Generally, they may be taxable, but a temporary exemption applies subject to conditions.

Malaysian resident companies and limited liability partnerships (LLPs) can benefit from an exemption on foreign-sourced dividend income received in Malaysia from 1 January 2022 to 31 December 2026, provided the relevant conditions are satisfied.

Key conditions include:

• The dividend has been subject to tax in the foreign jurisdiction; and
• The headline/maximum corporate income tax rate in that jurisdiction is at least 15%.

Key takeaway: Foreign-sourced dividends received by Malaysian companies are not automatically exempt. The foreign tax paid and the applicable foreign jurisdiction’s tax rate must be considered to determine whether the exemption applies.

Generally, no, provided the Labuan vehicle is genuinely a qualifying Labuan entity and its income is taxed under the Labuan Business Activity Tax Act 1990 (LBATA).

A Labuan entity may be subject to the applicable 3% tax regime where the relevant conditions are satisfied, while the alternative RM20,000 election may apply in certain circumstances.

However, if the entity does not qualify for Labuan treatment and the interest is instead treated under Malaysia’s ordinary income tax rules, foreign-source interest remitted to Malaysia may be subject to Malaysian tax, depending on the taxpayer and applicable exemption.

Key takeaway: The answer depends on whether the entity genuinely falls within the Labuan tax regime. Labuan status, the nature of the activity, substance requirements, and the applicable tax treatment should all be verified before concluding that the interest is outside Malaysia’s ordinary remittance rules.

Generally, resident individuals in Malaysia may be exempt from Malaysian income tax on foreign-sourced income received in Malaysia, provided the relevant exemption conditions are satisfied.

The exemption broadly covers all classes of foreign-sourced income, except income from a partnership business in Malaysia.

A key condition is that the foreign income must generally have been subjected to tax in the country from which it is derived.

The current exemption is available from 1 January 2022 through 31 December 2036, subject to the applicable conditions.

Key takeaway: For Malaysian resident individuals, foreign-sourced income is not automatically taxable simply because it is received in Malaysia. The type of income, whether foreign tax was paid, and the applicable exemption conditions must be considered.

No. Singapore generally does not impose a separate capital gains tax. Genuine capital gains are typically not taxable, including gains from the disposal of foreign investments.

However, the distinction between capital gains and trading income is important. Gains from foreign shares may be treated as taxable income where the circumstances indicate that the transactions are part of a trade or business, such as a pattern of frequent trading or an intention to trade for profit.

Key takeaway: Singapore generally does not tax genuine capital gains, but gains that are recharacterised as trading income may be subject to income tax.

Before 1 January 2022, Malaysia generally provided a broad exemption for foreign-sourced income received in Malaysia.

From 1 January 2022, that blanket exemption was removed. As a result, foreign-sourced income received in Malaysia by a Malaysian tax resident generally became subject to Malaysian income tax, subject to specific exemptions and transitional measures introduced subsequently.

Key takeaway: The 2022 reform marked a significant shift from Malaysia’s previous broad exemption approach toward a taxation-on-receipt/remittance framework, although subsequent exemptions mean the current treatment depends on the type of income and taxpayer.

Generally, no. Rental income from property located in London is foreign-sourced income and is generally not subject to Hong Kong Profits Tax or Salaries Tax, provided the rental activity does not form part of a trade, profession, or business carried on in Hong Kong.

Key takeaway: Simply being a Hong Kong resident or receiving London rental income in Hong Kong does not, by itself, make the rental income taxable in Hong Kong. The nature and source of the rental activity must still be considered.

Yes. Certain entities are excluded from the Hong Kong FSIE regime for specified types of foreign-sourced income.

The exclusion can apply to foreign-sourced interest, dividends, and non-IP disposal gains accruing to:

• Regulated financial entities, such as authorized insurers, banks, or licensed securities dealers; or
• Traders, where the relevant income is derived from or incidental to their regulated or trading business.

Key takeaway: The FSIE regime does not apply uniformly to every MNE entity. Where a regulated financial entity or qualifying trader falls within the relevant exclusion, specified foreign-sourced income may remain outside the FSIE regime.

Generally, no. Labuan entities are subject to the Labuan Business Activity Tax Act 1990 (LBATA) rather than Malaysia’s ordinary income tax regime, subject to the nature of their activities and applicable conditions.

• Non-trading activities: A Labuan entity may generally elect to pay either RM20,000 or 3% of audited net profits, subject to the applicable rules.
• Trading activities: A qualifying Labuan entity that satisfies the relevant substance requirements may benefit from the 3% tax rate rather than a 0% rate.

Key takeaway: Labuan companies should not simply be treated as ordinary Malaysian companies for remittance-tax purposes. Their tax treatment depends on their Labuan status, business activity, substance, and the specific income involved.

Under Hong Kong’s FSIE regime, the nexus requirement limits the amount of foreign-sourced IP income that can qualify for exemption based on the proportion of qualifying R&D expenditure incurred in developing the relevant IP asset.

Qualifying expenditure generally includes R&D activities carried out by:

• The Hong Kong entity itself;
• An associated person; or
• A non-associated person.

The greater the proportion of qualifying R&D expenditure relative to the total expenditure incurred to develop the IP asset, the greater the proportion of IP income that may qualify for exemption.

Key takeaway: The nexus approach links the tax benefit directly to the substantive R&D activity supporting the IP, rather than simply where the IP is legally owned.

Under Section 13 of Malaysia’s Income Tax Act 1967, employment income is generally sourced based on where the employment is physically exercised.

Therefore, employment income is generally treated as Malaysia-sourced when the employee performs their duties in Malaysia, regardless of:

• Where the employment contract was signed;
• Where the employer is located; or
• Where the salary is paid.

Key takeaway: For Malaysian employment income, the place where the duties are physically performed is the key sourcing factor—not the location of the employer, contract, or bank account.