In this episode Camilla ter Haar and Ruth Keating discuss ‘Building for the Future – Climate Change and Arbitration’ with Jessica Crow. Jessica is an independent arbitrator (Arbitra International) who specialises in Energy and Natural Resources, Climate Change and the Environment, General Commercial Disputes and Public International Law, based out of London and Washington DC. She has particular expertise in matters relating to the energy transition and the international climate change regime. This episode focusses on the trends in climate change and arbitration – with a particular focus on what these trends mean for our construction sector clients.

In this episode Camilla ter Haar and Ruth Keating discuss ‘Building for the Future’ with Joana Setzer Assistant Professorial Research Fellow at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). This episode focusses on the trends in climate litigation and in particular what these trends mean for our construction sector clients.

In this episode Camilla ter Haar and Ruth Keating discuss ‘Contracting for the Climate’ with Becky Annison of the Chancery Lane Project. This episode discusses some of the Chancery Lane Project’s model clauses and tips for lawyers on how these clauses can be implemented in contracts. As discussed in the podcast – contracting for the climate is today’s issue, not tomorrow’s problem.

In the third and final part of this this three-part mini series Joe-han Ho, Ruth Keating and Philippe Kuhn discuss the implications of the Witness Evidence Working Group’s proposals and how they might, or might not, work in practice. This part also provides 10 must-know points on the proposed reforms.

In the second part of this three-part mini series, Joe-han Ho, Ruth Keating and Philippe Kuhn discuss the scope of the proposed reforms put forward by the Witness Evidence Working Group in draft Practice Direction 57AC and accompanying statement of best practice. Major reform proposals include: (i) Certificates of Compliance; (ii) listing of documents seen by the witness; and (iii) providing detailed descriptions of the process.

In the first part of this three-part mini series, Joe-han Ho, Ruth Keating and Philippe Kuhn, commercial barristers at 39 Essex Chambers, discuss the issues which have arisen in the preparation of trial witness statements which have led to the proposed reforms in draft Practice Direction 57AC. This episode sets the backdrop for the problems which have arisen in practice and which have built to the proposals put forward by the Witness Evidence Working Group.

In this episode John Denis-Smith, David Sawtell and Rebecca Drake consider the recent judgment of Mrs Justice Cockerill in Rochford v Kilhan. The judgment in this part 8 claim in the TCC held that under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the “Act”) the final date for payment must be a fixed period of time from the due date, and cannot be linked to the provision of invoices.

Even if summary judgment is granted, the insolvent company might find that a stay of execution is granted. This episode will explore the court’s jurisdiction to stay execution of the Judgment and the criteria it will apply.

Many of the recent cases involving insolvent companies have involved litigation funding. This episode will explore the issues of ATE insurance, champerty and litigation funding.

A number of TCC decisions have set out conditions that the insolvent company will have to meet before it summary judgment is granted for enforcement, such as ring-fencing the adjudicated sum. This episode looks at what the TCC will expect to see.