In this episode I begin with a reflection on Dave's excellent commentary on Episode 71 of the podcast, "Absolute Certainty?" In his commentary, Dave describes the difference between the scientific, logical, rational path towards knowledge and religious assertions which can be defiantly persistent even in the face of overwhelming and innumerable confirmations that the religious model of the cosmos is mistaken. In this episode I reflect again on probability, and as Dave suggests that while we can never have "absolute certainty," in order to further our understanding of the cosmos, we must nevertheless go down the paths of highest probability. I also describe some of why science and religion will always be in conflict since both attempt to explain reality, but do so in entirely different ways, with science relying on evidence and sound reasoning, while religion relies on non-falisifiable, and therefore meaningless assertions and claims to "revelation," "special transcendent knowledge," "divine books," and other such nonsense. I also describe why the "it's just a theory" argument against scientific thinking is weak, incorrect, and disingenuous, and why the mistaken conflation that the "faith" of the scientist is the same as the faith of the religious-minded is flat out false.
---
Send in a voice message: https://anchor.fm/john-cross/message
Support this podcast: https://anchor.fm/john-cross/support