Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Politološki podkast #9: Just and Unjust Riots - Gost: Jonathan Havercroft
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Politološki podkast #9: Just and Unjust Riots - Gost: Jonathan Havercroft
Epizoda #9: Pravedni i nepravedni neredi
Gost: Jonathan Havercroft
U 9. epizodi Politološkog podkasta, naš voditelj Enes Kulenović
razgovarao je s Jonathanom Havercroftom, izvanrednim profesorom na
Odsjeku za političku znanost i međunarodne studije Sveučilišta u
Southamptonu, o njegovoj predstojećoj knjizi pod naslovom Pravedni i
nepravedni neredi: normativna analiza nasilnih prosvjeda. Može li
normativna politička teorija povući granicu između opravdanih i
neopravdanih nasilnih prosvjeda? Prema kojim kriterijima? Autor knjige
je od tinejdžera nazočnog na koncertu Metallice i Guns'n'Rosesa u
Montrealu 1992, koji je završio nasiljem, postao stručnjak koji
savjetuje britansku vladu o nasilnim prosvjedima. Vođen politološkom
skepsom prema državnim mehanizmima kontrole gomila, odlučio se upustiti u
paradoksalan teren, nezahvalan za pravo te sklizak za političku
teoriju: opravdanje i osudu političkog nasilja svjetina u demokratskim
porecima. Što je s uništavanjem imovine, pljačkanjem, pa i međuljudskim
fizičkim nasiljem? Može li liberalno-demokratska politička teorija
opravdati nasilno političko djelovanje van zakona, državnog monopola
prinude, institucionalnog aparata, pa i građanske javnosti u
habermasovskom smislu? Kako, u jeku kulturnih ratova i političkih nemira
u zapadnim demokracijama, Havercroft ocjenjuje rušenja spomenika,
juriše na kongres i protupolicijske proteste, te kako nasilne prosvjede
povezuje sa zdravljem demokracije, doznajte slušajući devetu epizodu
Politološkog podkasta!
Episode #9: Just and Unjust Riots
Guest: Jonathan Havercroft
In the 9th episode of the Political Science Podcast, our host Enes
Kulenović talked with Jonathan Havercroft, associate professor at the
Department of Politics and International Studies, University of
Southampton, about his forthcoming book Just and Unjust Riots: A
Normative Analysis of Militant Protest. Can normative political theory
draw a fine line between justified and unjustified violent protests?
According to what criteria? The author of the book, once a teenager
attending a Metallica and Guns'n'Roses concert in Montreal in 1992, that
ended in riots, became an expert advising the British government on
violent protests. Driven by political skepticism towards the
government’s potentially authoritarian policing of the crowds,
Havercroft decided to embark on a quite paradoxical terrain, ungrateful
for law and still slippery for political theory: the justification and
condemnation of political violence by mobs in democratic orders. What
about vandalism, looting, and even interpersonal physical violence? Can
the liberal-democratic political theory justify such political actions
outside the law, the state monopoly of coercion, the institutional
apparatus, and even the public in the Habermasian sense? How does
Havercroft assess the demolition of monuments, storming the congress,
and anti-police protests amid cultural wars and political unrest in
Western democracies, and how he does he associate riots with the health
of democracy, find out by tuning in to the ninth episode of the
Political Science Podcast!
View all episodes
By Hrvatsko politološko društvoEpizoda #9: Pravedni i nepravedni neredi
Gost: Jonathan Havercroft
U 9. epizodi Politološkog podkasta, naš voditelj Enes Kulenović
razgovarao je s Jonathanom Havercroftom, izvanrednim profesorom na
Odsjeku za političku znanost i međunarodne studije Sveučilišta u
Southamptonu, o njegovoj predstojećoj knjizi pod naslovom Pravedni i
nepravedni neredi: normativna analiza nasilnih prosvjeda. Može li
normativna politička teorija povući granicu između opravdanih i
neopravdanih nasilnih prosvjeda? Prema kojim kriterijima? Autor knjige
je od tinejdžera nazočnog na koncertu Metallice i Guns'n'Rosesa u
Montrealu 1992, koji je završio nasiljem, postao stručnjak koji
savjetuje britansku vladu o nasilnim prosvjedima. Vođen politološkom
skepsom prema državnim mehanizmima kontrole gomila, odlučio se upustiti u
paradoksalan teren, nezahvalan za pravo te sklizak za političku
teoriju: opravdanje i osudu političkog nasilja svjetina u demokratskim
porecima. Što je s uništavanjem imovine, pljačkanjem, pa i međuljudskim
fizičkim nasiljem? Može li liberalno-demokratska politička teorija
opravdati nasilno političko djelovanje van zakona, državnog monopola
prinude, institucionalnog aparata, pa i građanske javnosti u
habermasovskom smislu? Kako, u jeku kulturnih ratova i političkih nemira
u zapadnim demokracijama, Havercroft ocjenjuje rušenja spomenika,
juriše na kongres i protupolicijske proteste, te kako nasilne prosvjede
povezuje sa zdravljem demokracije, doznajte slušajući devetu epizodu
Politološkog podkasta!
Episode #9: Just and Unjust Riots
Guest: Jonathan Havercroft
In the 9th episode of the Political Science Podcast, our host Enes
Kulenović talked with Jonathan Havercroft, associate professor at the
Department of Politics and International Studies, University of
Southampton, about his forthcoming book Just and Unjust Riots: A
Normative Analysis of Militant Protest. Can normative political theory
draw a fine line between justified and unjustified violent protests?
According to what criteria? The author of the book, once a teenager
attending a Metallica and Guns'n'Roses concert in Montreal in 1992, that
ended in riots, became an expert advising the British government on
violent protests. Driven by political skepticism towards the
government’s potentially authoritarian policing of the crowds,
Havercroft decided to embark on a quite paradoxical terrain, ungrateful
for law and still slippery for political theory: the justification and
condemnation of political violence by mobs in democratic orders. What
about vandalism, looting, and even interpersonal physical violence? Can
the liberal-democratic political theory justify such political actions
outside the law, the state monopoly of coercion, the institutional
apparatus, and even the public in the Habermasian sense? How does
Havercroft assess the demolition of monuments, storming the congress,
and anti-police protests amid cultural wars and political unrest in
Western democracies, and how he does he associate riots with the health
of democracy, find out by tuning in to the ninth episode of the
Political Science Podcast!