Question: Give 3 examples of asexually propagated plants. Answer: Asexually propagated plants are those that are reproduced by means other than from seeds, such as by the rooting of cuttings, by layering, budding, grafting, inarching, apomictic seeds, bulbs, division, slips, rhizomes, runners, corms, tissue culture, nucellar embryos, etc. Chapter Details: The answer to this question […]

The post MPEP Q & A 348: Give 3 examples of asexually propagated plants. appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: What rule are design practitioners registered under and what can they practice in? Answer: Design patent practitioners are registered under 37 C.F.R. 11.6(d) and can only practice in design patent matters. In contrast, patent practitioners registered under 37 C.F.R. 11.6(a)-(c) can practice in all patent matters, which includes design patent matters. Chapter Details: The […]

The post MPEP Q & A 347: What rule are design practitioners registered under and what can they practice in? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: When is a Sequence Listing XML required? Answer: When an application filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) having a filing date on or after July 1, 2022, or an application which entered the national stage, having an international filing date on or after July 1, 2022, contains disclosure of nucleotide and/or amino acid sequences, a […]

The post MPEP Q & A 346: When is a Sequence Listing XML required? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: List two types of individuals that affidavits or declarations filed under 37 C.F.R. 1.131 to overcome a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 can be made by. Answer: Affidavits or declarations filed under 37 C.F.R. 1.131 to overcome a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 must be made by either: […]

The post MPEP Q & A 345: List two types of individuals that affidavits filed under 37 C.F.R. 1.131 to overcome a rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 or 103 can be made by. appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: How can an applicant overcome a statutory double patenting rejection? Answer: A terminal disclaimer cannot be filed to obviate a statutory double patenting rejection. A statutory double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the conflicting claims so they are no longer coextensive in scope. A complete response to a statutory double […]

The post MPEP Q & A 344: How can an applicant overcome a statutory double patenting rejection? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: Can any further submission of prior art by the same real party in interest be considered after the filing of the protest? Answer: After the filing of the protest, no further submission of prior art by the same real party in interest will be considered, except for new, non-cumulative prior art submitted requires that a […]

The post MPEP Q & A 343: Can prior art submissions occur after the filing of the patent? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: When has a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection over multiple references been held to be proper when the extra references are cited? Answer: Normally, only one reference should be used in making a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102. However, a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection over multiple references has been held to be proper when the […]

The post MPEP Q & A 342: When is a 35 U.S.C. 102 rejection over multiple references held to be proper? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: What happens when the claim for foreign priority or the certified copy of the foreign application is filed after the date of payment of the issue fee but prior to the date of grant of the patent? Answer: When the claim for foreign priority or the certified copy of the foreign application is filed […]

The post MPEP Q & A 341: Circumstances surrounding claim for foreign priority. appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: What are some non-limiting examples of claims that are not directed to any of the statutory categories? Answer: Non-limiting examples of claims that are not directed to any of the statutory categories include: Products that do not have a physical or tangible form, such as information (often referred to as “data per se”) or […]

The post MPEP Q & A 340: What are non-limiting examples of claims that are not directed to any of the statutory categories? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

Question: When is information material to patentability according to the duty to disclose? Answer: Information is material to patentability when it is not cumulative to information already of record or being made of record in the application, and (1) It establishes, by itself or in combination with other information, a prima facie case of unpatentability of […]

The post MPEP Q & A 339: When is information material to patentability according to the duty to disclose? appeared first on Patent Education Series.