
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Welcome to Season 15, Episode 9 of Notes to My Legal Self, the legal operations podcast on turning legal work into measurable results.Russ Jacobs, who leads the intellectual property and innovation group at Starbucks Coffee Company, joins host Olga V. Mack to explain how data, metrics, and continuous improvement make a legal team a better business partner. He walks through a real IP clearance case study, his approach to stakeholder alignment in large and small organizations, and how he uses AI to analyze legal data.In this episode, you'll learn:- How to measure legal team performance with data- How to run continuous improvement in a legal department- How to build psychological safety on a legal team- How AI can support legal data analysisTimestamps:00:00 Introduction01:45 Meet Russ Jacobs02:15 Career path from litigation to in-house IP04:00 Leading legal at a national child welfare association08:00 Rethinking a mature trademark portfolio10:00 Looking beyond trademarks to other IP tools13:00 Start with governance documents and frameworks14:00 Open source and Starbucks farmer support centers18:00 How to define your goals before changing process19:30 Start with the data you already have22:15 Getting buy-in from VPs and executives26:45 Measuring IP clearance: speed versus risk29:30 Lessons from supporting new nonprofit programs31:30 Team goals, thresholds, and safe experimentation36:00 Buying technology after understanding the problem39:30 Final takeaway: work backward from your impact story.Russ's advice: Pick one to three simple data points that show leadership the impact your team has.How does your team talk about mistakes and what it learned from them? Share your answer in the comments.Follow this in-house counsel podcast and rate it so more legal teams can find these conversations.Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be? Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage.Like, comment, and subscribe to @NotesToMyLegalSelf so you never miss an episode.Explore more episodes at https://www.notestomylegalself.comINTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®#NotesToMyLegalSelf #LegalOps #LegalLeadership #IntellectualProperty
Welcome to Season 15, Episode 8 of Notes to My Legal Self, the in-house counsel podcast for lawyers navigating legal communication, leadership, AI, and the future of legal work.
Matthew Lowe joins host Olga V. Mack for “Lost in Translation: Why Great Lawyers Explain, Not Impress” to explore how lawyers can turn complex legal knowledge into clear, practical advice that helps businesses make better decisions.
Drawing on his experience in in-house legal practice, technology, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance, Matthew explains why great lawyers do more than demonstrate expertise. They listen, understand their audience, ask the right questions, and communicate advice people can act on.
In this episode, you'll learn:
Why legal advice should be a conversation, not a one-way instruction
How to explain complex legal issues without relying on legalese
Why complexity doesn't always equal business value
What lawyers should understand about a business before advising it
How to communicate uncertainty and confidence levels
How to evaluate AI-generated answers, prompts, facts, and assumptions
Why critical thinking and meaningful review remain essential in the age of AI
How clear communication builds trust with business stakeholders
Timestamps:
(00:00) Introduction
(01:37) Matthew Lowe's career journey
(05:00) Law, technology, and in-house practice
(07:00) Why legal advice gets lost in translation
(09:00) Making legal advice accessible
(12:00) Complexity versus business value
(13:00) Collaboration and stakeholder context
(15:00) Communicating with different audiences
(19:00) Making legal advice actionable
(22:00) Confirming facts and understanding the real question
(23:00) Understanding the business before advising
(27:00) Communicating confidence and uncertainty
(30:00) Simplifying technical information
(31:00) ChatGPT, prompts, and context
(33:00) Curiosity, humility, and asking questions
(35:00) Human skills in the age of AI
(37:00) AI hallucinations and critical thinking
(38:00) Building analytical skills before delegating to AI
(40:00) Why meaningful review matters
(41:00) Matthew's key advice
(43:00) Final reflections
Matthew's key takeaway:
Share your thoughts in the comments.
Enjoy this legal leadership podcast and podcast for lawyers? Rate and review Notes to My Legal Self on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.
Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be? Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage.
Like, comment, and subscribe to @NotesToMyLegalSelf for more conversations with in-house counsel and legal professionals.
Explore more episodes: https://www.notestomylegalself.com
INTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®
#NotesToMyLegalSelf #InHouseCounsel #PodcastForLawyers #GeneralCounsel #LegalLeadership #LegalCommunication #LegalTech #ArtificialIntelligence #FutureOfLaw
Welcome to Season 15, Episode 7 of Notes to My Legal Self, the in-house counsel podcast for lawyers navigating AI, legal technology, leadership, and the future of legal work.
Whitney Stefko joins host Olga V. Mack to explore one of the biggest challenges facing legal departments today: how to turn AI experimentation and technological innovation into meaningful, lasting organizational change.
Working at the intersection of law, AI, and organizational transformation, Whitney shares why successful legal transformation starts with people, not technology. From responsible AI adoption to influencing stakeholders without formal authority, this conversation offers practical insights for in-house counsel, legal operations professionals, general counsel, and legal leaders navigating the changing legal landscape.
In this episode, you'll learn:
Why technology alone isn't enough to drive successful legal transformation
How to move from AI experimentation to responsible, meaningful adoption
Why understanding real workflows is essential to implementing legal technology
How psychological safety helps legal teams adapt to change
Why AI fluency doesn't necessarily mean competence or accuracy
How to influence stakeholders without formal authority
Why understanding people's incentives can improve collaboration
How legal operations leaders can bridge the gap between legal, technology, and business teams
Why in-house counsel should build relationships with business partners before legal issues arise
How to identify practical opportunities to improve repetitive legal workflows
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction to Notes to My Legal Self
00:43 Whitney Stefko on law, AI, and organizational transformation
01:37 Whitney's career journey: From litigation to legal operations
04:16 Why technology initiatives fail to create change
06:17 The human side of change management
09:28 Diagnosing why transformation efforts stall
11:30 What organizations misunderstand about technology adoption
13:26 Moving from AI experimentation to meaningful adoption
16:25 What it means to be an AI realist
17:31 AI fluency vs. accuracy and competence
20:34 Influencing people without formal authority
22:21 Understanding incentives and motivating stakeholders
23:41 Building influence through communication and connection
28:33 Aligning legal, technology, and business stakeholders
33:11 The role of in-house counsel in business strategy
35:26 Where in-house lawyers should begin
37:08 Whitney's key takeaway: People are the strategy
Whitney's hot take: Technology is not your strategy. Your people are your strategy.
AI can transform legal work, but lasting progress requires more than new tools. It takes strong leadership, continuous learning, human connection, and a clear understanding of how people actually work.
How can legal leaders make AI adoption more effective while keeping people at the center of transformation?
Tell us in the comments.
If you enjoy this legal tech podcast and podcast for lawyers, rate and review Notes to My Legal Self on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It helps more legal professionals discover these conversations.
Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be?
Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage.
Like, comment, and subscribe to @NotesToMyLegalSelf.
Explore more episodes at https://www.notestomylegalself.com
INTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®
#InHouseCounsel #PodcastForLawyers #LegalAI #LegalOperations #LegalTech #ChangeManagement #FutureOfLaw
Welcome to Season 15, Episode 6 of Notes to My Legal Self, the in-house counsel podcast for lawyers navigating AI, legal technology, leadership, and the future of legal work.
Adam Becker, Director of Legal Operations at Cockroach Labs, returns to the podcast to share his perspective on one of the biggest changes facing legal departments today: the shift from using AI as a tool to working with AI as an advisor.
For in-house lawyers, legal ops professionals, general counsel, and legal leaders, this conversation explores what it takes to move beyond checking the "AI box" and become more fluent in AI-native ways of working.
In this episode, you'll learn:
- Why legal operations is becoming essential to modern legal departments
- The difference between adopting AI and becoming AI-native
- How AI can help legal teams work differently, not just faster
- Why legal ops leaders need to understand how lawyers actually work
- How knowledge management enables better AI outcomes
- How to build trust when introducing AI to legal teams
- Why legal leaders should experiment rather than wait for a mandate
- How to identify practical workflows where AI can make an immediate difference
- Why sharing AI learnings across legal teams matters
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
03:00 Legal operations becomes essential
05:00 AI and the second stage of legal ops maturity
08:00 From systems to AI advisors
10:00 The evolution of the Core
1213:00 Knowledge management and AI
15:00 AI adoption vs. AI-native legal teams
19:00 What makes a strong legal ops leader
23:00 Building trust with lawyers
27:00 Taking initiative with AI
31:00 Where legal teams should start
35:00 Mistakes legal departments are making with AI
38:00 One action legal ops leaders should take
Adam's hot take: The biggest opportunity isn't simply saving 10% of your time, it's changing how you work.
What would you eliminate or simplify if you had an AI advisor working alongside you?
Tell us in the comments.
If you enjoy this legal tech podcast and podcast for lawyers, rate and review Notes to My Legal Self on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It helps more legal professionals discover the conversation.
Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be?
Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage.
Like, comment, and subscribe to @NotesToMyLegalSelf.
Explore more episodes at https://www.notestomylegalself.com
INTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®
#LegalOperations #LegalOps #AIinLegal #LegalTech #InHouseCounsel #PodcastForLawyers #FutureOfLaw
Welcome to Season 15, Episode 5 of Notes to My Legal Self, the in-house counsel podcast on legal judgment, leadership, and getting to yes. Carly McAllister, Associate General Counsel in financial services, joins Olga V. Mack to discuss the move from litigator to trusted business partner.
Made for in-house lawyers and general counsel, this conversation explores how legal teams can create confidence and possibility for the business, instead of only managing risk.
In this episode, you'll learn:
- How to transition from litigation to an in-house legal career
- Why in-house lawyers must think like business partners
- How to find responsible ways to get to "yes"
- How to develop legal judgment, and why there is no cap on it
- Why AI can amplify legal work but not replace judgment
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
04:33 Leaving litigation to go in-house
07:10 Becoming a business partner in financial services
12:41 Why technical excellence is not enough
16:35 Creating confidence with executives
20:13 How legal departments create possibility
27:24 Legal judgment in the age of AI
32:15 How to build good judgment
38:00 Final advice for future in-house lawyers
Carly's advice: technical legal skill is the foundation, not the finish line.
When was the last time your "no" came with a path to "yes"? Share your answer with us in the comments.
If you enjoy this lawyer podcast, rate and review Notes to My Legal Self on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It helps more in-house counsel find these conversations.
Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be? Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage.
Like, comment, and subscribe to @NotesToMyLegalSelf so you never miss an episode.
Explore more episodes at https://www.notestomylegalself.com
INTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®
#NotesToMyLegalSelf #InHouseCounsel #GeneralCounsel #LegalLeadership #LegalJudgment #LawyerPodcast
Welcome to Season 15, Episode 4 of Notes to My Legal Self, the in-house counsel podcast for lawyers who want to lead. Bradley Bald, In-House Counsel at Lifestyle Communities, joins Olga V. Mack to talk about burnout, taking a sabbatical, and why the power of the pause is an underrated legal leadership skill.
Bradley shares his path from private practice to in-house counsel at a vertically integrated real estate developer. He opens up about what a career pause really feels like, how to answer interview questions about a resume gap, and how cognitive empathy helps lawyers resolve conflict without absorbing other people's emotions.
In this episode, you'll learn:
- How to know when a sabbatical is the right move for your legal career
- Why most lasting regret comes from inaction, not action
- How to handle interview questions about a resume gap
- How the power of the pause improves negotiations and conflict resolution
- What cognitive empathy is and how it differs from sympathy
- How in-house lawyers add value beyond contracts as proactive business partners
Timestamps:
0:00 Introduction
0:35 Meet Bradley and Lifestyle Communities
2:10 From real estate to in-house counsel
3:53 Taking a sabbatical to prevent burnout
6:43 Returning to work after a career gap
11:12 The ""gray place"" during a career pause
13:09 Building visibility as an in-house lawyer
15:54 Handling interview questions about a resume gap
19:25 The power of the pause
25:51 Cognitive empathy vs sympathy
28:01 What executives expect from legal leaders
31:50 The decision that shaped his legal career
33:47 Final takeaway: life is long
Key takeaways:
- Career success comes in stages. Life is long, not short.
- A strategic pause can prevent burnout and create clarity.
- Listening and cognitive empathy often create more impact than a quick, witty answer.
Enjoyed this episode? Rate and review Notes to My Legal Self on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It helps more in-house lawyers find the show.
Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be? Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage.
Like, comment, subscribe, and hit the bell so you never miss an episode.
Subscribe: @NotesToMyLegalSelf
INTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®
#InHouseCounsel #LawyerPodcast #LegalLeadership #LawyerWellBeing #BurnoutPrevention
Welcome to Season 15, Episode 3 of Notes to My Legal Self, the in-house counsel podcast for lawyers who want to lead. Kemi Ijitimehin, an Atlanta-based advertising and ad tech attorney, joins Olga V. Mack to talk about the power of the pivot, building trust as product counsel, and growing from first-gen lawyer to trusted business partner.
Kemi shares her path from public policy in Washington, D.C., to the federal government during COVID, to in-house work at a tech company. She explains how her family's history shaped her comfort with change, how to turn rejection into redirection, and why authenticity is what turns lawyers into trusted strategic advisors.
In this episode, you'll learn:
- How to know when it's time to pivot your legal career
- How to turn rejection into redirection
- Why product counsel work is one of the most creative roles in law
- The difference between advising a business and helping build one
- What ""learning the business"" really means for in-house lawyers
- How authenticity builds trust and buy-in with stakeholders
- The first step to take after a layoff or career transition
Timestamps:
0:00 Introduction
1:03 Becoming an advertising and ad tech lawyer
3:08 Family roots and the power of the pivot
7:16 How to know when it's time to pivot
10:51 Can lawyers trust their gut?
12:03 Turning rejection into redirection
13:55 Creativity in product counsel work
15:43 What surprised her most about going in-house
17:33 Advising a business vs helping build one
20:26 How to build trust and buy-in
22:42 AI and the human side of lawyering
24:19 Thinking like a business leader
26:44 What ""learning the business"" really means
29:17 Becoming a trusted strategic advisor
31:34 First steps after a layoff or career transition
33:06 Final takeaway: be brave
Key takeaways:
- Pivoting starts with a feeling, but your ""why"" decides the right move.
- Relationships and authenticity matter as much as knowing the law.
- Learn the business by sitting in on engineering, product, and marketing meetings.
Enjoyed this episode? Rate and review Notes to My Legal Self on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It helps more in-house lawyers find the show.
Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be? Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage.
Like, comment, subscribe, and hit the bell so you never miss an episode.
Subscribe: @NotesToMyLegalSelf
INTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®
#InHouseCounsel #ProductCounsel #LawyerPodcast #LegalCareers #LegalLeadership
Welcome to Season 15, Episode 2 of Notes to My Legal Self, the in-house counsel podcast for lawyers who want to lead. Elizabeth Colombo, Associate General Counsel at Vendavo, returns to talk with Olga V. Mack about red lines, relationships, and real leadership.
Elizabeth shares how 14 years in-house taught her the psychology of contract negotiation, how to get comfortable with acceptable risk, and why embedded humanity makes in-house lawyers indispensable.
In this episode, you'll learn:
- Why negotiation is about people, not just the paper
- How to separate material risk from theoretical risk
- How to make the business want legal involved early
- How to resolve stakeholder conflict without being the bad guy
- The soft skills lawyers most often underestimate
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
03:04 Negotiation lessons: people, psychology, and risk
07:05 How to make the business want legal involved
10:59 Why in-house lawyers should assume they belong
14:32 What ""embedded humanity"" means
20:23 Handling stakeholder conflict
23:41 From referee to decision architect
29:07 Soft skills lawyers underestimate
34:37 Final takeaway: be human
Elizabeth's advice: in the age of AI, your human judgment is what sets you apart.
Is your legal team seen as the referee or the partner who helps make the call? Share your answer with us in the comments.
If you enjoy this lawyer podcast, rate and review Notes to My Legal Self on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It helps more in-house counsel find these conversations.
Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be? Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage.
Like, comment, and subscribe to @NotesToMyLegalSelf so you never miss an episode.
Explore more episodes at https://www.notestomylegalself.com
INTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®
#NotesToMyLegalSelf #InHouseCounsel #GeneralCounsel #LegalLeadership #ContractNegotiation #LawyerPodcast
Welcome to Season 15, Episode 1 of Notes to My Legal Self, the in-house counsel podcast for lawyers who want to lead. Alexandra Sepulveda, Associate General Counsel at Trust & Will, joins Olga V. Mack to explore how lawyers build legal judgment when AI does more of the thinking.
Alexandra shares her path from patent litigator to in-house counsel at General Mills, Kabam, and fast-growing startups. She explains what junior lawyers miss when AI drafts first, why judgment is different from benchmarking, and the simple habits she uses to keep her own "lawyer gut" sharp.
In this episode, you'll learn:
- What junior lawyers lose when they skip the early reps
- The human-AI-human "Oreo cookie" method for using AI well
- Why the purposeful pause is a negotiation tool AI can't replace
- The difference between legal judgment and knowing what's market
- How to spot and close judgment gaps on your legal team
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
03:34 Meet Alexandra and Trust & Will
05:11 From patent litigator to in-house counsel
09:23 The early work that teaches judgment
13:30 The power of the purposeful pause
16:02 How AI is changing legal team capacity
21:48 The human-AI-human method
24:53 Judgment vs. benchmarking
28:26 Why junior lawyers need informal mentors
32:35 Expecting senior judgment without junior reps
36:14 Redesigning law school for AI
39:00 Habits that build legal judgment
44:53 Final takeaway: stay curious
Alexandra's advice: stay curious, because no one is going to replace your gut.
Do you write your own first draft before asking AI, or let AI go first? Share your answer with us in the comments.
If you enjoy this lawyer podcast, rate and review Notes to My Legal Self on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. It helps more in-house counsel find these conversations.
Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be? Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage.
Like, comment, and subscribe to @NotesToMyLegalSelf so you never miss an episode.
Explore more episodes at https://www.notestomylegalself.com
INTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®
#NotesToMyLegalSelf #InHouseCounsel #LegalJudgment #AIinLaw #LegalLeadership #LawyerPodcast
Welcome to Season 14, Episode 10 of Notes to My (Legal) Self®, the in-house counsel podcast exploring AI, legal judgment, and the future of the legal profession.
Host Olga V. Mack talks with Dharshi Harindra, Assistant General Counsel for APAC at FTI Consulting, live from Singapore. Drawing on 20 years across big law, TMT, and data privacy in the UK, Australia, Dubai, and Singapore, Dharshi challenges the popular claim that ""AI won't replace lawyers, but lawyers who use AI will."" Her view: AI is a mirror, and without strong human judgment it only produces confident but risky answers faster.
This general counsel podcast conversation is for in-house lawyers, legal leaders, and anyone navigating legal tech and AI adoption.
In this episode, you'll learn:
- Why human judgment, not technical fluency, will set lawyers apart
- Which traditional lawyer labels are weakening and what is replacing them
- How AI can amplify bias, and why lawyers are positioned to correct it
- A practical framework for legal judgment: what matters, what doesn't, what happens next, and who owns the consequences
- How early-career lawyers can build judgment without years of ""learning by osmosis""
- Why legal tech needs subject matter experts at the table
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
01:06 Meet Dharshi: a global legal career from London to Singapore
03:48 Is ""lawyers who use AI will replace lawyers"" the right framing?
07:10 The lawyer labels that are weakening
11:35 How AI mirrors and amplifies bias
15:21 What legal judgment looks like in practice
21:29 Technically right vs. strategically wise
25:17 Why lawyers should document how they think
31:24 Skills early-career lawyers need now
35:13 Pairing legal tech with subject matter expertise
39:25 Redefining the exceptional lawyer
41:33 The profession five years from now
44:35 Final takeaway
If you enjoy this lawyer podcast, follow the show and leave a rating. It helps more in-house counsel and legal leaders find these conversations.
S U B S C R I B E!
Want to be a guest on NTMLS or know someone who should be? Reach out! Self-nominations are acts of courage. Engage with us below, like, comment, and subscribe to follow the future of in-house law!
Thank you for watching!
Like, Comment, Subscribe and hit the bell so you never miss an episode!
Subscribe to our channel: @NotesToMyLegalSelf
INTERSECTION OF LAW AND FUN®
#NotesToMyLegalSelf #LegalInnovation #LegalTech #FutureOfLaw #LegalLeadership
From the publisher's feed