I will finish talking about the article I finished off with in the last episode. I do think that unless something changes, Americans are headed for: some type of large-scale armed conflict between disgruntled citizens and U.S. government enforcers, a civil war between left/ right political supporters or a combination of the two formerly mentioned scenarios. It is nice to see Americans desiring to use firearms to fight for freedom; however, most of these firearms owners are political supporters that are being manipulated by television propaganda. Wars should be fought by men of wisdom who know exactly who they are fighting and why they are fighting. Men who fight in wars should be led by their conscience. Their conscience should be guided by an understanding of objective universal morality. Sadly, the men who will fight in this potential war will be guided by despots promulgating divisive public relations propaganda. Just like the "Bishop" character in the movie Juice who had the right idea when he decided he wanted to stand up to the bullies in his neighborhood and stop running from them. Unfortunately, the "Bishop" character was mesmerized by television movie propaganda as well as the common inner-city "now I am the man" street mentality. Next, I will read from an article about third party candidates for the next presidential election (selection). My "inside the box" strategy of trying to get people who can't let go of politics to look to a third party is not about any politician. The underlying idea is about changing what we value and aligning our behaviors with our new values that resemble more objective morals. It would be nice to see most voters support a third party thereby beginning to change their values. Perhaps this could influence people who do not vote but still think what we call government is a legitimate construct. I think that if something like this were to happen, humans may have a chance to survive into the future. I think this because as people begin to become more moral (objectively) by aligning their new values with their behaviors, our society will become freer. This will spread out to the entire world. Morality and freedom are synonymous. Possibly, if the human race was to be able to slow down the elite classes' race to total tyranny, independent researchers may get more time to get more information out to people. Also, it is possible that the censorship may lessen in public media as well. It is also possible the elite class may panic and make some extremely insane and dangerous moves. Unless we try how will we ever know?

Most people in America do not want to face the fact that the police in the United States are identical IN THEORY to the enforcers of Nazi Germany. I am NOT saying that the American police are committing the same atrocities in the same manner as the enforcers of Nazi Germany. Not yet! I am saying that IN THEORY blind obedience to authorities and order following are the same no matter what leader is giving the commands. As long as American police continue to enforce rules called laws, mandates and executive orders without completely knowing what they are participating in as well as being able to judge whether their (the police) behaviors are initiating harm to others, what happened in Nazi Germany can happen in the U.S. I have mentioned in the past what is happening in New York. The ruler of New York is trying to use imagined powers, in conjunction with the N.Y. Department of "Health", which is controlled by the N.Y. governor, to declare anyone a health threat and detain them without any evidence of any immoral wrongdoing or presence of disease (if that should even matter). The ruler of N.Y. plans to use the police to enforce this tyranny. Imagine you are home eating dinner and the police show up at your door. The police tell you that they are taking you to a "quarantine camp" for an indefinite period of time. Are you starting to get it! This is a clear hypothetical example of how American police can become as evil as the Nazis. The New York ruler's attempts at this tyranny have failed so far; however, the ruler is appealing a current case denying the executive branch these imagined powers. As I have mentioned in the past, the police unions and upper command in New Jersey and other states have refused to aggressively enforce the "health" measures. This is encouraging; however, we still have a serious problem. All that it takes is the right situation with the right propaganda and the majority of police will enforce immoral dictates. Why? Because the job of police is to enforce the rules that politicians create. Look at what happened during the Milgram Experiments and keep in mind that the subjects in the experiment were not getting paid. The public has to start holding the police accountable for enforcing rules that do not violate objective natural rights (at minimum). In this episode, I will talk about: police enforcing driver's license suspensions for so - called offenses that are not directly related to specific driving offenses that could be dangerous or harmful to others (drug rules called laws, not paying tolls, not paying parking tickets). I will also discuss: autism, an article discussing the results of a poll taken about how people feel about the current state of the U.S. government, the divide and conquer strategy of the political left/right divide, and the religion of politics.

Check out the audio prediction by Paul Harvey, a former ABC News broadcaster. It's a good bet that he had some inside knowledge. I think he left broadcasting in the early 2000's. In this episode, I will begin by clarifying a tangent that I was talking about concerning the illusory existence of the state and the collective as living entities with rights of their own. All rights start in the individual. I will also talk about a United Nation's article from 2008 that was recently removed from the U.N. website. This article was referring to world hunger as "beneficial." What is the deal with this article? For those who have been studying what is really going on in this hellworld, this article should not be a surprise. I will also talk about the World Economic Forum. The WEF just finalized what looks like a partnership deal with the U.N. One of their (WEF, U.N.) goals is to expedite Agenda 2030. After some ranting, I will continue to talk about autism. In the last episode, I focused on the seclusion rooms and the violence conducted by many of these children. I will discuss this violence further. I will also talk about the normalization of autism. It seems that the majority of society just wants to accept autism and not look to find the causes or try to reverse autism in kids. Many parents do not want to help their autistic kids at all. In the next episode, I will finalize my points on autism and move on from this topic for the time being. As a society becomes more immoral that society will become more violent, chaotic and enslaved.

In this episode I will read from an article which describes the behaviors of mainly autistic children and the reactions to those behaviors by schools in New Jersey, USA. The laws of cause and effect show how immorality is synonymous with violence, chaos and slavery. As a society becomes more immoral that society will become more enslaved. Americans accept autism as a fact of life and are not interested in trying to discover the true causes of autism. Some symptoms of this apathy and ignorance are the mistreatment of children and violent behavior in children. This problem will only be solved when Americans muster the courage to face the harsh truth that autism has a cause, and we are all to blame. Most Americans are too afraid to take an honest look into the effects that vaccines have on children. Additionally, people do not want to accept that the foods we feed our children and ourselves are full of toxins, pharmaceutical byproducts and lack nutrition. The water we drink and use to cook with and bathe in is toxic. Our skies are polluted with bioavailable particulates that we are all breathing in. Our whole planet is a garbage dump, and the effects are becoming hard to ignore even for people who want to be willfully ignorant.

In this episode I will discuss: doing the great work while also being employed full time in a restaurant, I am going to scale down my podcasts, I still want to do the interview with a child care worker, some people that I work with (cooks) at the restaurant call me a vegan and I am not a vegan (I am not even a vegetarian [almost a vegetarian]), any cook or chef who does not know what vegans and vegetarians eat is not a real chef, I am getting burned out, I am sick of the willful ignorance - apathy and public acquiescence to tyranny in the world, the Uvalde, Texas police allowed a murderer to murder at will and they assaulted the parents that wanted to try to stop the killer, voluntary, left/right paradigm of U.S. politics, the left wants to get rid of guns in the populace while keeping guns in the hands of police of whom the left wants to defund, the right supports the 2nd Amendment while supporting the police and military, violence begets violence, insanity.    

In this episode I will discuss: legitimized violence, Stockholm Syndrome, underlying principles and concepts of justice, the meaning of voluntary, Initiation vs Initiation, immoral behaviors outweigh moral behaviors, inversions of moral equations, inversions of principles, the left/right paradigm of politics, walking multiple tightropes, harm reduction and having the courage to walk away from systems of legitimized coercion and violence. As pessimistic as I am about the prospects of human survival into the near future, I do think that if the masses were to begin to wise up, we have a chance at salvaging something. I think we have a chance to maintain some levels of survival. However, the key is for people to know and understand the seriousness of our human situation. If this happens, people may be able to psychologically handle the struggles coming in the near future. The ruling class hates the fact that natural behavioral laws of objective morality exist. The ruling class has been able to trick the populace into thinking that these laws do not exist via public relations propaganda. After decades of this propaganda, many people have developed a similar hatred for the principles of objective morality. These people have been tricked into hating the principles of objective morality because the haters want to adhere to their subjective/programmed worldviews. No matter what solutions humans try to implement for the problems in our world, humans must begin to know, understand and align with objective universal morals in order to get freedom and maintain the life support systems necessary for survival.  

Sorry for the typo in the beginning of the episode in the video version. I really thought the spinning star was a cool effect. The information should read, "The Department of Homeland Security has a new program to make sure we all get truthful information." Even that statement may not be completely grammatically correct. In the video, the (the) between (all) and (get) is an error. I thought it was the other way around which is still not optimum but acceptable. I do not feel like correcting the error. I am trying to get this knowledge out to people with less available time because I am working over 40 hours in a restaurant washing dishes. I am not always at my best when doing this work. In this episode I will talk about current problems with the so - called justice systems that we have today. The core foundation of any justice system should be objective universal morality. This is definitely not the case. Subjective morals are ubiquitous across America and the entire world. There is nothing wrong with having societal rules that conform to particular customs and societal cultures. However, all customs and societal cultures must be rooted in objective universal morality in order to maintain human freedom. Justice should be served in a localized fashion by the people living in the particular community where a crime has occurred. All participation must be voluntary without any coercion via threats of violence and duress. This is possible. However, at the current time, I do not think living in a large society that understands that morality is objective is probable. This is why I am offering the solution of walking the tightrope. This harm - reduction style approach can help people to use a cost - benefit analysis which weighs people's fears, concerns for safety, desires to make logical sense with the beginnings of having the courage to align with objective morals. Yeah right, good luck with that. I am still going to try because I know there are some of you out there that are sick and tired of the bullshit that is going on in our societies.

This is another video/audio podcast. I am going to read from two articles that I submitted to a local newspaper. One of the articles was published. I wrote an article explaining the non - aggression principle and how natural behavioral laws work. The other article I wrote was a response to a feedback article published in the newspaper. My response article was not published. I will also read from the feedback article. I will then discuss the hatred of free will. Many people hate that other people have free will; many of these same people hate their own free will. Many people are not even conscious of how self - loathing they are. Freedom is free will. Humans have the ability to make free will choices. We are all free. Humans are free to make the choices to live in a free society or an enslaved society. Humans have the freedom to be free or enslaved. Most people choose the latter. The individual who responded to my article on natural behavioral laws hates freedom. There are tens of millions and more people in America who have similar views to this individual. These people are the resistance to freedom. This is the resistance to beginning a process of trying to maintain a freer society with less immorality. People who feel the same as the author of the feedback article are not interested in beginning to consider walking the tightrope between right and wrong.

In this episode I will present a specific harm - reduction based solution that I refer to as: Walking the Tightrope. There will be some charts at the end for those who can see the video version. For those who cannot, the charts are mostly the same with the exception of the arrow position. This is a further elaboration of the solutions podcast episodes in this series and the solutions articles on my website willhoey.com. Once again, I am trying to work inside the box of the public's belief in human rulership. People tend to confuse the need for humans to administer punishment for crimes with the perceived need for a master class of humans to rule over the masses. People mistakenly think that society needs humans to create subjective rules for the masses to abide by and enforce. What the public does not understand is that there are objective natural behavioral laws that are in effect whether humans adhere to these laws or not. Humans are required to know, understand and align with these laws. Punishment should not be administered by enforcement. Self - defense is the proper way to punish people. This is just the beginning of understanding natural laws. We can walk the tightrope between right and wrong. When we are wrong, we can correct it. This is a learning process that requires responsibility. The populace must understand that everyone has to be involved in maintaining a free society. 

In this episode I will discuss: the obvious changing of narratives in the mainstream media, independent reports of potential U.S. government use of tax dollars to fund vaccine marketing, self - defense principle, theme 1 of SDP is to create freedom and peace and reduce violence, SD is not violence, definition of violence, when people start to understand SDP they will be able to correctly assess the difference between violence and righteous physical force, comparison between a police officer stealing a car and a car - jacker stealing a car, most people do not think they have the right to flee from law enforcement, I will try to flee from an altercation before I fight, I do not want war, we can have people in society that perform police duties, theme 2 of SDP is - if we are going to have police we must have freedom as well, a society can have both police (if you want to call them that) and freedom, freedom comes from the majority of a populace aligning behaviors with NAP and SDP, freedom and peace are not inherently synonymous, America appears to be a peaceful society, this peace is the result of duress, no police does not equal no rules, ideas for upcoming episodes.