As we wind down the application portion of our study, one more issue ought to be addressed. When it comes to the examples we find in the New Testament of God's word, what should we look for? When are they binding? How can we discern what details within those examples are incidental and which ones are significant?

From time to time, it's helpful to rigorously analyze why one example should rightly be understood to be instructive while another is not. Exercises like this can protect us from concluding that we can't expect to find instruction in examples. They may even equip us to recognize some overlooked instructions in New Testament examples.

A Case Study

Consider the description of the disciples' assembly in Acts 20:7-8.

On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight. There were many lamps in the upper room where we were gathered.

Luke has preserved quite a few details for us in just these two sentences.

> It was the first day of the week.

> The disciples were gathered together.

> They had gathered together to break bread.

> Paul addressed the disciples who were gathered.

> He intended to depart the next day.

> He prolonged his speech until midnight.

> The disciples were gathered in an upper room.

> There were many lamps in the upper room.

Take the time to carefully think about these details. How should we treat them? How should they be applied today? Should they all be applied? If not, which ones should be applied, and how can we know? Here they are again. Which details continue to carry modern significance?

As we wind down the application portion of our study, one more issue ought to be addressed. When it comes to the examples we find in the New Testament of God's word, what should we look for? When are they binding? How can we discern what details within those examples are incidental and which ones are significant?

From time to time, it's helpful to rigorously analyze why one example should rightly be understood to be instructive while another is not. Exercises like this can protect us from concluding that we can't expect to find instruction in examples. They may even equip us to recognize some overlooked instructions in New Testament examples.

A Case Study

Consider the description of the disciples' assembly in Acts 20:7-8.

On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight. There were many lamps in the upper room where we were gathered.

Luke has preserved quite a few details for us in just these two sentences.

> It was the first day of the week.

> The disciples were gathered together.

> They had gathered together to break bread.

> Paul addressed the disciples who were gathered.

> He intended to depart the next day.

> He prolonged his speech until midnight.

> The disciples were gathered in an upper room.

> There were many lamps in the upper room.

Take the time to carefully think about these details. How should we treat them? How should they be applied today? Should they all be applied? If not, which ones should be applied, and how can we know? Here they are again. Which details continue to carry modern significance?

As we wind down the application portion of our study, one more issue ought to be addressed. When it comes to the examples we find in the New Testament of God's word, what should we look for? When are they binding? How can we discern what details within those examples are incidental and which ones are significant?

From time to time, it's helpful to rigorously analyze why one example should rightly be understood to be instructive while another is not. Exercises like this can protect us from concluding that we can't expect to find instruction in examples. They may even equip us to recognize some overlooked instructions in New Testament examples.

A Case Study

Consider the description of the disciples' assembly in Acts 20:7-8.

On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul talked with them, intending to depart the next day, and he prolonged his speech until midnight. There were many lamps in the upper room where we were gathered.

Luke has preserved quite a few details for us in just these two sentences.

> It was the first day of the week.

> The disciples were gathered together.

> They had gathered together to break bread.

> Paul addressed the disciples who were gathered.

> He intended to depart the next day.

> He prolonged his speech until midnight.

> The disciples were gathered in an upper room.

> There were many lamps in the upper room.

Take the time to carefully think about these details. How should we treat them? How should they be applied today? Should they all be applied? If not, which ones should be applied, and how can we know? Here they are again. Which details continue to carry modern significance?

Romans 11:25-36 (ESV) 25 Lest you be wise in your own sight, I want you to understand this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And in this way all Israel will be saved, as it is written, “The Deliverer will come from Zion, he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”; 27 “and this will be my covenant with them when I take away their sins.” 28 As regards the gospel, they are enemies of God for your sake. But as regards election, they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers. 29 For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. 30 For just as you were at one time disobedient to God but now have received mercy because of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now been disobedient in order that by the mercy shown to you they also may now receive mercy. 32 For God has consigned all to disobedience, that he may have mercy on all. 33 Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! 34 “For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor?” 35 “Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?” 36 For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen.

How Should We Handle Tradition?

When the report of Jesus' miracles spread abroad, Pharisees and scribes from Jerusalem made their way north to the region of Galilee to confront Jesus. They charged that the Lord's disciples neglected to keep the "traditions" of the elders because they did not ceremonially wash their hands before they ate. But Jesus focused on the testers, asking "Why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?" (Matt 15.3).

This narrative highlights a problem that has troubled followers of Jesus for many centuries—how do we faithfully discern between "the commandments of God" and our own human traditions?

Key Terms Defined

"Commandment," in the context of Matthew 15, refers to that which has been delivered to mankind via divine revelation.

"For God commanded, 'Honor your father and your mother,' and, `Whoever reviles father or mother must surely die.' But you say, 'If anyone tells his father or his mother, "What you would have gained from me is given to God," he need not honor his father.' So for the sake of your tradition you have made void the word of God." (Matt 1 5.4-6)

Similar language is used in Luke 23.56, as Luke describes some of the female disciples at the tomb of Jesus.

Then they returned and prepared spices and ointments. On the Sabbath they rested according to the commandment.

When terms like commandment, law, or the word of God are used in Scripture, they most often

inherently represent an obligation that has been imposed by God himself under which human

beings are amenable. If I, or you, or anyone else violates those divine edicts, we are guilty of sin.

An "expedient" is an appropriate, profitable, advantageous way to accomplish something. Expedients are helpful means to necessary ends. The word expedient is used seven times in the King James Version of the Scriptures.

"Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die

for the people, and that the whole nation perish not." (John 11.50)

"Nevertheless I tell you the truth; it is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you." (John 16.7)

Now Caiaphas was he, which gave counsel to the Jews, that it was expedient that one man should die for the people. (John 18.14)

All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. (1 Cor 6.12)

All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. (1 Cor 10.23)

And herein I give my advice: for this is expedient for you, who have begun before, not only to do, but also to be forward a year ago. (2 Cor 8.10)

It is not expedient for me doubtless to glory. I will come to visions and revelations of the Lord. (2 Cor 12.1)

When God Hasn't Said Anything About It

Having focused extensively in previous lessons on the nature of God's specific and generic instructions, we turn our attention more fully to the other end of the spectrum. What about those innumerable instances when God hasn't said anything? How should we treat the silence of God? Is it permissive or prohibitive? When God hasn't specifically addressed something in either positive or negative terms, may we faithfully interpret his silence as license to proceed in whatever direction we choose?

Granted, we don't read anything in God's revelation to mankind about the yearly observance of Easter, but what's the big deal if we're remembering Jesus? The use of guitars, keyboards and drums in our corporate gatherings of worship can't be specifically authorized using the New Testament, but what's wrong with using them if our praise is enthusiastically directed toward God? May we build whatever we would like to build, fund whatever we would like to fund, solicit in whatever way we would like to solicit, as long as some justifiable good comes as a result of our efforts?

As human beings, we can formulate an endless amount of "good reasons." Given enough time and wiggle room, we can justify nearly anything. We can appeal to emotions and reason from past experiences and motivate with inspiring rhetoric, but we are not the ultimate standard of authority. The bedrock principles delivered in Isaiah 55.6-11 continue to resonate throughout the created order:

"Seek the LORD while he may be found;

call upon him while he is near; let the wicked forsake his way,

and the unrighteous man his thoughts;

let him return to the LORD, that he may have compassion on him,

and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon.

For my thoughts are not your thoughts,

neither are your ways my ways, declares the LORD.

For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.

"For as the rain and the snow come down from heaven

and do not return there but water the earth,

making it bring forth and sprout,

giving seed to the sower and bread to the eater, so shall my word be that goes out from my mouth;

it shall not return to me empty,

but it shall accomplish that which I purpose,

and shall succeed in the thing for which I sent it."

As human beings, we understand and apply authoritative instructions using everyday

common sense. We learn to do so from a very early age. We may not use distinctive labels or

philosophical definitions to describe what we’re doing, but we comprehend and follow the

fundamental principles of authority and compliance in thousands upon thousands of actions and

reactions over a lifetime of interaction.

For example, a father knocks on the bedroom door of his teenage son and communicates

clear instructions to him. “Take this $25 and go to Pizza Hut on Main Street. I just called in an

order for a sausage pizza, an order of breadsticks, and a Diet Coke. Go straight there, and come

straight back home. We’ll have the table set when you get back.” That teenager is now the

recipient of very specific instructions that carry the authoritative weight of his father. These

instructions, by their very nature, logically rule out millions of other variables.

< Can the teenage son take his father’s $25, pick up his girlfriend, and head for the movie

theater? No! Why not? His father specifically told him to go to Pizza Hut and spend the

money there. Even though his father did not methodically list every possible place his son

should not go, the teenager naturally understands something, doesn’t he? To take that

$25 and spend it anywhere other than Pizza Hut will be to disobey his father at home. His

father’s specific mention of Pizza Hut on Main Street logically rules out every other pizza

place, every other restaurant, every other venue, and even every other Pizza Hut other

than the Pizza Hut on Main Street.

Consider the foundation we’ve methodically laid thus far in our study. The goal has been

to start at basic “ground-level” and gradually build, one layer of understanding upon another.

< The Bible is the world’s most precious book.

< All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for those who invest in it.

< The old law of Moses served a vital role in God’s eternal plan, but on this historical side

of the cross, we live under the scope of the new covenant of Jesus Christ.

< There are two ultimate sources of authority—heavenly and human. As we handle the New

Testament, we’re interacting with heavenly authority.

< Based on my ongoing interaction with this heavenly authority, I will function either on the

side of “law” or “lawlessness.” I’m encouraged by the Spirit of God to speak and to act

as one who will be “judged under the law of liberty” (James 2.12).

< There are differing categories of Biblical communication whose context must be

appreciated if we are to “accurately handle the word of truth” (2 Tim 2.15).

But how, practically speaking, does the Bible direct us? In real-life terms, how do we transition

from reading God-breathed words on the printed pages of our Bibles to leading God-approved

lives in our own modern context? How can I faithfully interpret his communication to mankind

that was delivered thousands of years ago and faithfully apply it to my own individual life? How

does God speak to me and direct me at this point in history? Consider six “connective paths”

between the Word of God and the human heart.

If you've ever tried to buy or sell a house, you've probably heard the most popular mantra

in real estate: "Location, location, location." It simply means that identical houses can increase

or decrease in value due to their physical location. It's the number one rule in real estate, and

it's often the most overlooked.

The same sort of thing could be said about our efforts to interpret the Bible: "Location,

location, location." Or, another way of putting it is: "Context, context, context." Edwin Crozier

illustrates the principle by sharing the opening paragraph of a book entitled Murder at Cory

Mansion.

A few minutes of stillness lingered at the Cory Mansion, when the

night sounds were shattered by a woman's scream and an infant's

cry. A few minutes later, as the clock in the hall struck 2:30, a man

carrying a black leather handbag slipped quickly from the house,

glanced up and down the street, and walked briskly away through

the early morning mist.

What happened?