Podcast – Houstonius

Podcast – Houstonius

By Lester LangdonBusinessInvesting
Download on the App Store

Podcast – Houstonius episodes

  • Gov. Abbott signs Squatter Legislation

    Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed two key anti-squatting laws passed by the Texas Legislature: Senate Bill 38 and Senate Bill 1333. These measures aim to close legal loopholes, accelerate property recovery for owners, and eliminate long civil court delays when removing unauthorized occupants.

    Key Anti-Squatting Bills

    1. Senate Bill 1333 (Immediate Removal & Penalties)

    • Law Enforcement Intervention: Empowers sheriffs and constables to remove squatters directly upon receiving a sworn complaint from a property owner stating that an unauthorized person has taken unlawful possession.
    • No Civil Delay: Property owners no longer have to wait through multi-month eviction processes if the occupant was never a legal tenant or leaseholder.
    • Targeting Lease Fraud: Upgrades criminal penalties for creating or presenting false lease documents, deeds, or fraudulent authorization.
    • Real Estate Scams: Makes it a felony to market, list, or accept payment for renting/selling real estate without legal ownership or clear authorization.
    • 2. Senate Bill 38 (Eviction Streamlining)

      • Strict Timelines: Sets uniform requirements requiring courts to hold eviction proceedings within 21 days of a petition being filed.
      • Summary Judgment: Allows courts to expedite cases via summary judgment when facts regarding tenancy status are undisputed, reducing court backlogs.
      • Summary of Impact

        Aspect
        Old Standard
        New Anti-Squatting Framework
        Law Enforcement Role
        Civil matter; police often refused to act without court eviction order.
        Officers can directly remove squatters upon receiving a sworn affidavit.
        Eviction Timeline
        Months of judicial delay.
        Fast-tracked trial within 21 days or immediate police removal for non-tenants.
        Fake Lease Scams
        Treated as basic civil dispute or low-level misdemeanor.
        Upgraded criminal penalties, including felonies for selling or leasing property without authority.

        7 min
      • A Serial Squatter Gets Sentenced to 20 Years in Texas

        A

        by Lauren Wellbank

        Tue, September 8, 2026 at 7:00 AM CDT

        Image Credit: New York Post / Facebook.

        Key takeaways – Powered by Yahoo Scout. Yahoo is using AI to generate key points from this article. This means the info may not always match what’s in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.

        • Heather Ruybal, a Texas woman, was convicted of felony fraud for squatting in multiple properties and causing thousands of dollars in damages.
        • Heather Ruybal finally found out her fate when she stood before a judge on Aug. 31, 2026. The Texas woman had been charged with felony fraud as a nearly lifelong squatter, racking up dozens of evictions and thousands of dollars’ worth of property damage over the years.

          According to the New York Post, it all came to a head in July when she was found guilty of the crimes, which stemmed from a 2023 incident where she wrote a bad check and used a fake name to lease a house. The judge was also able to take a 2018 conviction into consideration during sentencing, which led to much harsher punishment.

          In the end, Ruybal was hit with the maximum sentence, as well as a hefty restitution payment, which adds up to tens of thousands of dollars.

          Whether that feels like justice to the couple Ruybal was convicted of defrauding remains to be seen, especially considering everything they lost as a result of her crimes.

          Convicted Squatter Lived Rent-Free at Landlord’s Expense

          The Texas woman was convicted of renting a home from Jessica Davis under her late father Rayes Ruybal’s name. According to the New York Post, once she moved in, the squatter never made a payment to Davis, living in the home for free for several months. 

          Once Davis was finally able to get her out of the property, she was left with a massive cleanup on her hands. “Both of the toilets are clogged with mounds of toilet paper and other seemingly fluids,” Davis told Fox News back in 2023. Sadly, Davis eventually lost the home after being unable to make the payments due to a lack of rental income.

          The judge was able to use this story, as well as previous convictions across Texas and Denver, to enhance the sentencing. 

          The Squatter Was Accused of Other Offenses Over the Years

          It may be bad enough that Davis lost her home as a result of the lack of rental payments, but other former landlords have said that they were left with expensive cleanouts after dealing with the squatter as well. That includes a Colorado landlord who told Denver7 that her property was contaminated with methamphetamine after the squatter lived in her home back in 2024.

          She is also accused of stealing more than $500,000 from her former employer in her role as a bookkeeper and payroll manager, according to the outlet. 

          All States Have Some Sort of Squatters’ Rights

          According to the American Apartment Owners Association, squatters’ rights (aka adverse possession) laws exist in every state. Unfortunately, stories like the one Davis shared are becoming more common, highlighting the importance of laws like this. 

          0 min
        • HUD New ESA Memorandum

          What are the key changes in the HUD memorandum?

          According to the provided sources, the HUD memorandum issued on May 22 introduces several shifts in how assistance animal accommodation requests are handled, even though the core legal framework remains the same.

          The key changes highlighted in the memorandum include:

          • HUD Enforcement Interpretation: There is a change in how HUD interprets the enforcement of existing regulations.
          • Internal Complaint Processing: The memorandum affects the internal procedures for how complaints regarding assistance animals are processed.
          • Focus on Training and Tasks: There is new discussion and guidance regarding the training and specific tasks that assistance animals perform.
          • Shift in Guidance Reliance: The 2025–2026 period is characterized by “Policy Uncertainty,” including reports of guidance withdrawal and a reduced reliance on prior notices, such as the FHEO-2020-01. This has led to increased legal variability for housing providers.
          • What Has Not Changed

            It is important to note that the memorandum does not change the underlying law. The following elements remain stable:

            • The Fair Housing Act (FHA): The Act itself has not changed.
            • Reasonable Accommodation Framework: The basic legal structure for requesting and granting accommodations is still in place.
            • Disability Protections: Existing protections for individuals with disabilities remain the same.
            • Case-by-Case Evaluations: Housing providers are still required to evaluate each request on its own individual merits.
            • In summary, while the legal protections for persons with disabilities remain intact, the operational interpretation and enforcement strategies used by HUD are the primary areas of change.

              What is the impact of training and tasks guidance?

              The guidance regarding training and tasks represents a significant shift in HUD’s enforcement interpretation and is a primary driver of the current period of “Policy Uncertainty” (2025–2026) for housing providers.

              Based on the sources, the impact of this new guidance includes:

              • Shift in Enforcement Interpretation: The memorandum introduces new discussions specifically centered on the training and tasks assistance animals perform, which is marked as a key departure from previous internal processing.
              • Increased Legal Variability: Because HUD is reporting the withdrawal of certain guidance and a reduced reliance on prior notices (such as FHEO-2020-01), housing providers face more legal variability when determining how to evaluate the necessity of an animal’s specific tasks.
              • Operational Risk: This shift contributes to a move away from the “Operational Standard” held between 2020 and 2024, where verification protocols were more clearly defined by HUD guidance. Now, the interpretation of these requirements is changing, making consistent and defensible documentation of decisions even more critical for rental housing teams.
              • While these discussions around training and tasks are changing HUD’s interpretation, the sources emphasize that the Fair Housing Act (FHA) itself remains stable, and the requirement for case-by-case evaluations has not changed.

                What documentation can be required from applicants under new guidance?

                Under the new guidance and the current period of “Policy Uncertainty” (2025–2026), the specific documentation requirements for assistance animals are shifting, though the goal remains to verify the legitimate need for an accommodation.

                Based on the sources, housing providers can require documentation that addresses the following:

                • Authenticity and Personal Knowledge: Verification efforts now focus heavily on affirming the authenticity of the document and ensuring that the healthcare provider has personal knowledge of the applicant and their disability-related need.
                • Provider Letters with Specific Information: While the sources note that there is a “reduced reliance on prior notices” (like FHEO-2020-01), they emphasize that provider letters should still contain specific information to be considered valid.
                • Legal Attestation: Applicants can be required to provide a legal attestation regarding the truthfulness of their request.
                • The “Interactive Process”: Documentation is often requested as part of an “Interactive Process,” where the housing provider and applicant engage in a dialogue to determine the necessity of the accommodation.
                • Guidance on Unreliable Documentation

                  The sources highlight that housing providers should be cautious of certain types of documentation that may not meet the necessary criteria:

                  • Online ESA Mills: Documentation consisting of certificates purchased online without a genuine provider relationship is flagged as a concern.
                  • Purchased “Boilerplate” Letters: Generic, boilerplate letters sold specifically to bypass pet policies are often insufficient to establish a legitimate need.
                  • Because HUD is reporting the withdrawal of some previous guidance, the sources suggest that housing teams must focus on maintaining consistent and defensible processes for evaluating this documentation to manage increased operational risk.

                    What is the impact of the Interactive Process?

                    The Interactive Process serves as a critical framework for evaluating assistance animal requests, particularly during the current period of policy uncertainty. According to the sources, its impact is primarily seen in how it facilitates verification and manages risk for housing providers.

                    The key impacts of the Interactive Process include:

                    • Fraud Identification and Non-Responsiveness: A significant outcome of following this process is the ability to identify fraudulent requests. If an applicant fails to respond during the interactive dialogue or if fraud is discovered, the process allows the housing provider to clearly notify both parties that the request will be treated as a pet rather than an assistance animal.
                    • Requirement for Legal Attestation: As part of this process, applicants are required to provide a legal attestation regarding the truthfulness of their accommodation request, which adds a layer of accountability and helps ensure the request is legitimate.
                    • Defensible Compliance: Utilizing the Interactive Process ensures that determinations are 100% aligned with HUD, ADA, and Fair Housing guidelines. This helps housing teams maintain “defensible compliance” and reduces the risk of legal challenges .
                    • Standardization of Reviews: By following this HUD-defined process, platforms like PetScreening can provide a consistent and documented path for every request, which is essential for managing the increased legal variability reported in 2025–2026.
                    • In essence, the Interactive Process moves the evaluation from a simple document check to an active engagement that ensures only those with legitimate, verified needs receive the accommodation.

                      Can pet rent be charged for assistance animals?

                      Based on the sources, the answer depends on whether the animal is a verified assistance animal or is determined to be a pet through the evaluation process.

                      Under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), which the sources emphasize has remained stable despite new HUD guidance, the following rules apply:

                      • No Pet Rent for Verified Assistance Animals: Because the “Reasonable Accommodation Framework” and “Disability Protections” have not changed, assistance animals are not considered pets. Therefore, housing providers cannot charge pet rent, pet fees, or pet deposits for a verified assistance animal.
                      • Treatment as a Pet if Denied: The sources state that if a request for an assistance animal is found to be fraudulent, or if the applicant fails to respond during the “Interactive Process,” the housing provider can notify the parties that the animal will be treated as a pet. In these specific cases, pet-related fees and rent would be permitted.
                      • Stable Legal Obligations: While there is “Policy Uncertainty” regarding how to evaluate requests and a “reduced reliance on prior notices,” the core legal obligation to provide reasonable accommodations without pet-related charges remains in effect.
                      • In summary, as long as the animal meets the criteria for an assistance animal under the stable FHA framework, it is exempt from pet rent. This remains a top concern for housing teams, which is why the sources recommend maintaining a consistent and defensible process for evaluating every request.

                        How should housing teams evaluate requests for multiple assistance animals?

                        Housing teams should evaluate requests for multiple assistance animals by applying a Reasonableness Test based on HUD guidance to determine the validity of the requests. According to the sources, there are four primary criteria and common concerns for housing teams to consider:

                        • Household Ratio: Teams should evaluate the reasonableness of the total number of animals within a single household, such as a situation where five residents each request an Emotional Support Animal (ESA).
                        • Nexus to Disability: Providers need to understand the “nexus,” or connection, between the multiple animals and the specific disability. This is particularly relevant when an applicant requests two or more ESAs for a single disability, as the team must determine why more than one animal is necessary to meet that single need.
                        • Timing and Sequence of Requests: The evaluation should take into account when the requests are made, especially if there are sequential accommodation requests or if multiple requests are submitted shortly after a resident moves in.
                        • Case-by-Case Evaluations: Despite the complexity of multiple requests, the fundamental requirement to conduct individual, case-by-case evaluations remains unchanged under the Fair Housing Act.
                        • By focusing on these criteria, housing teams can manage the increased legal variability of the current “Policy Uncertainty” period while ensuring they remain in defensible compliance.

                          What is the Reasonableness Test for multiple animal requests?

                          Explain the difference between the 2020 and 2025 standards.

                          How can teams identify fraud during the Interactive Pro

                          6 min
                        • New HUD rule concerning Emotional Support Animals (ESA)

                          The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development no longer requires landlords to waive pet policies for untrained emotional support animals.

                          HUD has determined that requests to waive pet policies for animals trained to perform specific disability-related services are reasonable, but requests to waive pet policies for untrained ESAs are not. HUD no longer expects housing providers to extend accommodations intended for trained assistance animals to untrained ESAs.

                          HUD will only investigate cases involving animals trained to provide disability-related assistance. Untrained emotional support animals will no longer be considered exempt from pet fees in rental property.

                          The Americans with Disabilities Act defines a service animal as “individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of an individual with a disability, including a physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability.” To be a service animal, the tasks performed by the animal “must be directly related” to the disability. Providing emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship do not constitute work or tasks for the purposes of this definition.

                          Going forward, HUD will use the training component of the ADA’s definition for service animals to assess animal-related reasonable accommodation complaints under the Fair Housing Act. Defining an assistance animal as an animal trained to assist with a disability is the best guarantee of evenhanded enforcement of the Fair Housing Act.

                          Absent guidance from federal or state authorities, Texas REALTORS® recommends a measured approach to working with tenants with ESAs. A lease is a legally binding document, so landlords may not immediately charge a tenant a pet fee or pet deposit if the lease already states none is required. Texas REALTORS® will continue to monitor HUD’s guidance but in the meantime property managers and landlords with questions about making changes to leases based on this guidance should speak with legal counsel who can advise them on the best way to proceed.

                          3 min
                        • Should I use a broker?

                           June 7, 2026 at 12:48 AM

                          Reasons that real estate owners can get help from a real estate broker to help sell their real estate property

                          Selling a property is often one of the largest financial transactions a person will make, and the process has a lot of moving parts. While some owners consider selling on their own (FSBO, or “For Sale By Owner”), partnering with a licensed real estate broker provides distinct advantages that directly impact the final sales price, legal safety, and overall stress levels.

                          Here are the primary reasons real estate owners rely on a broker to sell their property:

                          1. Accurate Pricing & Market Analysis

                          Setting the right asking price is a delicate balance. Price it too high, and the listing sits on the market, becoming “stale”; price it too low, and the owner leaves money on the table.

                          • Comparative Market Analysis (CMA): Brokers analyze recent local sales data, pending contracts, and active competing listings to determine a precise market value.
                          • Micro-Market Expertise: They understand hyper-local trends—such as how a specific school district, neighborhood boundary, or local development affects property values—in ways that generic online valuation algorithms cannot replicate.
                          • 2. Comprehensive Marketing & Exposure

                            Putting a “For Sale” sign in the yard and listing on basic public sites only reaches a fraction of potential buyers. Brokers provide an aggressive, multi-channel marketing strategy.

                            • The MLS Advantage: Brokers list properties on the Multiple Listing Service (MLS), which instantly syndicates the property to thousands of agent websites and major consumer real estate portals.
                            • Professional Network & B2B Marketing: A massive portion of real estate sales happens through broker-to-broker networking. Brokers market listings directly to other active agents who already represent qualified buyers.
                            • Staging and Media Production: They coordinate professional photography, virtual 3D tours, drone footage, and high-quality digital/print collateral to ensure the property makes a strong first impression.
                            • 3. Buyer Screening & Showing Management

                              Managing inquiries and property showings can quickly become a full-time job for an owner.

                              • Pre-Qualifying Buyers: Brokers vet incoming leads to ensure potential buyers are financially pre-approved or pre-qualified before they ever step foot inside the property, saving time and protecting security.
                              • Secure Showing Coordination: They utilize secure electronic lockbox systems to track exactly which licensed agents enter the property and when, handling the logistics of scheduling appointments around the owner’s life.
                              • 4. Contract Negotiation & Maximizing Net Proceeds

                                Negotiating a real estate deal involves much more than just the final sales price.

                                • Objective Representation: Because they are not emotionally attached to the property, brokers can advocate objectively, counter-offering effectively without letting emotion derail the deal.
                                • Structuring Complex Terms: A broker negotiates critical contract variables, including earnest money deposits, financing contingencies, appraisal cushions, repair credits, and title/escrow fees to protect the seller’s bottom line.
                                • 5. Risk Mitigation & Legal Compliance

                                  The legal framework surrounding real estate transfers is strict, and mistakes can lead to costly lawsuits after closing.

                                  There are approximately 150 form for transactions, disclosures, amendments, and extensions.

                                  • Standardized Form Sets: Brokers utilize legally vetted, standardized contract forms and addenda (such as state or association-approved residential/commercial contracts) to ensure all terms are binding and enforceable.
                                  • Required Disclosures: They guide sellers through mandatory property condition disclosures, lead-based paint notifications, and environmental disclosures, ensuring compliance with local, state, and federal laws.
                                  • Transaction Management: From contract execution to closing, they coordinate with inspectors, appraisers, surveyors, title companies, and attorneys to ensure all contractual deadlines (like feasibility or option periods) are strictly met.
                                  • The Net Return Reality: While utilizing a broker involves paying a commission, data consistently shows that properties represented by brokers sell for significantly higher average prices than FSBO properties, frequentl

                                    21 min
                                  • ESA and the “Mrs. Murphy exemption”.

                                    Produced at the Poodle Ranch

                                    concerning emotional support animals, are landlords given exceptions under FHA rules, if the building only has 4 apartments

                                    Yes, under the federal Fair Housing Act (FHA), there is a specific exception that can apply to buildings with four or fewer units. This is commonly known as the “Mrs. Murphy Exemption.”

                                    However, the exception only applies if certain criteria are met. Here is the breakdown:

                                    1. The “Mrs. Murphy” Exemption

                                    A landlord is generally exempt from the FHA’s requirements regarding Emotional Support Animals (ESAs) if:

                                    • The building has four or fewer units (e.g., a four-plex, triplex, or duplex).
                                    • The owner lives in one of the units as their primary residence.
                                    • 2. When the Exemption Does NOT Apply

                                      Even if the building only has four units, the landlord must still follow FHA rules (meaning they must allow a documented ESA) if:

                                      • The owner does not live on-site: if the landlord lives elsewhere, the building is treated like any other commercial rental property and must comply with the FHA.
                                      • A Real Estate Agent is used: If the landlord uses a licensed broker or management company to rent the units, the exemption is typically voided.
                                      • Discriminatory Advertising: Landlords cannot run ads saying “no disabled tenants” or “no ESAs,” even if they are otherwise exempt. The exemption applies to the act of choosing a tenant, not the advertising of the property.
                                      • 3. Texas-Specific Considerations

                                        In Texas, state law generally mirrors the federal FHA. While the federal “Mrs. Murphy” rule provides a shield for small, owner-occupied dwellings, it is important to note:

                                        • Reasonable Accommodation: In most other rental situations, an ESA is not considered a “pet” but an “assistance animal.” Landlords cannot charge pet deposits or pet rent for them.
                                        • Documentation: A landlord (who is not exempt) can request a “reliable disability-related need” letter from a healthcare professional but cannot ask for specific medical records or a diagnosis.
                                        • 4 min
                                        • Emotional Support Animals

                                          Must a prospective apartment tenant be treated differently if that prospective tenant has an emotional support animal

                                          Yes, under both federal and Texas fair housing laws, a prospective tenant with an Emotional Support Animal (ESA) must be treated differently than a standard pet owner.

                                          In the eyes of the law, an ESA is not a pet; it is considered an “assistance animal” (a medical tool), similar to a wheelchair or a prescription.

                                          1. Key Legal Protections

                                          Under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and the Texas Fair Housing Act, landlords must provide “reasonable accommodations” for people with disabilities. This means:

                                          • No Pet Fees or Deposits: You cannot charge pet rent, a one-time pet fee, or an additional pet deposit for an ESA.
                                          • “No-Pet” Policies Don’t Apply: Even if your property has a strict “no pets” rule, you must generally allow a documented ESA.
                                          • No Breed or Weight Restrictions: You cannot deny an ESA based on its breed (e.g., Pit Bulls) or size, unless that specific animal poses a documented safety threat.
                                          • 2. What You CAN Ask For

                                            You are not required to take the tenant’s word for it. You have the right to request:

                                            • An ESA Letter: This must be from a licensed healthcare professional (doctor, therapist, or psychiatrist).
                                            • Established Relationship (New for 2026): Recent updates to Texas guidelines emphasize that “ESA certificates” purchased from instant-download websites are often insufficient. You can require that the letter come from a provider with an established therapeutic relationship with the tenant.
                                            • Note on Diagnosis: You cannot ask for the tenant’s specific medical diagnosis or their medical records. You can only ask for confirmation that they have a disability and that the animal provides a disability-related benefit.
                                            • 3. When Can You Deny an ESA?

                                              While the protections are strong, they are not absolute. You may deny the request if:

                                              • Direct Threat: The specific animal has a history of aggression or poses a direct threat to the safety of others.
                                              • Property Damage: The animal causes “substantial” physical damage to the property that cannot be reduced by another accommodation.
                                              • Undue Burden: Accommodating the animal would cause an “undue financial or administrative burden” (though this is a very high bar to prove in court).
                                              • Small Owner-Occupied Buildings: If you live in one unit of a building with four or fewer units (the “Mrs. Murphy” exemption), you may be exempt from certain FHA rules.
                                              • Summary Table: Pet vs. ESA

                                                Feature
                                                Standard Pet
                                                Emotional Support Animal
                                                Status
                                                Luxury/Amenity
                                                Medical Necessity
                                                Pet Deposit/Rent
                                                Allowed
                                                Illegal
                                                Breed Bans
                                                Allowed
                                                Illegal
                                                Required Proof
                                                None
                                                Licensed ESA Letter

                                                4 min
                                              • Real Estate Black Belt

                                                Sixth degree Black Belt in Real Estate?
                                                Last week I attended the funeral of the “Father of American Karate” Allen Steen. It was attended by a group of karate notables including a dozen 10th degree black belts and several grand masters. He got his black belt while attending the University of Texas in Austin in 1963.

                                                He became a 10th degree black belt and he defeated Chuck Norris and Joe Lewis, well know fighters. He owned a chain of 10 karate schools… If you go to ChatGPT ioe Gemini.google and type in “ Texas Blood and Gut”, it will discuss Allen Steen and others in the Texas fight circuit who were concerned with power, not points.

                                                For 4 years, I was program director and an instructor at his school in central Dallas and was fortunate to travel and train with numerous champions in the Texas area. Then I 1977 I moved closer to family in Houston, where I was born…. But I think I grew in Dallas.
                                                After ten years with a world wide investment banking firm, I got smoked out by a bad market.
                                                I went to work with my father’s very successful property Tax Consulting firm, but it was a part time seasonal business.

                                                I continued to help him while I began selling home for a national real estate brokerage for 12 years and then transferred to their commercial real estate brokerage office for 5 years.
                                                I yearned to have my own brokerage firm, so I pasted that exam.
                                                Over time time brokerage 139 multifamily apartment properties.
                                                The funeral of Allen Steen and reminiscing old memories with the karate dignitaries that attended. I ask the question.

                                                Am I a black belt in Real Estate?
                                                As Senior property tax consultant representing thousand of properties at 5 Appraisal Districts and also hundreds of brokerage buy and sell transactions, I still can not scratch through and change a contract, because I am not an attorney.
                                                There are numerous tests to pass to be a Real Estate GrandMaster.
                                                Agent, Broker, Appraiser, Mortgage Loan officer, Building Inspector, Property Tax Consultant, Property Insurance broker, and Attorney.

                                                I suppose I have the experience to be a 6th or 8th degree black belt in Real Estate.
                                                Actually, what matters is performance.

                                                3 min
                                              • Gosh I am good – I negotiated for new lease for owner.

                                                In October 2025, this month, my client closed the purchase of a commercial property worth approximately $1,650,000 in southwest Houston.  Negotiations took approximately 3 weeks, because buyer and seller were sometimes traveling.  Neither buyer nor seller appeared motivated, but they were.  The broker representing the seller was professional and helpful.

                                                There had been other purchase offers from other prospective buyers.

                                                My client made a cash offer which therefore was not contingent upon getting a loan with a reasonable amounts of earnest money and the option fee to buy the right to terminate during feasibility and inspections.

                                                My client buyer immediately had a tenant for the property at a fair lease rate for 5 years.

                                                The lease contract is promulgated and approved by the Texas Real Estate Commission and Association of Realtors. It provides that the tenant pay a monthly base rate plus a rate for property ad valorem taxes and hazard insurance and common area maintenance, referred to a CAM.

                                                CAM, common area maintenance are paid by tenant each month plus the base rent amount. This monthly CAM payment is to pay for the  normal operating expenses paid by the owner.

                                                The problem is that rent payments do not pay for Major Future capital expenditures such as Roof replacement Nor building foundation repairs.  Both may seldom happen but they are expensive large amount of money. A roof may cost $4 per square foot, thus can be between $20,000 to $100,000 depending on the size of the building.  Foundation repairs can cost $250 a foot to dig under a foundation. It may cost $400 per pier footing placed each 4 feet under the concrete slab.  A foundation repair on a small building might cost $10,000 to $20,000 or more.

                                                Houston was built on mud. Thick dark grey gumbo soil. Every building will eventually need foundation work.  The gumbo clay soil imbibes water then dries, thus the foundation moves each dry or wet season.

                                                I devised a method for the tenant to pay for Future Major Capital Expenditures.

                                                The lease requires that the tenant to pay 5 cents per square foot of building each month, into a Sinking Fund (no pun intended).  Thus a 15,600 square foot building would monthly pay  $833 to landlord which is required to go into a separate saving account.  Each year the amount paid into the Sinking Fund is $10,000, thus after 5 years the fund has deposited $50,000.  Roofs and foundations are expensive to maintain.

                                                Normally, owners do not easily find the funds and may try to sell the building.  They would get a higher price if he building is in good condition to sell or lease.  It is like trying to sell a car with faulty transmission.

                                                Phone me to discuss at  2812368189 your building if you are about to negotiate a new lease.

                                                4 min
                                              • New Texas law about squatters

                                                Lester Langdon here.  In the past, several of my clients have had problems with squatters.  Here is a recent article from the Fort Worth Star Telegram, written by Tiffani Jackson

                                                Here’s what Texas’ new squatter laws mean for landlords, tenants and homeowners

                                                It’s a nightmare scenario for homeowners — discovering that someone has taken up residence in your property without permission, and finding out the process to remove them is anything but simple.

                                                Lawmakers say squatting has become a growing problem in Texas, frustrating property owners and leaving law enforcement with limited options.

                                                To address it, Gov. Greg Abbott signed two new laws this summer that make it easier to clear squatters from private property and add tougher penalties for fraud and trespassing. “Texas is facing a squatting crisis, with property owners struggling to evict delinquent tenants or remove people who were never supposed to be on their property in the first place,” Abbott said in a news release. Critics, however, warn the measures could blur the line between squatters and struggling tenants behind on rent. Whether you’re a landlord, homeowner or tenant, here’s what to know about how the new laws work.

                                                Who is considered a squatter under Texas law? A squatter is someone who occupies property without permission, such as an abandoned home or a residence where they were never granted a lease. Unlike guests who overstay their welcome and may be considered tenants, squatters generally have no lease or rental agreement to protect them. Texas law has long recognized “adverse possession,” which allows someone to claim ownership after occupying land for years under strict conditions, but that process is rare. The more pressing issue for most homeowners is how to quickly remove someone who moves in without consent and refuses to leave. How does the new law change the process?

                                                Senate Bill 1333 creates a new legal tool for homeowners: filing a sworn affidavit with the sheriff to request immediate removal of squatters. This bypasses the drawn-out eviction process that usually applies to tenants. The law also ramps up penalties for squatting-related fraud, making it a misdemeanor to present fake deeds and a felony to sell, lease or rent property using fraudulent documents. Property damage caused while trespassing now carries heavier criminal charges, with damage over $1,000 potentially prosecuted as a second-degree felony.

                                                Importantly, the expedited removal process does not apply to family members or current/former tenants, it’s focused on unauthorized occupants only. What protections exist if someone is wrongfully removed? Lawmakers built in safeguards for people who are mistakenly evicted under the new process. I

                                                If an individual can prove they were wrongfully removed, they can sue the property owner for damages. That includes actual losses, exemplary damages, attorney’s fees, court costs and up to three times the fair market rent of the property. These protections aim to balance property owners’ rights with due process for legitimate occupants.

                                                How does the law affect evictions in Texas? Senate Bill 38 targets the court side of eviction proceedings, requiring justice courts to hear cases faster — within 10 to 21 days of filing. It also allows courts to issue summary judgments in clear squatting cases, speeding up removal when the facts are straightforward. The law clarifies how landlords must serve notices to avoid disputes over whether squatters were properly informed. Justice courts are limited to ruling only on possession of the property, not title disputes or broader claims, which keeps cases narrowly focused. The bill also prevents local courts or agencies from altering eviction rules, creating consistency statewide.

                                                When do the new laws take effect? SB 1333 took effect on Sept. 1, 2025. SB 38 will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026. Both were passed during the 89th Texas Legislative Session and signed by Gov. Abbott, who said they will give homeowners “an efficient means of evicting squatters from their property.” While squatting cases remain relatively rare, supporters say the laws provide much-needed clarity and faster remedies for property owners.

                                                When do the new laws take effect? SB 1333 took effect on Sept. 1, 2025. SB 38 will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026. Both were passed during the 89th Texas Legislative Session and signed by Gov. Abbott, who said they will give homeowners “an efficient means of evicting squatters from their property.” While squatting cases remain relatively rare, supporters say the laws provide much-needed clarity and faster remedies for property owners.

                                                6 min

                                              About Podcast – Houstonius

                                              From the publisher's feed

                                              Real Estate Help