Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

MPEP Q & A 225: What are the reasons why the prior art element should not be considered an equivalent to the invention disclosed in the specification.

Listen Later

Question: What are the reasons why the prior art element should not be considered an equivalent to the invention disclosed in the specification? Answer: Reasons, why the prior art element should not be considered an equivalent to the invention disclosed in the specification, may include: teachings in the specification that the particular prior art is […]

The post MPEP Q & A 225: What are the reasons why the prior art element should not be considered an equivalent to the invention disclosed in the specification. appeared first on Patent Education Series.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store
Patent Bar MPEP Q & A PodcastBy Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006
  • 3.9
  • 3.9
  • 3.9
  • 3.9
  • 3.9

3.9

12 ratings

More shows like Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

View all
6 Minute English by BBC Radio

6 Minute English

1,838 Listeners

Learning English Conversations by BBC Radio

Learning English Conversations

1,067 Listeners

Planet Money by NPR

Planet Money

30,915 Listeners

Learning English Grammar by BBC Radio

Learning English Grammar

314 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

111,352 Listeners