Political Science? No problem et al.!

In the fifth episode of “Political Science? No Problem et al.” we talk to Professor Noam Gidron about democratic backsliding in Israel. What ideological motivations lie behind the controversial plans to weaken the Israeli justice system? What attitudes explain public support for these plans and democratic backsliding in general? How can Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party and its plans to restructure the justice system be compared with situations in Poland and Hungary?

We also discussed the role of affective polarization in Israeli society and how the ongoing war might influence the attempted erosion of Israel's democratic institutions in the long term. 

Noam Gidron is an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. His previous research is especially known for its findings on affective polarization and the link between social status and support for populist parties. 

You can find his website here: https://en.politics.huji.ac.il/people/noam-gidron  and follow him on Twitter here: https://x.com/NoamGidron.  Noams work discussed in the episode can be found here: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/zxukm and here: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/900431 . If you'd like to give us feedback, consider rating the podcast wherever you listen to it or send us a message on Twitter (https://twitter.com/V_Burgi & https://twitter.com/Julius_Ktxt)

In the fourth episode of “Political Science? No Problem et al.” we talk to Professor Sabrina Mayer about the voting behavior of immigrant origin voters in Germany. How can we understand the voting behavior of this heterogeneous voter group and what do we know about their party preferences? Why is there a stronger affinity for the AfD among Russian Germans and to what extent has the party affiliation of Turkish-German voters changed in recent years? Moreover, we discussed whether parties are increasingly trying to appeal to migrant voters, what kind of information environment these voters find themselves in and what the methodological difficulties are in studying their political preferences.  

Sabrina is a full professor of Political Sociology at the University of Bamberg as well as associated member at the DeZIM Institute in Berlin.  Her research focuses on group identities, political attitudes and comparative voting behavior and is best known for findings on the voting behavior of migrant voters. 

You can find her website here: https://sabrinajmayer.de/ and follow her on Twitter here: https://twitter.com/sabrinajmayer?lang=de. Sabrina´s work discussed in the episode can be found here:https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=r8VOcJYAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao

If you'd like to give us feedback, consider rating the podcast wherever you listen to it or send us a message on Twitter (https://twitter.com/V_Burgi & https://twitter.com/Julius_Ktxt)

In the third episode of "Political Science? No Problem et al.", we talk to Dr. Magdalena Breyer about voters' reactions to different representation trajectories of women in politics. Does an increase in the proportion of female politicians trigger a conservative backlash? Can stagnating women's representation mobilize female voters for progressive parties? And what does this tell us about changing gender-related status hierarchies in western societies as a whole? More broadly, we discussed general gender disparities in voting behavior, how older and younger women differ in political preferences and how different parties try to appeal to female voters. 

Magda is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Basel and studies the implications of shifting class and status structures for voting behavior and party competition. You can find her website here: https://www.magdalenabreyer.net/ and follow her on Twitter here:https://twitter.com/magda_breyer. Magda's paper discussed in the episode can be accessed here:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00104140231223745

If you'd like to give us feedback, consider rating the podcast wherever you listen to it or send us a message on Twitter (https://twitter.com/V_Burgi & https://twitter.com/Julius_Ktxt)

In the second episode of "Political Science? No Problem et al.!" we talk to Nils Steiner about the new German party "BSW", based on his research on the left-authoritarian supply gap.  What is special about this party? What peculiar positions does it take on cultural and economic issues? What might its electorate look like? And does it pose a threat to the rise of the radical right in Germany?

Nils is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Mainz and studies voting behaviour, representation and political attitudes. You can follow him here on Twitter: https://twitter.com/NilsSteiner. If you are interested in Nils' research on left-wing authoritarian voting behavior and parties, here are two papers mentioned in the episode: 

https://shorturl.at/BKR27

https://shorturl.at/qxEHO

https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12348

The paper by Sarah Wagner, Constantin Wurthmann and Jan Philipp Thomeczek on the voter potential of the BSW can be found here: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11615-023-00481-3

The mentioned analysis by Marc Debus, Christian Stecker and Jochen Müller on BSW party positions: https://twitter.com/DebusMarc/status/1744695079011254585

If you'd like to give us feedback, consider rating the podcast wherever you listen to it or send us a message on Twitter (https://twitter.com/V_Burgi & https://twitter.com/Julius_Ktxt)

In the first episode of "Political Science? - No Problem et al." we talk to Kai Arzheimer about the ongoing popularity of the far-right party AfD in Germany. Among other things, we discussed what explains support for the AfD, what the party's electorate looks like, why the party is proving more successful in eastern Germany and to what extent the ongoing mass protests could have an impact on the party's fortunes.

Kai Arzheimer is a professor of political science at the University of Mainz and investigates the radical right for decades. He is a leading researcher in his field.

Enjoy the podcast!

If you want to give us feedback, please rate the podcast wherever you are listening to this or send us a message on Twitter or Bluesky (https://twitter.com/V_Burgi or https://twitter.com/Julius_Ktxt).

Die SPD hat sich nicht von den Arbeitern entfernt. Sie ist ihnen im Gegenteil noch viel zu nahe.

Für den Heidelberger Blog Absatz-Magazin habe ich einen Essay über die Lage der Sozialdemokratie im 21. Jahrhundert geschrieben. Für diese Podcast-Folge habe ich den Text einsprechen lassen.

Link zum Essay: https://www.absatz-magazin.de/post/der-riese-in-der-krise

Im Frühjahr 2020 wurde die These der Retraditionalisierung der Geschlechter häufig diskutiert. Die Corona-Pandemie werde zu einem Rückfall in der erreichten Gleichstellung der Geschlechter führen - so die Befürchtung. Hält die These der empirischen Überprüfung stand? Dieser Frage gehe ich auf Basis einiger Studien zum Thema nach. Außerdem rede ich über das Einhalten von Social-Distancing-Regeln und empfehle "Unverfügbarkeit" von Hartmut Rosa.

Ausschnitte aus Medien:

Jutta Allmendinger bei Anne Will: https://www.ardmediathek.de/daserste/video/anne-will/-frauen-werden-entsetzliche-retraditionalisierung-erfahren--/das-erste/Y3JpZDovL25kci5kZS9lYWJlZTI4ZC1jMGNiLTQ3MDYtOWZiNC0wN2U5MTk3YTExYTU/

Hartmut Rosa im Deutschlandfunk: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/folgen-der-coronakrise-was-in-unserer-gesellschaft-wirklich.886.de.html?dram:article_id=477022

Quellen:

Hartmut Rosa (2019): Unverfügbarkeit. Resonanz Verlag.

Helen Lewis (2020): Das weibliche Desaster, Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft.

Karsten Hank & Anja Steinbach (2020): The virus changed everything, didn’t it? Couples’ division of housework and childcare before and during the Corona crisis, Journal of Family Research, Early View.

Lena Hipp & Mareike Bünning (2020): Parenthood as a driver of increased gender inequality during COVID-19? Exploratory evidence from Germany, European Societies

Lynn Williams, Susan Rasmussen, Adam Kleczkowski, Savi Maharaj & Nicole Cairns (2015): Protection motivation theory and social distancing behaviour in response to a simulated infectious disease epidemic, Psychology, Health & Medicine.

Studie WSI/Hans-Böckler-Stiftung: https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_wsi_pb_40_2020.pdf 

Studie Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung: https://www.bib.bund.de/Publikation/2020/pdf/Eltern-waehrend-der-Corona-Krise.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=7 

Studie mit Daten des SOEP: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.794183.de/diw_sp1096.pdf

Alle Jahre wieder veröffentlichen Generationenforscher die "Shell-Jugendstudie". Die macht dann medial einmal groß die Runde: "So tickt die neue Generation!", heißt es. Wir besprechen, was daran aus soziologischer Sicht faul ist.

Außerdem in der Folge: Wie der Klimawandel an der Entstehung einer globalen Öffentlichkeit beteiligt sein könnte - und wie weit diese fortgeschritten ist.

Zurück aus der Winterpause! Ich schaue mir an, wer denn jetzt eigentlich AfD wählt und wie der Journalismus über die Flüchtlingskrise berichtet hat.

Quellen:

Franz, Christian; Fratzscher, Marcel; Kritikos, Alexander S. (2018): "AfD in dünn besiedelten Räumen mit Überalterungsproblemen stärker. In: DIW Wochenbericht, o. Jg. (8), S. 135-145.

Haller, Michael (2017): Die "Flüchtlingskrise" in den Medien. Tagesaktueller Journalismus zwischen Meinung und Information. In: OBS-Arbeitsheft 93, S. 1–184.

Maurer, Marcus; Jost, Pablo; Haßler, Jörg; Kruschinski, Simon (2019): Auf den Spuren der Lügenpresse. Zur Richtigkeit und Ausgewogenheit der Medienberichterstattung in der "Flüchtlingskrise". In: Publizistik 64 (1), S. 15–35.

Schröder, Martin (2018): AfD-Unterstützer sind nicht abgehängt, sondern ausländerfeindlich. In: SOEPpapers 975, S. 1-20.

Bild zur Episode: 

Helvetica, "Zeitung2", 

Some rights reserved. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/de/deed.de)

Quelle: www.piqs.de

Seit Jahren heißt es "Die Leute vertrauen den Medien nicht mehr". Aber ist das eigentlich wirklich so? Und was ist so schlimm daran, Wörter wie "Lügenpresse" zu benutzen, wenn wir selbst doch gar nicht daran glauben? Diese Fragen kläre ich in der ersten Ausgabe von "Unter Eins - der Sowi-Pod". Dafür habe ich mich mit der Mainzer Langzeitstudie Medienvertrauen und den Erkenntnissen von Neuro-Forscherin Elisabeth Wehling beschäftigt.