This week on the On Your mind neuroscience podcast:
Kathryn may have abandoned Liam, but she left him in the capable hands of birthday boy and returning guest Ian Mahar (@ianmahar). Ian is in one of the most exciting phases of a PhD, the endzone, where life consists of writing papers, theses, and postdoc proposals. Back in the lab, Liam has realized that he should use his supervisor for guidance and support (sometimes called supervision) instead of waiting to come up with solutions to every problem on his own. While frittering away time in the lab, Liam's been catching up on some of our competition, aka other great science and neuroscience podcasts. Check out Axons and Axioms if you're into the intersection of neuroscience and philosophy, Brain Matters for engaging interviews with experts in their field, Goggles Optional for an irreverent take on the latest science news, and You Are Not So Smart for the latest in the science of self delusion. Ian has been getting into the pros and cons of open peer review, where the authors of a paper know which peers reviewed it. While both sides make some good points, he comes down in favour of maintaining our current anonymous system, which has less room to start fights, while Liam is a little more bullish on open reviews, as long as that bull is running slowly so we can jump out of the way if it looks too dangerous. Finally, in our paper this week (open access here) we discuss the role of aromatse neurons, which convert testosterone to estrogen, in aggression and other behaviours you probably thought testosterone did without becoming estrogen first. For full links, show notes and all our other episodes, head to www.onyourmind.ca