
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Somewhere along the line, “hard work” stopped being about contribution and became a moral cover for greed. Billionaires hoard, workers struggle, and politicians quote Scripture to justify cruelty. It’s time to challenge the myth that wealth equals virtue and remember that fairness, empathy, and integrity (not blind productivity) are what make work meaningful!
You’ve probably heard the phrase, “If you don’t work, you don’t eat.”
It’s a verse pulled from the Bible (2 Thessalonians 3:10) and it’s been used for centuries to moralize about poverty. But in modern America, that line has become more than just Scripture; it’s practically an economic doctrine. Somewhere along the line, it got twisted into the idea that wealth equals virtue, and that if you’re struggling, it’s your own damn fault.
The idea started as a theological concept. Early Protestant reformers like Martin Luther and John Calvin emphasized hard work, discipline, and frugality as signs of good moral character. Work wasn’t just how you survived, it was how you proved your righteousness. Centuries later, that evolved into what sociologist Max Weber famously called “the Protestant Work Ethic.”
So, in this episode of afterthoughts, let’s explore how that mindset and the Protestant Work Ethic became the moral “cover story” for greed.
CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
We spend so much time fearing the future — waiting for collapse, punishment, or salvation — that we forget the power we hold in the present. These readings remind us that “the end” isn’t something to dread; it’s a call to act now. Justice, compassion, and truth only exist when we bring them to life… today!
Have you ever noticed how often people talk about “the end of the world” as if it’s just around the corner? From ancient prophets to modern politicians, predicting catastrophe seems to be one of humanity’s favorite pastimes. But obsession with the future — with judgment, destruction, or even salvation — often blinds us to the very real challenges and opportunities that exist right now.
Welcome to Mythologizing the Bible, where we’ll be taking a look at three readings from the Christian Bible through the lens of “sacred myth.”
As we reflect on the readings for the 33rd Sunday in Ordinary Time, we’ll explore why focusing on today matters more than fixating on tomorrow, and how justice, contribution, and presence can help us build a better world (without waiting for divine intervention to save us).
In this episode, we’re asking a simple but powerful question: What happens when we stop obsessing about what’s coming next and start doing the hard, necessary work of justice right now? Because maybe the “end of the world” isn’t something that happens to us. Maybe it’s something we prevent, one act of integrity at a time.
Thanks for reading CODA Project! This post is public so feel free to share it.
You’ve probably noticed it — the louder someone is, the more certain they sound, and (unfortunately) the more people tend to believe them. Whether it’s on cable news, TikTok, or behind a pulpit, confidence gets mistaken for credibility all the time. And the truth is, that’s not a new problem. It’s one of the oldest human habits: confusing volume for value, certainty for wisdom, and charisma for truth!
Today, we’re going to talk about why we fall for confident voices — even when they’re wrong — and how we can retrain ourselves to think more critically, stay curious, and build confidence that’s grounded in integrity rather than ego.
Because the issue isn’t just that loud people mislead others. The real danger is that thoughtful, empathetic people stop speaking up; they start doubting themselves, thinking, “Well, maybe they ARE right… they sound so sure.”
SO… if you’re ready, let’s dive into this week’s episode of Afterthoughts and see if we can fix some of that!
CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
It’s easy to follow the loudest voices, especially when they sound confident. But confidence without truth is dangerous. This week, we’re exploring how faith, politics, and misinformation collide… and how real courage means questioning what we hear, defending what’s true, and speaking out with calm conviction when silence would be easier.
Have you ever noticed how easy it is for people to mistake confidence for truth? The loudest voices in our world—whether political, religious, or online—often sound so sure of themselves that we stop questioning what they’re saying. And yet, that’s exactly when we should be asking the hardest questions.
Welcome to Mythologizing the Bible, where we’ll be taking a look at three readings from the Christian Bible through the lens of “sacred myth.”
As we reflect on the readings for the 32nd Sunday in Ordinary Time, Cycle C, we’ll explore how faith and belief can either inspire thoughtful courage or become a shield for bad ideas and how silence, in the face of false certainty, allows harmful ideologies to take root.
In this episode, we’re asking an honest question: What does it mean to live with integrity in an age of misinformation? Because real faith, whether religious or secular, isn’t about believing harder; it’s about thinking deeper, questioning more honestly, and speaking up with confidence that’s grounded in truth.
CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
If you’ve ever looked around at the world and thought, “How did we get so bad at working together?” — you’re not alone. It’s strange, isn’t it? Cooperation is the very thing that made us human. It is our oldest survival skill, our secret superpower. Yet somewhere along the way, we traded that in for hierarchy, control, and competition.
In this bonus edition of Afterthoughts, we’re going to talk about how power hijacked human progress, how systems built to organize us ended up dividing us, and how we can reclaim cooperation as both a moral value and a practical tool for survival.
Because let’s be honest: no one person, party, or ideology can fix the mess we’re in. The only way forward — the only way — is together.
So, if you’re ready, let’s dive into another bonus episode of Afterthoughts!
CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
You’ve probably heard the phrase “seeing the world through rose-colored glasses.” It’s a nice metaphor for optimism… until you realize it applies to everything we believe. Because none of us, not one, sees the world as it actually is. We see it through filters—lenses shaped by our upbringing, culture, fears, hopes, and, yes… our faith.
This bonus episode of Afterthoughts is one that I’ve put together for all of those people who still cling to their religious beliefs. I’m not trying to be judgmental, I simply hope to help them actively engage with the faith they claim to hold.
You see, the problem is that when a belief system becomes our main or only filter, we stop seeing the world as it is and start seeing it only as we’ve been told it is. And that’s where things can go terribly wrong; not just in religion, but in politics, media, and daily life.
In this episode, we’re going to talk about what happens when faith becomes a filter, how belief systems shape our perception of reality, and how we can use three foundational human values — integrity, curiosity, and fairness — to see more clearly.
So, if you’re ready, let’s dive into this bonus episode of Afterthoughts!
CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Have you ever noticed how rejection doesn’t just sting emotionally, it actually hurts? Like, physically hurts? It turns out that’s not just a metaphor. When you’re excluded, ghosted, or pushed out of a group, your brain reacts the same way it does when you touch a hot stove. It lights up the same pain centers. So yeah, being left out literally physically hurts!
Humans are pack animals. Always have been. Long before we built cities or wrote scriptures, our ancestors learned that survival wasn’t about being the biggest or strongest — it was about cooperation. Sharing food, caring for the injured, raising children together; those were the traits that gave us the evolutionary edge.
But here’s the twist: evolution didn’t just reward cooperation; it punished isolation. Being cast out of the tribe wasn’t symbolic, it was a death sentence. So, the brain evolved to treat exclusion as an existential threat. That’s why rejection feels like pain. That’s why loneliness can make your heart race and your stomach twist. And that’s why social disconnection has become one of the greatest health risks in the modern world.
CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Inclusion isn’t easy—it’s work. But if we want to protect both people and planet, we have to choose cooperation over control, compassion over comfort, and curiosity over fear. This week’s reflections remind us that living our values isn’t about being right, it’s about being real, even when it’s uncomfortable!
Have you ever noticed how often people talk about love, faith, and community, but then draw the line when it means actually including someone different from themselves? It’s easy to preach compassion, but a lot harder to practice it when the person across from you challenges your comfort zone.
Welcome to Mythologizing the Bible, where we’ll be taking a look at three readings from the Christian Bible through the lens of “sacred myth.”
As we reflect on the readings for the 31st Sunday in Ordinary Time, Cycle C, we’ll explore how living our values—honestly, courageously, and cooperatively—requires us to bridge differences rather than build walls.
In this episode, we’re asking an honest question: What if inclusion, not ideology, is what truly defines our humanity? Because protecting each other and the world we share starts with the difficult, daily work of understanding one another, especially when it’s uncomfortable.
CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
If your theology needs a wall to feel safe, it’s not protecting faith, it’s protecting fear. That’s our starting point. And yes, I know: walls feel simple, like buying the heavy-duty lock for your front door and calling it a security strategy. But we’re grown-ups; we can hold two ideas at once: we all want safety, and we also know fear shrinks our circle of care until there’s hardly anyone left inside—sometimes not even us.
Here’s the thesis in plain language: closed-borders thinking is un-Christian and un-humanist because it shrinks the circle of care. It turns people into categories and it turns mercy into membership. The practical alternative is a people-first policy. Not slogans, not vibes. A people-first policy means starting from a place of respect and dignity (humane processing, families kept together, language access). It includes due process (decisions driven by evidence, not profiling) and shared prosperity (legal pathways and fair labor rules so that work lifts communities instead of exploiting them). That’s morality you can measure.
As for the tone of our conversation in the episode: I’ve tried to be direct, kind, and myth-busting. I trade social media memes for facts. And I trade fear for steps that actually work at the legal and policy level.
You don’t have to agree with me on every point; I’m asking you to keep your values visible while we look at the real world together. Because people aren’t problems to be managed; they’re neighbors to be included under the same laws and protections. If your faith tradition says “welcome the stranger,” we’ll talk about how that looks Monday at 10 a.m., not just Sunday at 10 a.m. If you’re a secular humanist, we’ll ground it in dignity, fairness, and outcomes that reduce harm.
Will you give me 30 minutes of your time? It’s worth it.
CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Who’s in? Who’s out? These readings from the Bible say, “Stop gatekeeping and start caring.” In other words, people first, identity tests never. But don’t forget to thank the real helpers who make care possible. We must widen care across borders, resist gatekeeping zeal, and aim gratitude at the people who actually heal!
Have you noticed how often debates about faith and politics become debates about worthiness? Who’s “in,” who’s “out,” and who gets to control the gate? These old stories are trying to nudge us away from border-check religion and toward something simpler: people first, purity or identity tests never!
Welcome to Mythologizing the Bible, where we’ll be taking a look at three readings from the Christian Bible through the lens of “sacred myth.”
As we reflect on the readings for the 28th Sunday in Ordinary Time, Cycle C, we’ll explore why help shouldn’t depend on identity, how zeal can slide into gatekeeping, and why gratitude belongs with the real helpers and the systems that make help easy to reach.
What happens if we focus on widening the circle of care, removing the barriers to access, and measuring our faith (or our ethics) by how quickly and fairly people can get care? Because if belief is going to mean anything, it should look like open doors and neighbors protected.
CODA Project is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
From the publisher's feed