National Polygamy Advocate

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares Part 5 of "Corrections" to the movie from 1956, titled, "The Ten Commandments." Summarizing the corrections shared in the previous 4 episodes of this podcast, Mark Henkel shares (in this Episode #320) the connections of these corrections to the start of the Christian Polygamy movement on July 4, 1994, which made it possible for the overall larger movement of UCAP, Unrelated Consenting Adult Polygamy.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares Part 4 of "Corrections" to the 1956 movie, "The Ten Commandments." Adding yet more to the previous 3 episodes' "corrections," this Episode #319 reveals how Zipporah (mis-named as "Zephra") from the tribe of Midian did not descend from Ishmael (born unto Abraham of Hagar the handmaid of Sarah), but rather of Abraham's third wife, Keturah. While the movie failed to recognize this, the Bible shows that Abraham was a polygamist with three wives, the third of whom bore Midian.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares Part 3 of "Corrections" to movie, "The Ten Commandments" (1956). Building upon the previous 2 episodes' "corrections," this Episode #318 reveals how, not only was Moses' first wife not named "Zephra," but Moses actually married at least one more wife. That movie did not show that Moses was actually a polygamist, according to the Bible.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares Part 2 of "Corrections" to the 1956 movie, "The Ten Commandments." Adding to the previous episode's "correction," this Episode #317 reveals how the movie itself self-admits why we must remember "The Ten Commandments" Movie is NOT an accurately actual account of the Biblical story.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares Part 1 of "Corrections" to the 1956 movie, "The Ten Commandments." Christians and others watch that TV movie each year on Resurrection Sunday (aka "Easter"), even though the topic of the movie is actually NOT about the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Mark Henkel had watched this movie back on April 3, 1994, and recently again on March 31, 2024. This podcast Episode #316 was released on April 3, 2024 - exactly 30 years after he had watched the movie back on April 3, 1994. Starting this multi-part mini-series, Mark Henkel also teases that these corrections do specifically connect to the movement of Christian Polygamy which led to the overall movement of UCAP, Unrelated Consenting Adult Polygamy.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel begins the coming 7th year of weekly episodes of this podcast. Since the actual 6th Year Anniversary of March 21, 2024, this episode formally begins this next year of episodes. Mark Henkel shares some sincerely personal information, references some of the ongoing subtopics that will continue, and invites listeners to share ideas that could be addressed in future episodes of this podcast.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel personally celebrates the milestone of 6 years of weekly episodes of this podcast. The podcast’s first episode premiered on March 21, 2018. Mark Henkel also celebrates the new 1 year anniversary since the podcast transformed from archiving his numerous past media interviews into being directly-spoken tools for history, teaching, lessons-learned, personal details, and more.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares the 4th of the 6 Questions that the Supreme Court of the United States addressed in (this Part 5 of this multi-part mini-series regarding) Reynolds v. United States Decision of 1878. That "Question 4" to be determined by the Supreme Court in the case, asked, "4. Was the testimony of Amelia Jane Schofield, given at a former trial for the same offence, but under another indictment, improperly admitted in evidence?” This is the episode that asks all listeners to "Imagine a world where your wife or husband -against their will- could be compelled to testify against YOU for marrying YOU!"

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares the RECAP of Questions #1, #2, and #3 of the 6 Questions that the Supreme Court of the United States addressed in (this RECAP 123 of this multi-part mini-series regarding) Reynolds v. United States Decision of 1878. By having this consolidated understanding of the first half of the 6 Questions, listeners will be hereby more prepared to contemplate the next 3 Questions to be shared in future coming podcast episodes.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠

National Polygamy Advocate ™ Mark Henkel shares the 3nd of the 6 Questions that the Supreme Court of the United States addressed in (this Part 4 of this multi-part mini-series regarding) Reynolds v. United States Decision of 1878. That "Question 3" to be determined by the Supreme Court in the case, asked, “3. Were the challenges of certain other jurors by the government improperly sustained?” Chief Justice Waite's response continued yet again with the same clever nuanced word-game, applying a double-standard in hypocrisy that revealed the Court's bias.

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠http://www.NationalPolygamyAdvocate.com⁠⁠⁠⁠