
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When pro-democracy advocates talk about "protecting institutions" or "preserving democratic norms," why does that message so often fall flat in conservative communities?
In this episode, we sit down with researchers Scott Warren (Lab Director and SNF Agora Fellow) and Sophia Winner (Research Program Coordinator) from the SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University. They discuss a deep ethnographic study that explores how conservative Americans actually perceive democratic institutions, state legitimacy, and political trust.
Instead of relying on standard polling or quick focus groups, this research involved multi-hour interviews with participants across rural Wyoming, suburban South Carolina, and Ottawa County, Michigan. The findings reveal a crucial disconnect: while mainstream messaging focuses heavily on procedural norms, conservative trust originates at a much deeper level—the moral foundation.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
Are political considerations, ideological conformity, and fear of backlash compromising scholarly standards in higher education?
When public trust in knowledge-producing institutions breaks down, arriving at a shared baseline of facts becomes nearly impossible. In this episode, we speak with Dr. Ashley Rubin, Professor of Sociology at the University of Hawaii at Mānoa, about her work on a multi-university commission investigating politicization across academic disciplines.
Dr. Rubin brings an empirical, diagnostic lens to the debate, breaking down the systemic pressures inside higher education—from self-censorship and peer review challenges to the decline of traditional objectivity.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
Are you confused by the constant mix-up of political terms in modern headlines? Is Sweden socialist? What does the DSA actually want? Are Social Democrats and Democratic Socialists the same thing?
In this episode, we break down the major ideological definitions, clear up the common misunderstandings, and explain what separates welfare-state capitalism from true democratic control of the economy.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
When the world feels overwhelmingly complex, outrage becomes an easy shortcut. It offers an instant—if temporary—feeling of certainty, control, and moral superiority. But what if our explosive reactions to political and social differences aren't just about the issues themselves, but about how we orient ourselves amid uncertainty?
In this episode, David sits down with philosopher and educator Dr. Douglas Giles to explore the philosophy of orientation—a practical diagnostic lens for understanding how we make sense of our environment, construct identity, and navigate interpersonal conflict.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
In this episode of Outrage Overload, host David Beckemeyer sits down with Dr. Karin Tamerius, a political psychiatrist and founder of Smart Politics, a nonprofit that helps progressives communicate persuasively while maintaining respect for differing viewpoints. They discuss how political polarization affects both sides of the spectrum, with a focus on how it may impact progressives more deeply. Dr. Tamerius shares her science-based strategies for fostering healthier political dialogue, building connections, and persuading without imposing beliefs. They also dive into the concept of the "Angry Uncle" and how to navigate those tough, emotionally charged conversations. Whether you're progressive, conservative, or somewhere in between, this episode offers valuable insights on creating productive, respectful conversations in a divided world. Tune in to explore how we can all lower the temperature in political discussions and communicate more effectively across divides.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
Why Overturning Citizens United Isn't the Only Way to Stop Super PACs
Host David Beckemeyer speaks with Larry Lessig, the Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership at Harvard Law School. Together, they unpack the hidden legal architecture driving our hyper-polarized landscape and explore why fixing the structural money in politics is a necessary first step toward reining in the outrage machine.
While the popular narrative blames Citizens United for making unlimited campaign money unstoppable, Lessig reveals that super PACs actually rest on a flawed lower-court decision—SpeechNow.org v. FEC—that conflated independent spending with unlimited contributions. He explains how a voter-approved initiative in Maine capping super PAC contributions at $5,000 is setting up a targeted legal challenge at the Supreme Court that could dismantle super PACs without needing a constitutional amendment.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
Reimagining Democracy: Using AI and Mobile Tech to Break the Outrage Machine
Congress currently sits at a near-record low approval rating, yet individual lawmakers are reelected over 90% of the time. Why is our political system so resistant to public accountability?
In this episode, David Beckemeyer sits down with Ramon Perez, Executive Director of the Digital Democracy Project, to unpack the structural incentives that keep our political system locked in hyper-partisanship and outrage.
Rather than offering soft "be nicer" solutions, Ramon outlines a direct, technology-driven counter-maneuver: leveraging secure mobile platforms and artificial intelligence to bypass political middlemen, translate complex legalese into plain text, and hold representatives directly accountable to their constituents.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
When a public movement erupts, media attention almost immediately centers on the spectacle—the street confrontations, the viral headlines, and the rapid-fire political commentary. But once the news cycle moves on, we rarely stop to analyze how the information ecosystem shaped what we saw, or what actually happens to that momentum after the cameras leave.
In this special episode of Outrage Overload, we sit down with Mila Atmos, host of the Future Hindsight podcast. Together, we revisit the 2011 Occupy Wall Street movement—operating right on the precipice of algorithm-driven social media—to explore how movement-building, media coverage, and police reactions shaped public trust, and what today’s exhausted majority can learn about driving real, long-term civic action.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
In February 2025, we explored how an expanding executive branch was stretching traditional boundaries. In this follow-up episode, we turn our attention to the primary institutional battleground of 2026: The Department of Justice (DOJ).
The long-standing post-Watergate norm that the DOJ should operate independently from presidential control has been explicitly rejected by the current administration. Asserting total constitutional authority over all executive branch agencies under Article II, the administration argues that an independent DOJ is a constitutional myth.
To break down the structural reality behind the headlines—including the rapid dismissal of indictments against political allies, the targeting of opponents, and mass civil service purges—we sit down with historian Alex Lovit, host of The Context (a sister podcast in The Democracy Group network). Together, we place the crisis of 2026 into historical perspective, tracing the design flaws and structural vulnerabilities of the DOJ from its founding in 1870 to the present day.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
Are we really trapped in a permanent political doom loop, or is the two-party duopoly actually more vulnerable than it looks?
We often look at heavily gerrymandered, "safe" districts and hyper-partisan outrage and assume nothing can change until we get massive, far-off structural reform. But what if the major parties have aggressively optimized the system for a zero-sum, two-player game—and that very optimization has left them completely exposed to independent challenges?
This week, David sits down with political campaign consultant Nathan Smolensky to break down the raw, data-driven mechanics of the independent landscape. Looking past the national presidential spectacle, Nathan explains why local and state races are a completely different playground for independent success, how candidates can flip the "spoiler effect" narrative on its head, and how scalable new campaign technologies are dismantling the traditional fundraising barrier to entry.
Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David
Support the show
Show Notes:
https://outrageoverload.net/
Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email [email protected]. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com
HOTLINE: 925-552-7885
Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode
If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it.
Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload
Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites.
Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C.
Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen.
Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
From the publisher's feed
If politics and media leave you feeling angry, overwhelmed, or exhausted, Outrage Overload is for you.
In about 30 minutes every few weeks, we explore how outrage spreads, how…
Through conversations with leading scientists, researchers, and authors, we unpack the psychology, incentives, and systems shaping today’s political climate — and offer practical tools to think clearly, stay grounded, and respond constructively.
Outrage Overload helps listeners with critical questions about outrage culture, political polarization, misinformation, and media manipulation—offering science-based insight, expert interviews, and practical tools to stay grounded in a divided world.
If you’ve ever asked yourself…
• How can I stay politically informed without feeling outraged or exhausted all the time?
• Why is political polarization getting worse, and what can we do about it?
• What exactly is outrage culture, and how does it manipulate us?
• How do I talk about politics without it turning into a fight?
• Am I being misled by the media? How can I tell?
• What’s the psychological toll of living in an outrage-driven media environment?
• How can I build critical thinking skills to make sense of today’s news?
• What role does social media play in fueling outrage and misinformation?
• Is it possible to care about politics without losing your mind?
• What practical tools or insights can help me deal with toxic politics and media?
…then this is the politics show you didn’t know you needed.
Most media is designed to hijack your biology. They have the tactics, but they lack a worldview that respects your intelligence. Outrage Overload uses the tools of modern technology not to capture your attention, but to return it to you. We aren't here to 'fix the algorithm'; we're here to help you outgrow it.
Join host David Beckemeyer—science communicator and founding CTO of EarthLink—as he explores the mechanics of outrage, speaks with experts in psychology, media, and political science, and equips listeners with strategies for navigating today’s high-conflict culture with emotional resilience, critical thinking, and civil discourse.

8,440 Listeners

10,269 Listeners