
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yesterday we learned that the apostle Paul treated Genesis as literal history and as foundational to the gospel. Well, the apostle Peter did too!
In his letters he refers to the flood of Noah’s day as a historical event and that only eight people were saved. He even ties that past event to the second coming of Christ. He says that scoffers will deny Christ’s second coming because they also deny God’s supernatural creation of the universe and Noah’s flood.
The biblical authors took Genesis literally and we should too! After all, that’s how the text naturally reads . . . as a real historical narrative, well, from the very first verse.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
Yesterday we learned that the apostle Paul treated Genesis as literal history and as foundational to the gospel. Well, the apostle Peter did too!
In his letters he refers to the flood of Noah’s day as a historical event and that only eight people were saved. He even ties that past event to the second coming of Christ. He says that scoffers will deny Christ’s second coming because they also deny God’s supernatural creation of the universe and Noah’s flood.
The biblical authors took Genesis literally and we should too! After all, that’s how the text naturally reads . . . as a real historical narrative, well, from the very first verse.

5,211 Listeners

2,598 Listeners

1,518 Listeners

175 Listeners

1,038 Listeners

3,156 Listeners

2,887 Listeners

5,464 Listeners

5,373 Listeners

1,547 Listeners

2,488 Listeners

953 Listeners

386 Listeners

2,928 Listeners

13,245 Listeners