PS Audio, through it’s Infinity IRS V speakers as well as its own AN Series of reference loudspeaker, enjoy some of the best sound in the world. Surprisingly, a Mac Mini is at the heart of this exotic system.

Wouldn’t a speaker pair sound better without a passive crossover inside and will PS Audio ever consider going with an active loudspeaker?

Is an audio product costing 4 to 5 times more than another worth the extra money? Are there 4 to 5 times the benefits to be enjoyed for that extra money?

When stereo recordings were first introduced singers could be found in the left or right channels as could instruments. Today there seems to be no such separation. What happened?

How is it possible that adding another unit in the signal chain can be better than having everything contained within one box with a shorter signal path for stereo?

Speaker toe in can make or break the imaging of a good stereo system. How do you know when it’s correct and is there a simple setup procedure to follow?

PS Audio engineers worked what seems nearly a lifetime of endlessly tweaking and polishing their products to the highest standards of resolution only to have them perform on unresolving systems of customers. What’s the point?

Plenty of speakers, from the lowest cost to the highest, have dual sets of binding posts on them to facilitate bi-amping. Is this just a gimmick or is it valuable?

When we go to a concert or live event it’s pretty much in mono yet when we reproduce it on our home audio system it’s always in stereo. Would we not be better served to have a mono presentation rather than stereo?

Low frequency speakers have little in the way of directional cues so why would anyone consider a stereo pair of subwoofers if you can’t tell where they are coming from?