Since thoughts are of systems and the minimum thinkable set is the minimum structural system of Universe, the tetrahedron, not the cube as it would be a toy block or any cube in and of itself. The difference turns out to be triangling not squaring shown in Synergetics 990.01.
Triangling is more economical than squaring since every square consists of two triangles for example, 2 to the 2nd power equals four. That is four triangles. If nature’s self-multiplication of numbers which Bucky Fuller writes is twice as efficient as ‘squaring,’ then we can easily recall, “Nine=None=Zero.”
In other words, since nine is zero, it is none, meaning there is a discoverable octave pattern to be identified respecting resonance field and the atomic computer complex and more, of course, that metaphysical intellect as a function of Universe can delve into. Octave is a musical interval of eight tones. Octave is eight and represents the number 8 in whichever connotation and application of it is decided by innovative intellect. Perhaps humans think octavely with nary a thought of the octave limit of variation nor octahedron or octave wave model. But soon enough as we explore the geometry of thinking at Omniscient Universe Church, we are informed from R. Buckminster Fuller Synergetics Dictionary, April 9, 1975, that the inside-out tetrahedron’s eight hedra triangles are the same eight triangles deployed by the vector equilibrium. It provides a model for the octave wave limit at the number eight where the wave turns back again before the zero-nineness.