neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.

( Luke 16:26 )

The earth’s mass has never been measured.

The earth’s mass is calculated by using the radius of the earth, the law of universal gravitation and the field value for acceleration due to gravity. However, this calculation is based on assuming that the earth is solid, or a combination of solid and liquid. So, the assumption that the earth is solid is part of the math that gives us the field value for the acceleration due to gravity, which is used to show that the earth is solid.

Does that sound like circular reasoning to you?

If, as the Bible says, there is empty space in between the surface of hell and the bottom of the lower mantle, what are the implications for the understanding of gravity? If the earth’s mass is less by as much as 26% compared to what we think it is, and yet the field value for acceleration due to gravity is what we measure, then the relationship between mass and gravity is not what science thinks it is.

We are already making considerable progress on developing the idea that gravity is not proportional to mass, but mass is proportional to gravity. Gravity is a created thing that causes the formation of planetary bodies of characteristics that relate to its quantity and frequency.

We have developed a testable hypothesis that will demonstrate the existence of the human soul and hell, based on gravitational waves.

Now we have shown that the assumed relationship between mass and gravity does not exist.

As a result, we do not know the mass of the earth. The number that science has that it uses as the mass of the earth is based on circumstantial evidence, and the assumption that gravity is proportional to mass.