Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media

Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media

Download on the App Store

Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media episodes

  • 98: Why Saving Democracy Sounds Like a Threat to Conservatives – Scott Warren and Sophia Winner

    When pro-democracy advocates talk about "protecting institutions" or "preserving democratic norms," why does that message so often fall flat in conservative communities?

    In this episode, we sit down with researchers Scott Warren (Lab Director and SNF Agora Fellow) and Sophia Winner (Research Program Coordinator) from the SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University. They discuss a deep ethnographic study that explores how conservative Americans actually perceive democratic institutions, state legitimacy, and political trust. 

    Instead of relying on standard polling or quick focus groups, this research involved multi-hour interviews with participants across rural Wyoming, suburban South Carolina, and Ottawa County, Michigan. The findings reveal a crucial disconnect: while mainstream messaging focuses heavily on procedural norms, conservative trust originates at a much deeper level—the moral foundation. 

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    31 min
  • 97. Is Academic Research Compromising Its Own Standards – Ashley Rubin

    Are political considerations, ideological conformity, and fear of backlash compromising scholarly standards in higher education? 

    When public trust in knowledge-producing institutions breaks down, arriving at a shared baseline of facts becomes nearly impossible. In this episode, we speak with Dr. Ashley Rubin, Professor of Sociology at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, about her work on a multi-university commission investigating politicization across academic disciplines. 

    Dr. Rubin brings an empirical, diagnostic lens to the debate, breaking down the systemic pressures inside higher education—from self-censorship and peer review challenges to the decline of traditional objectivity.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    34 min
  • Spotlight Series: Decoding Democratic Socialism vs. Social Democracy

    Are you confused by the constant mix-up of political terms in modern headlines? Is Sweden socialist? What does the DSA actually want? Are Social Democrats and Democratic Socialists the same thing?

    In this episode, we break down the major ideological definitions, clear up the common misunderstandings, and explain what separates welfare-state capitalism from true democratic control of the economy.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    32 min
  • 96. Navigating Uncertainty: The Philosophy of Orientation - Douglas Giles

    When the world feels overwhelmingly complex, outrage becomes an easy shortcut. It offers an instant—if temporary—feeling of certainty, control, and moral superiority. But what if our explosive reactions to political and social differences aren't just about the issues themselves, but about how we orient ourselves amid uncertainty?

    In this episode, David sits down with philosopher and educator Dr. Douglas Giles to explore the philosophy of orientation—a practical diagnostic lens for understanding how we make sense of our environment, construct identity, and navigate interpersonal conflict.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    38 min
  • BONUS - How to Persuade People Who Disagree With You (Hint: It’s Not Facts) - Karin Tamerius
    How to Have Better Political Conversations (Even with Your Most Difficult Relatives)


    In this episode of Outrage Overload, host David Beckemeyer sits down with Dr. Karin Tamerius, a political psychiatrist and founder of Smart Politics, a nonprofit that helps progressives communicate persuasively while maintaining respect for differing viewpoints. They discuss how political polarization affects both sides of the spectrum, with a focus on how it may impact progressives more deeply. Dr. Tamerius shares her science-based strategies for fostering healthier political dialogue, building connections, and persuading without imposing beliefs. They also dive into the concept of the "Angry Uncle" and how to navigate those tough, emotionally charged conversations. Whether you're progressive, conservative, or somewhere in between, this episode offers valuable insights on creating productive, respectful conversations in a divided world. Tune in to explore how we can all lower the temperature in political discussions and communicate more effectively across divides.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    31 min
  • 95. The Legal Glitch That Engineered Our Political Rage – Larry Lessig

    Why Overturning Citizens United Isn't the Only Way to Stop Super PACs

    Host David Beckemeyer speaks with Larry Lessig, the Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership at Harvard Law School. Together, they unpack the hidden legal architecture driving our hyper-polarized landscape and explore why fixing the structural money in politics is a necessary first step toward reining in the outrage machine. 

    While the popular narrative blames Citizens United for making unlimited campaign money unstoppable, Lessig reveals that super PACs actually rest on a flawed lower-court decision—SpeechNow.org v. FEC—that conflated independent spending with unlimited contributions. He explains how a voter-approved initiative in Maine capping super PAC contributions at $5,000 is setting up a targeted legal challenge at the Supreme Court that could dismantle super PACs without needing a constitutional amendment.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    49 min
  • 94. Making Politicians Accountable to Voters – Ramon Perez

    Reimagining Democracy: Using AI and Mobile Tech to Break the Outrage Machine

    Congress currently sits at a near-record low approval rating, yet individual lawmakers are reelected over 90% of the time. Why is our political system so resistant to public accountability? 

    In this episode, David Beckemeyer sits down with Ramon Perez, Executive Director of the Digital Democracy Project, to unpack the structural incentives that keep our political system locked in hyper-partisanship and outrage. 

    Rather than offering soft "be nicer" solutions, Ramon outlines a direct, technology-driven counter-maneuver: leveraging secure mobile platforms and artificial intelligence to bypass political middlemen, translate complex legalese into plain text, and hold representatives directly accountable to their constituents. 

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    29 min
  • Civic Voices: What Occupy Taught Us About Grassroots Power - Mila Atmos

    When a public movement erupts, media attention almost immediately centers on the spectacle—the street confrontations, the viral headlines, and the rapid-fire political commentary. But once the news cycle moves on, we rarely stop to analyze how the information ecosystem shaped what we saw, or what actually happens to that momentum after the cameras leave. 

    In this special episode of Outrage Overload, we sit down with Mila Atmos, host of the Future Hindsight podcast. Together, we revisit the 2011 Occupy Wall Street movement—operating right on the precipice of algorithm-driven social media—to explore how movement-building, media coverage, and police reactions shaped public trust, and what today’s exhausted majority can learn about driving real, long-term civic action. 

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    28 min
  • 93. The Structural Battle for the DOJ – Alex Lovit

    In February 2025, we explored how an expanding executive branch was stretching traditional boundaries. In this follow-up episode, we turn our attention to the primary institutional battleground of 2026: The Department of Justice (DOJ).

    The long-standing post-Watergate norm that the DOJ should operate independently from presidential control has been explicitly rejected by the current administration. Asserting total constitutional authority over all executive branch agencies under Article II, the administration argues that an independent DOJ is a constitutional myth.

    To break down the structural reality behind the headlines—including the rapid dismissal of indictments against political allies, the targeting of opponents, and mass civil service purges—we sit down with historian Alex Lovit, host of The Context (a sister podcast in The Democracy Group network). Together, we place the crisis of 2026 into historical perspective, tracing the design flaws and structural vulnerabilities of the DOJ from its founding in 1870 to the present day.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    52 min
  • 92. Breaking the Duopoly Loop – Nathan Smolensky

    Are we really trapped in a permanent political doom loop, or is the two-party duopoly actually more vulnerable than it looks? 

    We often look at heavily gerrymandered, "safe" districts and hyper-partisan outrage and assume nothing can change until we get massive, far-off structural reform. But what if the major parties have aggressively optimized the system for a zero-sum, two-player game—and that very optimization has left them completely exposed to independent challenges? 

    This week, David sits down with political campaign consultant Nathan Smolensky to break down the raw, data-driven mechanics of the independent landscape. Looking past the national presidential spectacle, Nathan explains why local and state races are a completely different playground for independent success, how candidates can flip the "spoiler effect" narrative on its head, and how scalable new campaign technologies are dismantling the traditional fundraising barrier to entry.

    Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David

    Support the show

    Show Notes:
    https://outrageoverload.net/

    Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com

    HOTLINE: 925-552-7885

    Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode

    If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.

    Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload

    Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.

    Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.

    Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.

    Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...

    30 min

About Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media

From the publisher's feed

If politics and media leave you feeling angry, overwhelmed, or exhausted, Outrage Overload is for you.


In about 30 minutes every few weeks, we explore how outrage spreads, how…

More shows like Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media

Political Gabfest by Slate Podcasts

Political Gabfest

8,440 Listeners

Today, Explained by Vox

Today, Explained

10,269 Listeners