Think about the lens through which we look at and examine our lives (and make decisions based on what we see.) It seems to come down to the question of: What are you optimizing for?

American society's lens is very much encouraging us to optimize for:

• Finding jobs that contribute to society, keep the economic engine going, and allow us to play our part in consumerism culture
• Pairing up, get married, and have children (which also contributes to the above point)
• Contribute to society in ways that benefit the common good (volunteer, give to charity, etc)
• Participate in activities that promote American values and Nationalism (church, sports, etc)

However: Many people eventually (or at least at some point in time) find themselves at odd with this way of living. This is all very tied to game theory, but it's the concept that reality is just one big dream/simulation, and if you know that, you're operating at a different level than most people who don't zoom out to acknowledge the game, just stay down in the weeds.

So, as such: are you playing the game as the main character, or are you an NPC/supporting character in someone else's story?

Today's Q: Is there a version of living where you can live a version of your life that's authentic to you and your gut read on what feels right/wrong, even if it's at odds with the "normal" version we've been programmed to strive for? Is it OK to optimize for the version of life that feels like you're taking care of yourself the best way you can, even if it's at odds with previous decisions? Are we allowed to change, and CAN we?

We all build unique internal worlds that are informed by our experiences, the books we've read, the movies/shows we watch, the social media we consume, etc. These all shape our worldview and are one of the big reasons there have been book-burning campaigns over the years, religious teachings that say things like "don't watch this, don't read that, it's smut," and another reason we now have SO MANY different media sources that validate every possible POV on key issues in life.

Today we're exploring this question: How thoughtful are you about your inputs, and have you established any best practices that you've found helpful? 

Today's topic was inspired by this article titled Don Quixote & Narrative Identity in a recent edition of Philosophy Now: https://philosophynow.org/issues/161/Don_Quixote_and_Narrative_Identity.

Our general theme is: We are the stories we tell ourselves and our character in that story is always evolving.

Today we're taking a new approach and trying something new by going deep on ONE question.

The question for this episode: What is TRUE?

For more context: One of the most nuanced things about being a human and having a human brain is that almost all the time, many conflicting things are true at the same time. So, how do you filter and land on what you believe is real/true/reliable?

This is especially important during an election year (one reason of many it's top-of-mind) when news angles put all kinds of spins on information within the media context. But this also applies to how we decide which "narrators" within our lives to trust: Parents, partners, friends, etc. vs. our "gut feelings" (fueled by our internal nervous systems.)

How do you know when to defer to logic (past patterns, existing info, and context) and when to defer to your gut (and those feelings of, THIS FEELS RIGHT/WRONG even though it goes against logic.) So: Heart vs. head decision-making when it comes to answering: What's really true here in this situation I'm evaluating?

In our first episode of season two, we got together in Austin to get into the (very gross) upcoming cicada fest, Caitlin Clark's impact, thinking processes, and the seven types of rest (plus more.)

In this episode of Off The Clock, Kaleigh, Allie, and Krista discuss:

• Golden retriever energy: What is it and is it attractive?
• The pressure for women to choose between aging naturally and getting work done
• Can love be truly unconditional?
• Our biggest quirks and why we love them

🎧 Listen now for more!

In today's Off The Clock, Allie, Kaleigh, and Krista talk about:

• The controversial fake AI Taylor Swift images and whether we can control deepfakes or misinformation in the age of AI
• The problem with the "legging legs" trend
• Are you a bunny, deer, fox, or cat?
• What would you eat if you had to choose your LAST meal on earth?

Listen now 🎧

For ep 15, Krista, Kaleigh, and Allie decided to take OTC from Zoom back to the real world. What is this, the 90s?

In this episode:

• Saltburn and the Golden Globes
• Can a constant state of desire offer purpose and happiness?
• Why do we tend to express our identities through the things we consume? Is this inherently good/bad?
• Go-to hangover food
• Moreeee

Cheers!

In the first Off The Clock episode of 2024 (🎉), Kaleigh, Krista, and Allie chat about:

• The decline of "monoculture" and whether that decline is a good or bad thing
• Our words/intentions we're setting for the new year
• What would you do if you won $450 million?
• Strength optimizers vs. Balance optimizers

And, of course, so much more 🎧 🤌

So long, 2023 👋 In the last Off The Clock episode of the year, Krista, Allie, and Kaleigh reflect on their years and chat about:

• Whether New Years resolutions are good or bad
• The best thing they bought/did/tried in 2023
• The "Chameleon Problem" 
• The most uncomfortable things they've had to do for work

Listen now 🎧