
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Question: Should a dependent claim that does not specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed be rejected under 35 USC 112(d)? Answer: Yes, a dependent claim that does not specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed should be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d). When two claims in an application comply with […]
The post MPEP Q & A 203: Rejections of Dependent Claims Not Specifying a Further Limitation appeared first on Patent Education Series.
By Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #510063.9
1212 ratings
Question: Should a dependent claim that does not specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed be rejected under 35 USC 112(d)? Answer: Yes, a dependent claim that does not specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed should be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d). When two claims in an application comply with […]
The post MPEP Q & A 203: Rejections of Dependent Claims Not Specifying a Further Limitation appeared first on Patent Education Series.

91,117 Listeners

112,351 Listeners

56,419 Listeners

1,853 Listeners