
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yesterday we learned that the apostle Paul treated Genesis as literal history and as foundational to the gospel. Well, the apostle Peter did too!
In his letters he refers to the flood of Noah’s day as a historical event and that only eight people were saved. He even ties that past event to the second coming of Christ. He says that scoffers will deny Christ’s second coming because they also deny God’s supernatural creation of the universe and Noah’s flood.
The biblical authors took Genesis literally and we should too! After all, that’s how the text naturally reads . . . as a real historical narrative, well, from the very first verse.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
Yesterday we learned that the apostle Paul treated Genesis as literal history and as foundational to the gospel. Well, the apostle Peter did too!
In his letters he refers to the flood of Noah’s day as a historical event and that only eight people were saved. He even ties that past event to the second coming of Christ. He says that scoffers will deny Christ’s second coming because they also deny God’s supernatural creation of the universe and Noah’s flood.
The biblical authors took Genesis literally and we should too! After all, that’s how the text naturally reads . . . as a real historical narrative, well, from the very first verse.

5,212 Listeners

2,712 Listeners

1,516 Listeners

161 Listeners

1,012 Listeners

3,130 Listeners

2,854 Listeners

5,369 Listeners

5,329 Listeners

1,532 Listeners

2,466 Listeners

948 Listeners

387 Listeners

2,903 Listeners

13,096 Listeners