Sylvester, O. and Clark, A. (2025) ‘Pura vida for who? Slow violence against Indigenous land defenders in Costa Rica’, Local Environment, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2025.2596712.
Abstract: Land defense research has largely focused on direct violence – visible, immediate acts of aggression – while neglecting slow violence, an insidious form of harm that is gradual, cumulative, and often invisible. In Costa Rica, Indigenous land defenders have faced threats and assassinations, yet global narratives often overlook Costa Rica, in part because slow violence is hard to track and quantify and this violence is often overshadowed by the widespread promotion of the country’s support for human rights. This study examines slow violence against Indigenous land defenders in Costa Rica, arguing that it is both a distinct form of violence and a condition that increases vulnerability to direct attacks. Using qualitative methods, including document analysis and interviews with Indigenous land defenders, we examined how state inaction and structural racism perpetuate harm. Our findings show that only parts of Indigenous territories are officially recognised, and even those face ongoing settler occupation unaddressed by the state. Despite clear national laws and international obligations, the Costa Rican state has failed to protect Indigenous rights to autonomous governance, has ignored contamination and extraction on their lands, and has established biodiversity protection areas on stolen land. We argue that this slow violence sustains the myth of Costa Rican exceptionalism, masking the real threats faced by Indigenous defenders and undermining efforts to safeguard their rights. These findings can be used to confront the underlying systemic racism that perpetuates violent colonial legacies, facilitates direct violence, and limits Indigenous rights and autonomy.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit necropolitics.substack.com