Show Notes: Patterns in the Chaos

Don't be a Victim

May 2, 2025

Show Notes: Patterns in the Chaos

Overview

This week’s newsletter “Patterns in the Chaos” explores how individuals and organizations can move from passive observers to active agents of change. In an era defined by conflicting signals—tech giants under legal fire, explosive AI adoption, and lofty visions of abundance—the key is to identify cross-cutting patterns and choose which future you want to build.

Our content spans court battles over monopolies, the rise of agentic AI in enterprises, evolving capital markets, debates over human value in an automated world, and strategic adaptation in turbulent times. Listeners will gain insights into how these forces interconnect and shape the next chapter of technology, policy, and society.

Key Trend 1: The Rise of Agentic AI in Enterprise

Significance: AI is shifting from a research topic to a mission-critical operational layer. Organizations are embedding autonomous software agents into R&D, go-to-market, and everyday workflows.

Talking Point 1: Widespread Agentic AI Adoption

Talking Point 1: Nine in ten R&D teams plan to implement agentic AI this year, signaling a transition from experimentation to production.

“91% of R&D Respondents have implemented or are planning to implement agentic AI” (David Poole, Georgian & NewtonX – https://georgian.io/agentic-ai-adoption-insights-from-600-executives/)

This momentum underscores that AI planning, reasoning, and execution capabilities are now viewed as essential for competitive R&D.

Talking Point 2: Re-Architecting Infrastructure for Agents

Talking Point 2: Companies are considering the web browser as the next OS-level platform for AI agents.

“We need to build an OS-level agent, and a browser is essentially a containerized operating system” (Aravind Srinivas, on Spyglass – https://spyglass.org/ai-web-browser/)

To avoid catastrophic misinterpretations, teams must also cultivate robust semantic layers that feed agents the context they lack.

“Teams will become cultivators of a constantly evolving collection of cross-domain semantic layers” (Tom Tunguz – https://www.tomtunguz.com/semantic-layer/)

Key Trend 2: Monopoly, Regulation, and the Future of Tech Power

Significance: High-stakes antitrust actions against Apple and Google are not just about market share today but about control over tomorrow’s AI and distribution channels.

Talking Point 1: Google’s Default Search Under Scrutiny

Talking Point 1: The Justice Department warns that Google's exclusive search deals could “supercharge” its AI rollout and foreclose competition.

“Default placement … could be leveraged to ‘supercharge’ new AI offerings, ensuring consumers turn first to Google” (David McCabe, NYT – https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/technology/google-antitrust-trial-ai.html)

Regulators argue that data-fuel advantages from search defaults give Google an unfair head start in AI services.

Talking Point 2: Apple’s App Store Defiance

Talking Point 2: A federal judge referred Apple to criminal prosecutors for ignoring a 2021 injunction on App Store anti-steering rules.

“Apple’s goal: to dissuade customer usage of alternative purchase opportunities and maintain its anticompetitive revenue stream” (John Gruber, Daring Fireball – https://daringfireball.net/2025/04/gonzales_rogers_apple_app_store_ruling)

This decision forces platforms to reassess how they enforce fees and policies, with potential global ripples.

Key Trend 3: Capital Markets Evolution—New Funding Paths and VC Models

Significance: Funding mechanisms are diversifying—SPACs are back, VC firms are retooling their partnership models, and founders must navigate changing incentives at each stage.

Talking Point 1: SPACs Make a Comeback

Talking Point 1: After a rocky 2021, blank-check companies are targeting sectors from autonomous trucking to nuclear power.

“Kodiak Robotics announced a SPAC merger at a pre-money valuation around $2.5 billion” (Joanna Glasner, Crunchbase – https://news.crunchbase.com/public/spac/tariffs-ai-robotics-crypto-biotech/)

Startups see SPACs as a viable alternative to traditional IPOs, attracting capital at scale.

Talking Point 2: VC as a “Full-Stack” Support Platform

Talking Point 2: Andreessen Horowitz redefined venture capital by building specialized teams (talent, marketing, regulatory) around each investment.

“Founders deserve more than just capital, but a comprehensive, long-term support system” (a16z – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpBDB2NjaWY)

This contrasts with multi-stage funds whose “pipeline” approach can inflate early valuations without seed-stage expertise (Taavet Hinrikus, 20VC – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvHnRxKdg2M).

Key Trend 4: Human Agency, Abundance, and the Value of People

Significance: As automation and AI proliferate, human skills, relationships, and democratic participation become scarce—and thus, strategic—assets.

Talking Point 1: From Scarcity to Abundance Requires Purposeful Policy

Talking Point 1: Ezra Klein’s “Abundance” review criticizes timid calls for incremental reform and urges a democratic blueprint for real abundance.

“This is the real discussion we need to be having: how can we achieve the disruptive level of change required for an actual abundance agenda in a democratic fashion.” (Albert Wenger – https://paragraph.com/@continuations/abundance-book-review)

Bold policy and collective agency are essential to realize unlimited access to what humans need.

Talking Point 2: Human Interaction as a Luxury in the Digital Era

Talking Point 2: AI companions and curated human engagement are emerging as valuable services for the socially isolated.

“New technologies often feel dystopian, until they feel commonplace … AI friends are a good thing, actually.” (Rex Woodbury – https://www.digitalnative.tech/p/ai-friends-are-a-good-thing-actually)

“Human engagement is often reserved for those who can afford it, leading to a society where personal attention is a luxury.” (Humans As Luxury Goods – https://platforms.substack.com/p/humans-as-luxury-goods-in-the-age)

Key Trend 5: Strategic Adaptation Amidst Chaos

Significance: Periods of upheaval create openings for startups and organizations that can navigate uncertainty, discipline pilots toward production, and rethink industrial strategy.

Talking Point 1: Chaos as a Catalyst for Creative Destruction

Talking Point 1: Startups thrive as “tricksters” in turbulent times, deploying architectural innovation to topple incumbents.

“Periods of upheaval … create opportunities for startups to disrupt entrenched incumbents.”(Packy McCormick – https://www.notboring.co/p/chaos-is-a-ladder)

Embracing uncertainty can be a deliberate strategy for reinvention.

Talking Point 2: Overcoming “Death by 1,000 Pilots”

Talking Point 2: The real challenge is not launching PoCs but scaling them into production with robust infrastructure, monitoring, and operations.

“It’s easy to fire up a pilot … you can get stuck in this ‘death by 1,000 pilots’ approach.” (Rodney Zemmel, McKinsey Digital, via O’Reilly – https://www.oreilly.com/radar/death-by-1000-pilots/)

Companies must build clear paths from experimentation to value realization.

Discussion Questions

How can enterprises avoid “death by 1,000 pilots” while rapidly scaling agentic AI capabilities?

What are the trade-offs between antitrust interventions (e.g., breaking up defaults) and the risk of stifling AI innovation?

In a world where human interaction becomes a luxury, how should companies balance automation with services that emphasize personal touch?

Can SPACs and “full-stack” VC platforms coexist, or will one model dominate early-stage funding in the next cycle?

Given the tension between incremental regulatory fixes and calls for disruptive abundance agendas, what level of policy boldness is both feasible and desirable?

How might a forced sale of a browser or default search slot reshape the competitive dynamics of AI distribution? (Controversy: divestiture as remedy)

Are hyper-optimistic growth projections (e.g., OpenAI’s $129 billion by 2029) fantasy, or do they play a functional role in mobilizing capital? (Controversy: realism vs. hype)

Closing Segment

Across regulation, capital, technology and human value, one pattern emerges: agency matters. Whether you’re a founder, policy-maker, or individual, inertial forces abound—but so do levers for change. Embracing agentic AI, reshaping capital structures, demanding bold policy, and elevating human skills can turn chaos into opportunity. As we close, remember: “History is decided by human decisions taken in real time.” What decision will you make today to shape tomorrow?

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.thatwastheweek.com/subscribe