Question: When is a drawing usually not considered necessary for the understanding of an invention under 35 USC 113 (first sentence)? Answer: It has been USPTO practice to treat an application that contains at least one process or method claim as an application for which a drawing is not necessary for an understanding of the […]

The post MPEP Q & A 200: When Drawings Are Not Considered Necessary Under 35 USC 113 appeared first on Patent Education Series.