In this episode we look at the story of Jacob returning from his 14 year absence from the Promised Land, and how he proactively seeks to meet with his brother Esau. Jacob anticipates Esau will treat him badly, so he sends messengers ahead of him to offer Esau gifts so that he can "kippur" Esau's "face" in hopes that Esau will "accept" him. The meaning of the Hebrew word "kippur" is most often translated as "atone", but the actual meaning of the word is debated. Some say it only means to wipe, to cover, to purge, or cleanse. But some say it only means to pacify, appease, or satisfy.
Those who say it means to "pacify" or "appease" look to this story of Jacob offering Esau gifts as a way to "kippur" Esau's "face" as an illustration of the penal satisfaction model of atonement where Jacob represents us, Esau represents God and his anger towards us, and the animals offered to Esau by Jacob represent Jesus offering himself to God as a way to "pacify" or "appease" God's wrath.
In reality, the story illustrates an entirely different scenario. First, let's start by noticing that the text says in Genesis 32:20 that Jacob wants to "kippur" Esau's "face." It sort of reminds us of the idea of someone who has a smirk on their face, and someone looks at them and says, "wipe that smirk off your face." Apparently, when Jacob imagines seeing Esau's face he imagines an unpleasant image. And he is hoping his offering of gifts to Esau will somehow "wipe that look off of Esau's face".
It's also really interesting that when Esau meets Jacob in Genesis 33:1-17, Esau's reaction to Jacob is the exact opposite of Jacob expects - Esau runs to Jacob and embraces him, falls on his neck and kisses him! They both burst into tears and crying with one another. When Esau asks Jacob about all the herds of animals, Jacob tells him they were intended to be given to Esau as a way of gaining favor in his sight. But notice what Esau says to Jacob, "I have enough." This is quite profound if we follow the proposal that this story somehow represents Esau as God, Jacob as us, and the gifts as Jesus somehow offering himself to "appease" or "pacify" God's anger.
What's even more interesting is that Jacob goes on to tell Esau that seeing his face was like seeing the face of God. As it turns out, not only does this story illustrate the exact opposite of a penal satisfaction model of atonement - that God does not need to have the anger "wiped off his face" by the sacrifice of Jesus, but Jacob himself assumes that to see the face of God is somehow similar to seeing the kind of face that Esau has just shown him. Far from reinforcing a penal satisfaction model of atonement, this story actually illustrates a more fundamental truth - God always wants to meet with us!
We then go to the New Testament where the Greek translation of this Hebrew word "kippur" is used in 1 John. There Greek word is hilasterion, and the interesting thing is that John uses this term in the context of cleansing, and purging - not pacifying or appeasing.
For a detailed article on how the Hebrew word "kippur" is used in the Old Testament, see the chapter "God's Reconciling Work: Atonement in the Old Testament" in the book T&T Clark Companion to Atonement. For a pdf copy, click here
Explainer Video on how to use www.biblehub.com and www.blueletterbible.org
Leave us a question or comment at our website podcast page.
* Intro Music: "Admirable" Carlos Herrera Music