Andrea Lavazza joins host Katherine Bassil in discussion on the ethical implications of cerebral or brain organoids, a technology that has been developing with high speed ever since its conception. In the first part of this episode, Andrea elaborates on the thought experiment of the philosopher Hilary Putnam on "brains in a vat" and explains why brain organoids carry ethical implications, stressing on what is hope and what is hype. In the second part, we discuss in detail the implications of a recent study where brain function was restored after death. Finally, Andrea sheds light on the importance of focusing on current issues including privacy and commercialization. Are human brain organoids conscious? Will brain organoids aid in the redefinition of life and death? What does the public think of using brain organoids for research? What is the role of scientists, ethicists, journalists and the public in guiding developments in this field? Find out more details on episode 10 of the Neuroethics Police podcast!

In this episode:

Marcello Ienca joins host Katherine Bassil in discussion on the implementation of new “neuro” human rights with newly emerging neurotechnologies. In the first part of this episode, Marcello explains why our societies are in need of new human rights in a day where we are witnessing a neurotechnology revolution. In the second part, we discuss in detail the implications of emerging neurotechnologies and why it is important to protect the consumer against misuse. Finally we shed light on Marcello’s opinion on a group that has already taken action based on his suggestions for new human rights, by formulating a petition to congress. Are emerging neurotechnologies threatening our human rights? Are we moving towards a neurotech-anxious society? Will neurotechnologies create inequalities within society? Why are the new human rights needed to protect us from emerging neurotechnologies? Find out more details on episode 9 of the Neuroethics Police podcast! 

In this episode: 

Saskia Valk joins host Katherine Bassil in discussion on science communication through ART. In the first part of this episode, Saskia takes us into her world of interdisciplinary art, where she works along with philosophers, scientists and other stakeholders in training upcoming artists to bridge the fields of science, technology and other societal issues. In the second part, we discuss the involvement and importance of artists in communicating science and its practices with a wider non-expert yet implicated audience. Can Art translate science to the wider public? Can Art bridge the worlds of scientists with the general public? Does Art carry a responsibility to communicate science? Find out more details on episode 8 of the Neuroethics Police podcast!

In this episode:

Prof. dr. David Roef & Dr. Antonia Waltermann join host Katherine Bassil in discussion on neurolaw. In the first part of this episode, we discuss the involvement of neuroscience in the courtroom. In the second part, we delve into philosophical concepts such as free-will and neuroscience. Finally, we discuss how neuroscientific findings can be used to reshape current policies, focusing on criminal cases of juveniles. Can Neuroscience be misused in the courtroom? Did Neuroscience Destroy Free Will? Can Neuroscience influence Criminal Policies? Find out more details on episode 7 of the Neuroethics Police podcast!

In this episode:

Neuroscience PhD candidates Clara Snijders, Jackson Boonstra, Megan Sieg and Masters student Ieva Gembutaite joined the Neuroethics Police in an open discussion. In this episode, several ethical and societal implications were discussed concerning  recent neuroscience research, including keeping pig brains "alive", human brain organoids, brain-computer interfaces (or BCI), artificial intelligence (or AI) and last but not least human head transplants. During this open discussion the ethical and societal implications of similar research were raised with more questions asked than answered. What neuroscience research keeps you awake at night?

Assistant Professor Dorothee Horstkötter discusses the neuroethics of forensic psychology and psychiatry focusing on her previous experience with juvenile delinquents in the Netherlands. With a background in practical philosophy and applied bioethics, Dr. Dorothee highlights the problematic implications of forensic psychology and psychiatry. She also provides a critical perspective on introducing artificial intelligence in the courtroom. 

Curious but not ready to commit? This is a short sneak peek into the Neuroethics Police.

Associate Professor Daniël van den Hove discusses the neuroethics of biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease and Depression, accompanied by a short trip into the future.

Why Neuroethics Today? Who is the host? Learn more about the motive behind this podcast, and what to expect.