SCOTUScast

Peter v. NantKwest Inc. - Post Argument SCOTUScast


Listen Later

On October 7, 2019, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Peter v. NantKwest Inc., a case which considers whether a party opting to bring a challenge in federal district court to an adverse decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (PTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) must pay the PTO’s resulting attorney’s fees.
When a patent application is rejected by the PTO, and the PTAB affirms that decision on appeal, the aggrieved applicant may either pursue further (but relatively constrained) review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit--or the applicant may file a more expansive challenge in federal district court. The latter option is authorized by 35 U.S.C. § 145, but the statute also provides that “[a]ll the expenses of the proceedings shall be paid by the applicant.”
Here, NantKwest challenged an adverse PTAB decision in federal district court, but lost. After the judgment was affirmed by the Federal Circuit, the PTO sought reimbursement of its expenses from NantKwest, including nearly $80,000 in attorneys’ fees. The district court denied recovery based on the “American Rule” that parties in federal court typically bear their own fees unless otherwise directed by Congress. A divided en banc panel of the Federal Circuit ultimately affirmed the district court. This decision, however, was in tension with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s construction of similar language in the Lanham Act.
Thereafter, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider whether the phrase “[a]ll the expenses of the proceedings” in 35 U.S.C. § 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the PTO incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation.
To discuss the case, we have Robert J. Rando, Founder and Lead Counsel, The Rando Law Firm P.C.*
*Please note that Mr. Rando is co-Counsel on an Amicus brief filed on behalf of the Association of Amicus Counsel in this case.
As always, the Federalist Society takes no particular legal or public policy positions. All opinions expressed are those of the speakers.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

SCOTUScastBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

4.5

106 ratings


More shows like SCOTUScast

View all
WSJ What’s News by The Wall Street Journal

WSJ What’s News

4,330 Listeners

FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

Bloomberg Law by Bloomberg

Bloomberg Law

356 Listeners

FedSoc Forums by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Forums

82 Listeners

The Glenn Show by Glenn Loury

The Glenn Show

2,255 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by Ricochet

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

676 Listeners

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch by Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal

WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch

2,792 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

677 Listeners

The Editors by National Review

The Editors

4,783 Listeners

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast by The Federalist Society

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

28 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

Uncommon Knowledge by Hoover Institution

Uncommon Knowledge

1,977 Listeners

Strict Scrutiny by Crooked Media

Strict Scrutiny

5,582 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,756 Listeners

The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

The Ezra Klein Show

15,281 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

372 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

666 Listeners

Honestly with Bari Weiss by The Free Press

Honestly with Bari Weiss

8,562 Listeners