Show Notes:

Mesa AZ Police Officer Charged With Murder to Receive No Jail Time.

Jennifer Rubin filed a complaint against Marc’s recent YouTube video that scrutinizes her lies and aggressive legal-attacks.

Why it is necessary to call-out bureaucratic criminals who disguise their criminal activities under the legal-fiction of “government.”

F.B.I. raids the LRN.fm studio.

Getting your notice of appeal prepared before the trial in anticipation of an inevitable railroading.

Applying anarchistic principals into the food chain.

“Forcing people to pay means never having to exercise good faith.”

What makes centuries-old documents applicable to me?

There is no such thing as a legitimate government or STATE.

Defending yourself against “blunt assertions of power.”

“De novo review in court wipes the slate clean, but it does not take away prior testimony that can be used for impeachment purposes.”

The differences between personam, subject-matter, and territorial jurisdiction.

Why the meeting of the minds is so important when it comes to contractual law. <- I know I have heard Elizabeth Warren go into detail about this somewhere on YouTube, but can’t find it at the moment

When the judge claims He has jurisdiction, it is proper to ask “is that because you say so or because the prosecution’s evidence says so? Which one?”

Caller’s Topics:

Eyal Lior from NSP Israel: update on the latest adventure in legal land <> the defense of necessity <> questioning and assessing the “protective value” of any particular “law” <> the judge mischaracterizes every question the defendant asks as an argument <> executing your activism as effectively as possible <> using your closing statement for injecting a powerful monologue of criticism based on the prosecutor’s lack of supporting evidence to prove their assertion/claim of jurisdiction <> the judge argues that hurting someone is the best way to deter future offenses (the reality is time and fines don’t stop crimes) <> and the president of the STATE of Israel is a vegetarian for morally conscious reasons.

Raymond from KS: children kidnapped and drugged by the STATE because of the parent’s choice of legal medicine <> protesting unfair STATE persecution by way of hunger strike <> Sheryl Shuman is coming to town to help campaign for peace from the government’s overzealous drug prosecutions <> appealing to the empathy of the masses/unprivileged-class <> the federal government incentivizes disrupting families through it’s use of federal grants and bonuses <> DFS victim support network to provide resources and legal defense education <> and please consider supporting those willing to stand up to the STATE.

Trevor from OR: dealing with simultaneous, multi-department legal-attacks <> collecting recordings with many different DOR agents attempting to get an answer to the question of “what evidence to you have to prove that your laws apply to me?” <> one agent tries to claim that the business license is what determines applicability of the law, but then retracts after more specific follow-up questioning <> after all failed attempts to provide evidence to prove jurisdiction, the agents conclude that a “legislative analyst” is the only person qualified to disclose how exactly the laws apply <> after demonstrating that the assessment agents have no evidence to support and prove their assertion of jurisdiction, they still do not “feel like” withdrawing their legal-attack in the slightest <> building a record of all the due-process violations, judicial, and prosecutorial misconduct you can catch in court <> in a speeding ticket case; the judge enters a plea on the defendant’s behalf (due-p[...]

Show Notes:

R.I.P. to loved ones, Keith Emerson, and Joe Santos.

Once again, debunking the pseudo-criticism from the FMOTL/sovereign citizen -types that there has been “no success” in effectively challenging the prosecutor’s evidence to prove their assertion of jurisdiction.

The heavily used citation that “…every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only…” is not actually in the ruling from the case they’re citing.

A BIG thank you to those who have contributed, and those yet to contribute, towards funding the production and operational expenses to help us continue to bring you the many resources available here on the site.

Maine prosecutor, Greg Bearnstien, has a hard time coming to grips with the fact that “monetary support for government” is, for all intents and purposes; “pay or get shot” through a series of emails.

In Ian Freeman’s administrative DMV hearing, you’ll notice the prosecutor, Jean Killham, does not object to the repeated accusations of prosecutorial misconduct Marc made against her.

Pro-tip: the only way for a judge to summarily deny a motion to dismiss based upon the prosecution’s lack of fact to substantiate their charges is for the prosecution to produce the facts in question.

Role-playing courtroom litigation with others to strengthen your objections when you’re doing it live.

Questioning the conflict-of-interest between the STATE-paid prosecutor and the STATE-paid judge and keeping the burden-of-proof on them.

Recognizing when any of the courtroom officers have acted beyond their bounds according to their own mandate.

Zeroing-in on the prosecution’s lack of evidence when you make your objections to the judge who would like to assume jurisdiction without the prosecutor putting up any real evidence.

Sanctioning the prosecutor from making biased and unproven legal determinations and statements.

Anarchy is a rejection of double-standards and a two-tiered ruling-class that impose a learned helplessness.

Sam Harris’ inconsistencies and double-standards.

The inherent anger and vile hatred from the “if you don’t like it, then leave” crowd.

How to counter courtroom bullying.

Simplifying the unsigned plea of guilty tactic: “I intend on pleading guilty, does the prosecution have evidence to prove the laws apply to me? and if so; then where specifically is it?”

The predictable childish behavior that asking for grounds for their decision will illicit from a judge.

If they deny your discovery request, then file a motion in liminie disallowing them from making any arguments outside what limited facts they have disclosed to you.

The importance of having a media rep present at your hearing when you have an off-the-hinges type judge.

Another won for the critics: Tait from WI recently had a effective damage-control success story using the motion to dismiss which was granted in very explicit terms.

The same challenges you’d make in a minor traffic citation are the same challenges you’d be making in a felony possession case.

Caller’s Topics:

Franklin from IN: mailed the police officer a letter asking if he’d be willing to withdraw the citation on grounds of a rebuttal of presumptions that no one was hurt and there was no damage <> the judge summarily denied a motion to dismiss raising the issues of no injured party and no jurisdiction <> the judge condescendingly stonewalls the defendant’s questions to better understand the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings <> the judge admitted that they “assume jurisdiction” <> what can you do to ensure you receive responsive answers and clarification to your questions in court? <> building fall-back options if you primary defense goes awry in court <> and it has proven slightly more forthcoming to use [...]

JT returns to share some analysis on a number of ongoing legal-attacks that we’re following in legal-land, and Noel from MI joins in the last segment to provide an update on his recent attempt of effective damage-control.

Show Notes:

The campaign to end daylight savings time.

Disengaging from the political circus.

Defeating counter-arguments against veganism.

Mesa police officer who shot unarmed man ‘in shock’ from second-degree murder charge.

Marc’s number of interactions with the infamously abusive Mesa PD.

The statist double-standard evidenced in the confidence that the ruling-class have when it comes to not being criminally charged for their easily provable criminal actions.

Spotlighting one of the rare cases where statists eat their own: a former cop convicted of rape.

Litigating with the wisdom that an issue of fact is much stronger than an issue of law/legal-opinion.

Dodgy Dan Evans‘ long-standing decline to come on the show to defend his opinions and conclusions because he can’t stand actually being challenged.

Blunt assertions of power and logic.

The more specific they have to be exposes the lack of merit their position actually has.

IRS attorney Jennifer Ruben lied when she said “the taxpayer relied on frivolous arguments” when the defense/”taxpayer” was trying to use the IRS’s own statements/admissions that they “weren’t qualified and had no evidence” to support the basis of their complaint.

Prosecutors must have facts to substantiate their legal assertions and charges. (duh)

IRS attorney Jennifer Ruben’s 10 points rebutting the defendant’s position was entirely based upon legal opinion and not a single bit of fact.

The common fate of statesmen that suddenly catch a terminal case of integrity, such as with Budd Dwyer.

Greg Bernstein claims they “don’t need evidence” to substantiate their assertions and that whether the law applies is “a matter of law.”

Struggling with the statist double-standard with Greg Bernstein.

“A blunt assertion of power is the price we pay for a civilized society.”

Countering dismissive responses, like the overzealous excuse of “frivolous“, to your questions of evidence.

Sam Harris believes that “if you’re an anarchist; you’re an imbecile.”

Upping the $5,000 challenge to anyone who can produce evidence of a citizen or STATE.

Terry’s latest persecutorial legal-attack: a $50,000 bail bond set for a minor traffic violation.

Noel spent 5 days in the slammer for contempt for asking for clarification.

The clerk could not file the defendant’s motions because there was no case or complaint filed in their system at the time of arraignment.

Filing a writ of prohibition and motion to change the judge to stop the judge from abusing you with jail-time for questioning the prosecution’s evidence.

The issue of challenging jurisdiction can be made at any time.

The inherent conflict-of-interest between the varying STATE court officers.

A pre-trial hearing is when you are supposed to receive discovery and Brady material on all the facts and evidence (including exculpatory) the prosecution has against you.

Pro-tip: the only way to overcome a motion to dismiss based on a lack of evidence is to produce the evidence in question.

Why would they fight a traffic ticket where the defendant is intending to plead guilty?

Filing a claim with risk management against the county when you’ve got an abusive judge or prosecutor.

Excellent support for prepping for litigation from the NSP group-chat.

Going into court pro per knowing that sticking up for yourself comes with its risks.

The post NSP – Mar 12, 2016 – Co-host: JT and Guest: Noel appeared first on MarcStevens.net.

The post NSP – Mar 12, 2016 – Co-host: JT and Guest: Noel appeared first on MarcStevens.net.

Show Notes:

Why we are anarchists and what anarchy actually means (a rejection of a ruling-class and double-standards in society), despite the common popular distortions.

Living consistently with your principals and beliefs: veganism and anarchism.

Identifying fallacious arguments.

Black Sabbath‘s Geezer Butler‘s life of veganism.

Following up on last week’s reports of a reply brief with an empathy-deficient tax attorney in California and a Maine bureaucrat that conflates a legal conclusion/opinion with a fact.

The issues raised in a parking ticket case are the same issues raised for most other legal attacks.

Countering the catch-all dismissive reply that your questions are “gibberish.”

Calling out courtroom lying, bullying, and conflicts-of-interest.

Requesting a change of judge and a striking the plea the judge forced upon you.

Getting confirmation on whether the prosecution’s assertions are irrefutable (because irrefutable presumptions are a violation of fairness and due-process and qualify as misconduct when permitted.)

The only things that separates government from a criminal cartel is the perception that their laws legitimately apply.

Using media to keep hot-headed judges on their best behavior.

Responding to spam phone calls.

Argument Clinic – Monty Python’s The Flying Circus: differentiating between an argument and a contradiction.

The argument that jurisdiction is based on physical location has been made many lawyers and super lawyers alike.

If you value this website, forum, podcasts and videos; please consider donating a small amount so we can continue to bring you such content-rich media.

“Is that because you say so or because the prosecution’s evidence says so?”

Keep focusing on the prosecution’s lack of evidence at every turn of dialog.

The famous Gerry Spence and his zero-loss criminal trial record.

Pro-tip: call the prosecutor before filing your motion to dismiss so you have the opportunity to use their admissions within your paperwork.

The only way for the prosecution to legitimately defeat a motion to dismiss that is based upon their lack of evidence is for them to produce the evidence in question.

How to respond when they give you the common dismissive lines “the evidence (to prove jurisdiction) is on the ticket” or “don’t you have a driver’s license?“

The inherent conflict-of-interest between the STATE judge, STATE prosecutor, and STATE witness.

Stopping the endless cycle of statist circular logic and other logical fallacies using Socratic questioning.

The length of the fight scene in “They Live” symbolizes the long struggle people have coming to grips with a hard reality.

Ridding oneself of contradictory positions.

Filing a motion in limine for good measure. (found in the motion package in the store)

The quantifiable results from the many efforts over the years.

Leveraging the prosecution’s failure to provide the facts to set forth a valid complaint.

Caller’s Topics:

Mark from England: the judge only wants to hear “guilty” or “not guilty” and nothing else, despite utilizing the unsigned plea of guilty <> the judge says challenging what evidence the prosecution has to prove an essential element of the offense (jurisdiction) is “a load of nonsense” <> building a case for an abuse of process hearing on grounds of extreme prejudice <> the judge mischaracterizes asking questions of evidence that the prosecution needs to prove their allegations as “arguing FMOTL” legal theories <> security officers were dispatched to the courtroom where they began intimidating and falsely accusing the defendant of using a recording device <> the judge ended the hearing with threatening the defendant with arrest for failure to appear to the next hearing despite no history of truancy <> being able to[...]

Show Notes:

It is more likely to achieve abolitionist objectives on the local level than on the federal level.

The fundamentals required for snowballing movements of mass non-compliance.

A presumption of correctness must be supported by a minimum amount of fact(s), to which you can question specifically what those facts are.

Pro-tip: an issue of fact is a simpler and much stronger defensive posture than any issue of law or legal interpretation.

IRS attorney Jennifer Ruben lied when she said “the taxpayer relied on frivolous arguments” when the defense/”taxpayer” was trying to use the IRS’s own statements/admissions that they “weren’t qualified and had no evidence” to support the basis of their complaint.

Dean Confronts Pitt Meadows City Council.

A question is not an argument, same as a legal argument is not a statement of fact.

Anarchy: the rejection of a violent ruling-class and their double-standard that the basic principals of wrong and right don’t apply to you simply because you call yourself “a government.”

You’re not pleading when you have a motion hearing, that’s challenging jurisdiction on a factual basis, pending.

Upcoming overhaul of the scripts to better avoid the “psych-eval” threat.

Free-market win: your Bitcoin are welcome at Maya Pizza in Mesa, AZ!

Getting your motion set for a hearing on the issues outlaid within the document is a huge feat in of itself!

When the judge makes a declarative statement; always clarify if “it’s because ‘he says so‘ or because the prosecution’s evidence says so?”

Role-playing impeaching a witness that is not qualified to make legal determinations and doesn’t have personal firsthand-knowledge of the facts and evidence.

The obvious double-standard of consequences for money laundering of narco-traffickers between Ross Ulbricht and the large commercial banks.

Bureaucratic double-talk.

Always get a copy of the back of the ticket.

How does the use of the roads make the constitution apply to anybody?

Why would you defend a violent ruling class?

Government can be simply defined as, and is synonymous with, “comply-or-die.”

Caller’s Topics:

Al from CO: what do you make of the Donald Trump phenomenon? <> are you familiar with Lysander Spooner‘s “No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority” and Frédéric Bastiat‘s “The Law“? <> and the increasing percentages of people that are non-compliant: 45% of households will not pay federal income tax this year.

Phil from NJ: Marc is going about challenging bureaucrats (by questioning their evidence and facts) the wrong way, suggests using legal definitions from Black’s law dictionary 2 (legal opinion) as a better alternative <> struggling with conflicting and differing interpretive definitions of legal terms <> why are the judges inconsistently granting dismissal for some cases and not others? <> how mob mentality is a really scary thing (see James’ IRS persecution) <> and the government can’t prove there is any valid contract between a citizen and STATE.

Scar from AZ: update on 4 ongoing legal attacks; two convictions that need to be appealed, a motion hearing Monday, and ___ <> the judge agreed that the defendant is presumed innocent of every element of the charge and that jurisdiction was an element subject to challenge <> keeping focus on the prosecution’s burden-of-proof <> the court forced a plea upon the defendant [*due-process violation] and threatened them with a “psych-evals” to intimidate the defendant for asking questions THEY are very uncomfortable answering <> and polishing litigation skills to better operate in the face of aggressive courtroom intimidation.

Tom MIXX reports from the NSP Skype group-chat: a lawyer from the peanut gallery[...]

Show Notes:

Upcoming video of recent adventures in composting.

Remembering the accomplishments and contributions of the late Harper Lee and Antonin Scalia.

Anonymous calls for action to occupy Mesa Police Department.

Recent interview with a few Irish radio hosts joined by Vincent Byrne.

Occupy the Courts to disrupt their revenue generation in response to their ongoing abuses and wrongdoing like in the Worcester Revolution of 1774.

Local authoritarians leveraging municipal violations that victimize the most vulnerable in our communities.

Bureaucrats that are dangerously blind to their own psychopathy.

Measuring talent and artistry a little more objectively.

Requesting an abuse of process hearing when the counts of due-process violations and misconduct begin to stack up.

A writ is simply used to instruct the court officers to do or not do something.

Pro-tip: when they tell you they “don’t need any evidence” or “we don’t have to prove that” in response to your questions of evidence: “oh, you can act in good faith AND withhold evidence from me?”

Pro-tip: when getting answers to questions you didn’t ask and not getting answers to the question(s) you did ask, its helpful (for sake of clarity) to ask them “what question do you think you are answering?” and compare that to the question you are actually asking so its easier for them to see where they are missing what you’re asking.

Asking them “specifically where in this document is the evidence I am asking for?” when they tell you “its on the website,” “its on the ticket,” ect.

Keep it short and to the point when drafting your paperwork, or risk that they’ll skim-and-deny.

Setting a motion hearing on the court’s motion day to get direct access to the prosecutor and their (lack of) evidence.

Knowing your leverage points and effectively utilizing them.

Dan Gould is at a Satoshi Square Trading Event at Maya NY Pizza and Grill who is now accepting Bitcoin for payment!

Ticket Kicked in Florida – Congrats Mirko.

The benefit of using a motion rather than writing letters is that they are obligated, under due-process, to respond to your motion.

Falling back on the Socratic questioning method when you get bogus responses from the judge and/or prosecutor.

The only way for the persecution team (prosecutor and co-prosecutor/judge) can legitimately defeat your motion to dismiss is to provide the evidence that the motion claims is lacking, everything else is just a diversion away from their lack of evidence.

When the respond to your questions with vague generalities, that’s your cue to follow up with questions of specificity to uncover that their responses are empty and actually have no evidence.

Two main questions you should be hammering away at: 1) what evidence to you have to prove your rules apply to me?, and 2) what witnesses have personal firsthand knowledge of such evidence?

Don’t allow the prosecutor to shift the burden-of-proof onto you.

Caller’s Topics:

Imran, Gary, and Calvin from MO: conversation and luncheon amongst fellow anarchists <> Texas man arrested by seven U.S. Marshals for not paying $1,500 student loan from 1987 <> Judge Orders Former Pastor Arrested For Handing Out Jury Nullification Fliers <> The U.S. Hosts 25 Percent Of The World’s Prison Population <> the lack of multimedia documentation in the supreme court, why don’t they want us seeing their interpretations of their law? <> the bar is administered by a private British guild legal theory <> the comparatively small numbers of people it takes to make social change actually happen <> and taking off to mingle with the locals in Ferguson, MO.

Jay and Gary from England: Marc helped with getting Matt’s ticket kicked from court on grounds of a “lack of evidence proving jurisdiction” <> helping a friend o[...]