Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Mukherji v. Miller: A New Court Decision Every EB-1A Applicant Should Know
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Mukherji v. Miller: A New Court Decision Every EB-1A Applicant Should Know
In this session, Partner and Attorney Min Kim and Client Services Manager Arianna Gonzalez, MBA broke down a recent federal court decision addressing EB-1 extraordinary ability petitions.
This was the first decision to hold that USCIS impermissibly created and applied the EB-1A two-step, or “final merits,” framework without proper notice and comment. While the ruling did not completely overhaul EB-1 adjudications, it marked an important development and provided a helpful tool for navigating EB-1A filings and challenges.
The session covered what the court actually held, what the decision did (and did not) change, and how it could be used strategically in EB-1 extraordinary ability cases.
Listen In!
View all episodes
By Chugh LLP
5
22 ratings
In this session, Partner and Attorney Min Kim and Client Services Manager Arianna Gonzalez, MBA broke down a recent federal court decision addressing EB-1 extraordinary ability petitions.
This was the first decision to hold that USCIS impermissibly created and applied the EB-1A two-step, or “final merits,” framework without proper notice and comment. While the ruling did not completely overhaul EB-1 adjudications, it marked an important development and provided a helpful tool for navigating EB-1A filings and challenges.
The session covered what the court actually held, what the decision did (and did not) change, and how it could be used strategically in EB-1 extraordinary ability cases.
Listen In!