So you've been working with a financial professional for a while, but things just don't "feel right" anymore. Maybe the advisor is inattentive, or maybe you're just not seeing the results you'd hoped for. How do you know when it's okay to overlook some minor issues, and when it's time to leave? Here are 9 reasons why you should consider firing your financial advisor:
Quick but important note: you will see that "my investments are down" is not on this list of reasons to go elsewhere, though it's one of the most common reasons clients seek out new advisors. Investment markets will fluctuate - there is no getting around it. Just because your portfolio, hopefully crafted to meet your long-term investing needs, is down is not a sign that your advisor is doing anything wrong.
If they act like less of a planner and more like a pitch maker.
You know the type: big smile, really expensive pen, armed with glossy pie charts and the new account application still warm from the printer. Being good at selling something is nowhere near the same as being a good client advocate and "coach". True financial planners and advisors will actually take the time to listen to you so that they develop a very clear understanding of your situation and goals. Then and only then, will they provide advice and guidance that fits your specific needs. Beware of anyone who already has a solution in mind without carefully and fully understanding your situation.
If you never hear from them.
In my experience, a financial advisor has to walk a delicate tightrope between contacting his or her clients regularly, but not too regularly. And many times, that's entirely at the whim of the client. So your advisor may not be perfect in this regard, but there's a difference between a busy advisor and a lazy one.
A good financial pro will stay in contact on a regular basis (even if it's only every 6 months or so), to check up on you and make sure your financial situation has not changed significantly.
It is not often that market volatility will force me to make corrections to a client's financial strategy, but unexpected life events can cause us to make serious changes in a plan or investment portfolio. For that reason, it's vital that we stay in regular if not frequent contact.
If they work on commission.
Here's where we differ greatly from much of the financial services industry. We HATE commissions. Commissions are the antithesis of "serving the client's best interests", because the client, whether it's disclosed in a transparent way or not, always gets stuck with the bill. It's also just common sense that a company or product that must offer a very high commission payout must either be making a mint on every sale, or else is something the customer isn't going to see much inherent value in (and will need a "nudge" by salesperson). The whole thing just reeks of conflicted priorities and questionable agendas. (And you might guess, nVest Advisors does not work on commission.)
It's not that there aren't many wonderfully ethical and talented advisors and planners who earn commission on financial products they may use in your plan, but the products themselves can be ridiculously costly, come with hidden fees and charges all over the place, and can create potent conflicts of interest between the advisor and the client. Advisors who earn commission are compensated to MOVE money between products, regardless of how they perform, so they tend to move money around often to generate commissions. I've seen many instances of an advisor selling expensive A-share mutual funds to a client, just to wait 2-3 years and do it again. (I even was expressly "coached" to do that by a mentor early in my career.)
Fee-based compensation means the advisor is paid eithe...